Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1246614 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig

Started byLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
First post2015-10-14 14:20 +0200
Last post2015-10-16 08:50 +0200
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-10-14 14:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-10-15 15:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-10-15 17:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2015-10-15 17:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-10-16 08:50 +0200

#1246614 — [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig

FromLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Date2015-10-14 14:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig
Message-ID<qjtcd-6Eh-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices.

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
---
 arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig
index 31eb951..6e806f5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ CONFIG_LBDAF=y
 # CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE is not set
 # CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ is not set
 CONFIG_ARCH_AT91=y
-CONFIG_SOC_SAM_V7=y
+CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D2=y
 CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D3=y
 CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D4=y
 CONFIG_AEABI=y
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY=y
 CONFIG_POWER_RESET=y
 # CONFIG_HWMON is not set
 CONFIG_SSB=m
+CONFIG_MFD_ATMEL_FLEXCOM=y
 CONFIG_REGULATOR=y
 CONFIG_REGULATOR_FIXED_VOLTAGE=y
 CONFIG_REGULATOR_ACT8865=y
@@ -171,6 +172,9 @@ CONFIG_USB_ATMEL_USBA=y
 CONFIG_USB_G_SERIAL=y
 CONFIG_MMC=y
 # CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is not set
+CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=y
+CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM=y
+CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_AT91=y
 CONFIG_MMC_ATMELMCI=y
 CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y
 CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1247806

FromAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Date2015-10-15 15:40 +0200
Message-ID<qjQVc-7Re-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1246614
Hi,

On 14/10/2015 at 14:11:24 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
> Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
It is probably worth updating the multi_v7_defconfig too (in a separate
patch).


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1247904

FromLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Date2015-10-15 17:40 +0200
Message-ID<qjSNk-2aP-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1247806
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 14/10/2015 at 14:11:24 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
> > Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> It is probably worth updating the multi_v7_defconfig too (in a separate
> patch).
> 

Maybe I have to send a whole defconfig update . I mean when you do
savedefconfig, you have more changes. I won't send each one separately. I
have kept changes which were in relation with the stuff I had.

Or I can send a defconfig update from the savedefconfig and then add
sama5d2, flexcom and sdhci.

Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1247917

FromNicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Date2015-10-15 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<qjSX0-2mu-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1247904
Le 15/10/2015 17:31, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14/10/2015 at 14:11:24 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>>> Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>> It is probably worth updating the multi_v7_defconfig too (in a separate
>> patch).
>>
> 
> Maybe I have to send a whole defconfig update . I mean when you do
> savedefconfig, you have more changes. I won't send each one separately. I
> have kept changes which were in relation with the stuff I had.
> 
> Or I can send a defconfig update from the savedefconfig and then add
> sama5d2, flexcom and sdhci.

Actually you can do this for our own AT91 defconfigs.

For the multi_v7_defconfig I would recommend to simply make a patch with
our updates and let the arm-soc maintainer merge it with their current
one: I mean, they will manage the conflicts on this file anyway and the
changes to this file will not be part of one or our pull-requests but a
patch that they will handle separately: so no need to add more update
than the strictly needed ones on our end.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1248379

FromLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Date2015-10-16 08:50 +0200
Message-ID<qk6ZY-6Ah-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1247917
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 05:42:53PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 15/10/2015 17:31, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 14/10/2015 at 14:11:24 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
> >>> Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >> It is probably worth updating the multi_v7_defconfig too (in a separate
> >> patch).
> >>
> > 
> > Maybe I have to send a whole defconfig update . I mean when you do
> > savedefconfig, you have more changes. I won't send each one separately. I
> > have kept changes which were in relation with the stuff I had.
> > 
> > Or I can send a defconfig update from the savedefconfig and then add
> > sama5d2, flexcom and sdhci.
> 
> Actually you can do this for our own AT91 defconfigs.
> 
> For the multi_v7_defconfig I would recommend to simply make a patch with
> our updates and let the arm-soc maintainer merge it with their current
> one: I mean, they will manage the conflicts on this file anyway and the
> changes to this file will not be part of one or our pull-requests but a
> patch that they will handle separately: so no need to add more update
> than the strictly needed ones on our end.
> 

In fact, I realize that I have read too quickly Alexandre's answer. I
have understood that I should put CONFIG_SOC_SAM_V7=y in a separate
patch.

So yes I would do a whole update for our defconfigs and only the
addition needed for the multi_v7 one

Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web