Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1248094 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-15 21:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-16 01:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> - 2015-10-15 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> - 2015-10-16 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2015-10-16 01:50 +0200
| From | Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-15 21:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI |
| Message-ID | <qjWee-7ns-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Hanjun, Thanks for your hard work on ARM64 PCI host bridge/root complex so far! On 05/26/2015 08:49 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > This patch set is introducing ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI, > which based on Jiang Liu's patch set "Consolidate ACPI PCI root common > code into ACPI core": > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/98 The latest version (v7) of the ACPI PCI root common code consolidation series was posted by Gerry (Jiang Liu) yesterday: https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1444804182-6596-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com This got me wondering what the status is of the ARM64 specific hostbridge patch series that has a dependency upon the former. Are you planning to wait for that series to be accepted or post a newer rebased version for additional review, or something else? Thanks very much in advance! :) Jon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-16 01:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qk0rv-5j0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1248094 |
Sorry for top posting. Can you summarize the OperationRegion issue? I am aware of a few early firmwares that effectively had the producer/consumer type for bridge resources the wrong way around but not of the specific issue. If ASWG confidential I can take it over there. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On Oct 15, 2015, at 19:43, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On 10/16/2015 03:15 AM, Jon Masters wrote: >> Hi Hanjun, >> >> Thanks for your hard work on ARM64 PCI host bridge/root complex so far! >> >>> On 05/26/2015 08:49 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> This patch set is introducing ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI, >>> which based on Jiang Liu's patch set "Consolidate ACPI PCI root common >>> code into ACPI core": >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/98 >> >> The latest version (v7) of the ACPI PCI root common code consolidation >> series was posted by Gerry (Jiang Liu) yesterday: >> >> https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1444804182-6596-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com >> >> This got me wondering what the status is of the ARM64 specific >> hostbridge patch series that has a dependency upon the former. Are you >> planning to wait for that series to be accepted or post a newer rebased >> version for additional review, or something else? > > Tomasz and Lorenzo are discussing about the PCI config based > OperationRegions, which still have no conclusion yet, Lorenzo > started a discussion on ASWG and hope can get some feedback. > > Other than that, Tomasz volunteered to cleanup this patch set, I > think we need to rebase on Jiang's v7 patchset which was accepted > By Rafael, of course I will work with Tomasz to prepare those > patches. > > Thanks > Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-16 01:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qk0rw-5j0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1248094 |
On 10/16/2015 03:15 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Hanjun, > > Thanks for your hard work on ARM64 PCI host bridge/root complex so far! > > On 05/26/2015 08:49 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> This patch set is introducing ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI, >> which based on Jiang Liu's patch set "Consolidate ACPI PCI root common >> code into ACPI core": >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/98 > > The latest version (v7) of the ACPI PCI root common code consolidation > series was posted by Gerry (Jiang Liu) yesterday: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1444804182-6596-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com > > This got me wondering what the status is of the ARM64 specific > hostbridge patch series that has a dependency upon the former. Are you > planning to wait for that series to be accepted or post a newer rebased > version for additional review, or something else? Tomasz and Lorenzo are discussing about the PCI config based OperationRegions, which still have no conclusion yet, Lorenzo started a discussion on ASWG and hope can get some feedback. Other than that, Tomasz volunteered to cleanup this patch set, I think we need to rebase on Jiang's v7 patchset which was accepted By Rafael, of course I will work with Tomasz to prepare those patches. Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web