Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1247611 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-15 11:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-16 01:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Runtime PM causes oops on next-20151015 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 11:30 +0200
Re: Runtime PM causes oops on next-20151015 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2015-10-15 12:10 +0200
Re: Runtime PM causes oops on next-20151015 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 15:30 +0200
Re: Runtime PM causes oops on next-20151015 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-15 23:00 +0200
RE: Runtime PM causes oops on next-20151015 David Kwon (권원홍) <wonhong.kwon@lge.com> - 2015-10-16 01:40 +0200
| From | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-15 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Runtime PM causes oops on next-20151015 |
| Message-ID | <qjN1f-2cP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Rafael, Wonhong, Todays linux-next breaks rather spectacularly for drivers using runtime PM. The culprit seems to be this commit: commit 7d24068e144adc03b805806645d732cf79488717 Author: Wonhong Kwon <wonhongkwon@gmail.com> Date: Tue Oct 6 10:10:20 2015 +0900 PM / hibernate: Move pm_init/pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync pm_init is being invoked by core_initcall and hibernate_image_size_init calculates preferred image size (image_size) based on total pages (totalram_pages). This totalram_pages can be modified during various initcall-s phase and this can cause miscalculated image_size. For example, when CMA is being used, init_cma_reserved_pageblock tries to change the totalram_pages and this job is done during core_initcall. In order words, the totalram_pages doesn't take CMA reserved pages into account when image_size is calculated and it can be too small. Move pm_init and pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync so that it happens after all other initcall-s change the totalram_pages. Reported-by: Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Wonhong Kwon <wonhong.kwon@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> I can't reply to it directly because I don't have it in any of my mail boxes (it seems to have been sent only to the linux-pm mailing list, even Google finds only a single match). Here's an extract of the oops: [ 1.395928] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000100 [ 1.404013] pgd = ffffffc000e0e000 [ 1.407417] [00000100] *pgd=000000013c007003, *pud=000000013c007003, *pmd=000000013c008003, *pte=0060000050041707 [ 1.417746] Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 1.423316] Modules linked in: [ 1.426400] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-next-20151015+ #1338 [ 1.434138] Hardware name: NVIDIA Tegra210 P2371 (P2180/P2597) reference board (DT) [ 1.441789] task: ffffffc0bc0a8000 ti: ffffffc0bc084000 task.ti: ffffffc0bc084000 [ 1.449280] PC is at __queue_work+0x2c/0x240 [ 1.453551] LR is at queue_work_on+0x60/0x78 ... [ 1.836517] Call trace: [ 1.838968] [<ffffffc0000b4134>] __queue_work+0x2c/0x240 [ 1.844280] [<ffffffc0000b43a4>] queue_work_on+0x5c/0x78 [ 1.849599] [<ffffffc00052e508>] rpm_idle+0xc0/0x140 [ 1.854565] [<ffffffc00052e5dc>] __pm_runtime_idle+0x54/0x98 [ 1.860229] [<ffffffc00052414c>] driver_probe_device+0x164/0x2f8 [ 1.866236] [<ffffffc000524378>] __driver_attach+0x98/0xa0 [ 1.871724] [<ffffffc00052231c>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0xa0 [ 1.877294] [<ffffffc000523ab4>] driver_attach+0x1c/0x28 [ 1.882608] [<ffffffc0005236e4>] bus_add_driver+0x1cc/0x238 [ 1.888180] [<ffffffc000524b1c>] driver_register+0x5c/0xf8 [ 1.893675] [<ffffffc000431800>] mipi_dsi_driver_register_full+0x50/0x60 [ 1.900374] [<ffffffc000ba1570>] panel_simple_init+0x2c/0x44 [ 1.906035] [<ffffffc000082934>] do_one_initcall+0x8c/0x1a0 [ 1.911612] [<ffffffc000b80aa8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x150/0x1f8 [ 1.917711] [<ffffffc0007f78fc>] kernel_init+0xc/0xe0 Instrumenting the code shows that pm_wq (passed to queue_work in the rpm_idle() function) is NULL at this point. This matches up with the change done in the above-mentioned commit, since now pm_wq only gets initialized at late_initcall time, whereas all built-in drivers will already be probed at device_initcall time. So I suspect that this is going to cause crashes on a whole lot of systems (essentially every system that tries to use runtime PM from a built-in driver). Given the commit message I suspect that the right fix would be to split pm_init() into two functions, one that initializes the hibernation image and another with the PM core initialization. The pm_hibernate_init() is probably going to work fine as late_initcall (I assume this was tested) but the rest should probably stay at core_initcall. I can provide a patch for the latter if everyone agrees that it's the right thing, but in the meantime, can you please drop the above patch from your tree to unbreak linux-next for all affected users? Thanks, Thierry
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-15 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjNDZ-3cO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1247611 |
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 11:22 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Wonhong,
>
> Todays linux-next breaks rather spectacularly for drivers using runtime
> PM. The culprit seems to be this commit:
>
> commit 7d24068e144adc03b805806645d732cf79488717
> Author: Wonhong Kwon <wonhongkwon@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue Oct 6 10:10:20 2015 +0900
>
> PM / hibernate: Move pm_init/pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync
>
> pm_init is being invoked by core_initcall and hibernate_image_size_init
> calculates preferred image size (image_size) based on total pages
> (totalram_pages). This totalram_pages can be modified during various
> initcall-s phase and this can cause miscalculated image_size.
>
> For example, when CMA is being used, init_cma_reserved_pageblock tries
> to change the totalram_pages and this job is done during core_initcall.
> In order words, the totalram_pages doesn't take CMA reserved pages into
> account when image_size is calculated and it can be too small.
>
> Move pm_init and pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync so that it happens
> after all other initcall-s change the totalram_pages.
>
> Reported-by: Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wonhong Kwon <wonhong.kwon@lge.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
I'm seeing one too on powerpc:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000030
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000002e4094
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
Modules linked in:
CPU: 5 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-next-20151015-50217-ge2be40d-dirty #37
task: c0000001fefc0000 ti: c0000001fb000000 task.ti: c0000001fb000000
NIP: c0000000002e4094 LR: c000000000c79dd4 CTR: c000000000c79d90
REGS: c0000001fb003900 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (4.3.0-rc5-next-20151015-50217-ge2be40d-dirty)
MSR: 8000000100009032 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 28000882 XER: 20000000
CFAR: c0000000000d117c DAR: 0000000000000030 DSISR: 40000000 SOFTE: 1
GPR00: c00000000000b074 c0000001fb003b80 c000000000e93800 0000000000000000
GPR04: c000000000d15c80 0000000000000000 00000001ff150000 0000000000000026
GPR08: c000000000d0f748 c000000000f41a10 c000000000d0f8e8 c000000000abc59d
GPR12: c000000000b42400 c00000000fdc1680 c00000000000b960 0000000000000000
GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR24: 0000000000000000 c000000000de0360 c000000000c45d28 0000000000000000
GPR28: c000000000deca80 c000000000d103c0 c0000001fbc905c0 c000000000d103c0
NIP [c0000000002e4094] .sysfs_create_file_ns+0x4/0x50
LR [c000000000c79dd4] .__machine_initcall_pseries_apo_pm_init+0x44/0x60
Call Trace:
[c0000001fb003b80] [c0000000004852cc] .kasprintf+0x2c/0x40 (unreliable)
[c0000001fb003bf0] [c00000000000b074] .do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x250
[c0000001fb003ce0] [c000000000c64560] .kernel_init_freeable+0x268/0x348
[c0000001fb003db0] [c00000000000b97c] .kernel_init+0x1c/0x140
[c0000001fb003e30] [c0000000000095ac] .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0xac
Instruction dump:
419e001c 3ce2ffa8 38e7be60 4bfffea4 3ce2ffa8 38e7bea8 4bfffe9c 3ce2ffa8
38e7bea8 4bfffe8c 60000000 2c230000 <e8630030> 41820028 2fa30000 419e0020
---[ end trace d2a742ce359651dd ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b
Which starts at:
static int __init apo_pm_init(void)
{
return (sysfs_create_file(power_kobj, &auto_poweron_attr.attr));
}
machine_device_initcall(pseries, apo_pm_init);
And seems to be caused by power_kobj being NULL:
0:mon> d $power_kobj
c000000000f41a10 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 |................|
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-15 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjQLx-7Gi-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1247633 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:04:54PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 11:22 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Hi Rafael, Wonhong,
> >
> > Todays linux-next breaks rather spectacularly for drivers using runtime
> > PM. The culprit seems to be this commit:
> >
> > commit 7d24068e144adc03b805806645d732cf79488717
> > Author: Wonhong Kwon <wonhongkwon@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue Oct 6 10:10:20 2015 +0900
> >
> > PM / hibernate: Move pm_init/pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync
> >
> > pm_init is being invoked by core_initcall and hibernate_image_size_init
> > calculates preferred image size (image_size) based on total pages
> > (totalram_pages). This totalram_pages can be modified during various
> > initcall-s phase and this can cause miscalculated image_size.
> >
> > For example, when CMA is being used, init_cma_reserved_pageblock tries
> > to change the totalram_pages and this job is done during core_initcall.
> > In order words, the totalram_pages doesn't take CMA reserved pages into
> > account when image_size is calculated and it can be too small.
> >
> > Move pm_init and pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync so that it happens
> > after all other initcall-s change the totalram_pages.
> >
> > Reported-by: Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wonhong Kwon <wonhong.kwon@lge.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
>
> I'm seeing one too on powerpc:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000030
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000002e4094
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 5 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-next-20151015-50217-ge2be40d-dirty #37
> task: c0000001fefc0000 ti: c0000001fb000000 task.ti: c0000001fb000000
> NIP: c0000000002e4094 LR: c000000000c79dd4 CTR: c000000000c79d90
> REGS: c0000001fb003900 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (4.3.0-rc5-next-20151015-50217-ge2be40d-dirty)
> MSR: 8000000100009032 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 28000882 XER: 20000000
> CFAR: c0000000000d117c DAR: 0000000000000030 DSISR: 40000000 SOFTE: 1
> GPR00: c00000000000b074 c0000001fb003b80 c000000000e93800 0000000000000000
> GPR04: c000000000d15c80 0000000000000000 00000001ff150000 0000000000000026
> GPR08: c000000000d0f748 c000000000f41a10 c000000000d0f8e8 c000000000abc59d
> GPR12: c000000000b42400 c00000000fdc1680 c00000000000b960 0000000000000000
> GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR24: 0000000000000000 c000000000de0360 c000000000c45d28 0000000000000000
> GPR28: c000000000deca80 c000000000d103c0 c0000001fbc905c0 c000000000d103c0
> NIP [c0000000002e4094] .sysfs_create_file_ns+0x4/0x50
> LR [c000000000c79dd4] .__machine_initcall_pseries_apo_pm_init+0x44/0x60
> Call Trace:
> [c0000001fb003b80] [c0000000004852cc] .kasprintf+0x2c/0x40 (unreliable)
> [c0000001fb003bf0] [c00000000000b074] .do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x250
> [c0000001fb003ce0] [c000000000c64560] .kernel_init_freeable+0x268/0x348
> [c0000001fb003db0] [c00000000000b97c] .kernel_init+0x1c/0x140
> [c0000001fb003e30] [c0000000000095ac] .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0xac
> Instruction dump:
> 419e001c 3ce2ffa8 38e7be60 4bfffea4 3ce2ffa8 38e7bea8 4bfffe9c 3ce2ffa8
> 38e7bea8 4bfffe8c 60000000 2c230000 <e8630030> 41820028 2fa30000 419e0020
> ---[ end trace d2a742ce359651dd ]---
>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b
>
>
> Which starts at:
>
> static int __init apo_pm_init(void)
> {
> return (sysfs_create_file(power_kobj, &auto_poweron_attr.attr));
> }
> machine_device_initcall(pseries, apo_pm_init);
>
> And seems to be caused by power_kobj being NULL:
>
> 0:mon> d $power_kobj
> c000000000f41a10 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 |................|
Yes, power_kobj is one of the other objects created by pm_init() and
which, evidently, needs to be available much earlier than late_initcall.
The patch below works for me, though I don't use hibernate on this
machine, so that part is untested.
Thierry
--- >8 ---
diff --git a/kernel/power/main.c b/kernel/power/main.c
index b2dd4d999900..2f66453e3a9b 100644
--- a/kernel/power/main.c
+++ b/kernel/power/main.c
@@ -648,8 +648,6 @@ static int __init pm_init(void)
int error = pm_start_workqueue();
if (error)
return error;
- hibernate_image_size_init();
- hibernate_reserved_size_init();
power_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("power", NULL);
if (!power_kobj)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -661,3 +659,13 @@ static int __init pm_init(void)
}
core_initcall(pm_init);
+
+static int __init hibernate_init(void)
+{
+ hibernate_image_size_init();
+ hibernate_reserved_size_init();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+late_initcall_sync(hibernate_init);
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-15 23:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjXN0-1dR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1247799 |
On Thursday, October 15, 2015 03:26:55 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:04:54PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 11:22 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael, Wonhong,
> > >=20
> > > Todays linux-next breaks rather spectacularly for drivers using runtime
> > > PM. The culprit seems to be this commit:
> > >=20
> > > commit 7d24068e144adc03b805806645d732cf79488717
> > > Author: Wonhong Kwon <wonhongkwon@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Tue Oct 6 10:10:20 2015 +0900
> > >=20
> > > PM / hibernate: Move pm_init/pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync
> > >=20
> > > pm_init is being invoked by core_initcall and hibernate_image_size=
> _init
> > > calculates preferred image size (image_size) based on total pages
> > > (totalram_pages). This totalram_pages can be modified during vario=
> us
> > > initcall-s phase and this can cause miscalculated image_size.
> > >=20
> > > For example, when CMA is being used, init_cma_reserved_pageblock t=
> ries
> > > to change the totalram_pages and this job is done during core_init=
> call.
> > > In order words, the totalram_pages doesn't take CMA reserved pages=
> into
> > > account when image_size is calculated and it can be too small.
> > >=20
> > > Move pm_init and pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync so that it hap=
> pens
> > > after all other initcall-s change the totalram_pages.
> > >=20
> > > Reported-by: Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Wonhong Kwon <wonhong.kwon@lge.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >=20
> >=20
> > I'm seeing one too on powerpc:
> >=20
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000030
> > Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000002e4094
> > Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> > SMP NR_CPUS=3D2048 NUMA pSeries
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 5 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-next-20151015-50217-g=
> e2be40d-dirty #37
> > task: c0000001fefc0000 ti: c0000001fb000000 task.ti: c0000001fb000000
> > NIP: c0000000002e4094 LR: c000000000c79dd4 CTR: c000000000c79d90
> > REGS: c0000001fb003900 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (4.3.0-rc5-next-20151015=
> -50217-ge2be40d-dirty)
> > MSR: 8000000100009032 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 28000882 XER: 20000000
> > CFAR: c0000000000d117c DAR: 0000000000000030 DSISR: 40000000 SOFTE: 1=20
> > GPR00: c00000000000b074 c0000001fb003b80 c000000000e93800 000000000000000=
> 0=20
> > GPR04: c000000000d15c80 0000000000000000 00000001ff150000 000000000000002=
> 6=20
> > GPR08: c000000000d0f748 c000000000f41a10 c000000000d0f8e8 c000000000abc59=
> d=20
> > GPR12: c000000000b42400 c00000000fdc1680 c00000000000b960 000000000000000=
> 0=20
> > GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000000=
> 0=20
> > GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000000=
> 0=20
> > GPR24: 0000000000000000 c000000000de0360 c000000000c45d28 000000000000000=
> 0=20
> > GPR28: c000000000deca80 c000000000d103c0 c0000001fbc905c0 c000000000d103c=
> 0=20
> > NIP [c0000000002e4094] .sysfs_create_file_ns+0x4/0x50
> > LR [c000000000c79dd4] .__machine_initcall_pseries_apo_pm_init+0x44/0x60
> > Call Trace:
> > [c0000001fb003b80] [c0000000004852cc] .kasprintf+0x2c/0x40 (unreliable)
> > [c0000001fb003bf0] [c00000000000b074] .do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x250
> > [c0000001fb003ce0] [c000000000c64560] .kernel_init_freeable+0x268/0x348
> > [c0000001fb003db0] [c00000000000b97c] .kernel_init+0x1c/0x140
> > [c0000001fb003e30] [c0000000000095ac] .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0xac
> > Instruction dump:
> > 419e001c 3ce2ffa8 38e7be60 4bfffea4 3ce2ffa8 38e7bea8 4bfffe9c 3ce2ffa8=
> =20
> > 38e7bea8 4bfffe8c 60000000 2c230000 <e8630030> 41820028 2fa30000 419e0020=
> =20
> > ---[ end trace d2a742ce359651dd ]---
> >=20
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=3D0x0000000b
> >=20
> >=20
> > Which starts at:
> >=20
> > static int __init apo_pm_init(void)
> > {
> > return (sysfs_create_file(power_kobj, &auto_poweron_attr.attr));
> > }
> > machine_device_initcall(pseries, apo_pm_init);
> >=20
> > And seems to be caused by power_kobj being NULL:
> >=20
> > 0:mon> d $power_kobj
> > c000000000f41a10 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 |................|
>
> Yes, power_kobj is one of the other objects created by pm_init() and
> which, evidently, needs to be available much earlier than late_initcall.
> The patch below works for me, though I don't use hibernate on this
> machine, so that part is untested.
Sorry about the breakage and thanks for identifying the problematic commit.
I've dropped that commit from my tree.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Kwon (권원홍) <wonhong.kwon@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-16 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qk0hP-555-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1247611 |
Dear Thierry, > -----Original Message----- > From: Thierry Reding [mailto:thierry.reding@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 6:22 PM > To: Rafael J. Wysocki; Wonhong Kwon > Cc: Len Brown; Pavel Machek; linux-next@vger.kernel.org; linux- > pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Runtime PM causes oops on next-20151015 > > Hi Rafael, Wonhong, > > Todays linux-next breaks rather spectacularly for drivers using runtime PM. > The culprit seems to be this commit: > > commit 7d24068e144adc03b805806645d732cf79488717 > Author: Wonhong Kwon <wonhongkwon@gmail.com> > Date: Tue Oct 6 10:10:20 2015 +0900 > > PM / hibernate: Move pm_init/pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync > > pm_init is being invoked by core_initcall and > hibernate_image_size_init > calculates preferred image size (image_size) based on total > pages > (totalram_pages). This totalram_pages can be modified during > various > initcall-s phase and this can cause miscalculated image_size. > > For example, when CMA is being used, init_cma_reserved_pageblock > tries > to change the totalram_pages and this job is done during > core_initcall. > In order words, the totalram_pages doesn't take CMA reserved > pages into > account when image_size is calculated and it can be too small. > > Move pm_init and pm_disk_init to late_initcall_sync so that it > happens > after all other initcall-s change the totalram_pages. > > Reported-by: Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com> > Signed-off-by: Wonhong Kwon <wonhong.kwon@lge.com> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > I can't reply to it directly because I don't have it in any of my mail > boxes (it seems to have been sent only to the linux-pm mailing list, even > Google finds only a single match). > > Here's an extract of the oops: > > [ 1.395928] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > virtual address 00000100 > [ 1.404013] pgd = ffffffc000e0e000 > [ 1.407417] [00000100] *pgd=000000013c007003, > *pud=000000013c007003, *pmd=000000013c008003, *pte=0060000050041707 > [ 1.417746] Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > [ 1.423316] Modules linked in: > [ 1.426400] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5- > next-20151015+ #1338 > [ 1.434138] Hardware name: NVIDIA Tegra210 P2371 (P2180/P2597) > reference board (DT) > [ 1.441789] task: ffffffc0bc0a8000 ti: ffffffc0bc084000 task.ti: > ffffffc0bc084000 > [ 1.449280] PC is at __queue_work+0x2c/0x240 > [ 1.453551] LR is at queue_work_on+0x60/0x78 > ... > [ 1.836517] Call trace: > [ 1.838968] [<ffffffc0000b4134>] __queue_work+0x2c/0x240 > [ 1.844280] [<ffffffc0000b43a4>] queue_work_on+0x5c/0x78 > [ 1.849599] [<ffffffc00052e508>] rpm_idle+0xc0/0x140 > [ 1.854565] [<ffffffc00052e5dc>] __pm_runtime_idle+0x54/0x98 > [ 1.860229] [<ffffffc00052414c>] driver_probe_device+0x164/0x2f8 > [ 1.866236] [<ffffffc000524378>] __driver_attach+0x98/0xa0 > [ 1.871724] [<ffffffc00052231c>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0xa0 > [ 1.877294] [<ffffffc000523ab4>] driver_attach+0x1c/0x28 > [ 1.882608] [<ffffffc0005236e4>] bus_add_driver+0x1cc/0x238 > [ 1.888180] [<ffffffc000524b1c>] driver_register+0x5c/0xf8 > [ 1.893675] [<ffffffc000431800>] > mipi_dsi_driver_register_full+0x50/0x60 > [ 1.900374] [<ffffffc000ba1570>] panel_simple_init+0x2c/0x44 > [ 1.906035] [<ffffffc000082934>] do_one_initcall+0x8c/0x1a0 > [ 1.911612] [<ffffffc000b80aa8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x150/0x1f8 > [ 1.917711] [<ffffffc0007f78fc>] kernel_init+0xc/0xe0 > > Instrumenting the code shows that pm_wq (passed to queue_work in the > rpm_idle() function) is NULL at this point. This matches up with the > change done in the above-mentioned commit, since now pm_wq only gets > initialized at late_initcall time, whereas all built-in drivers will > already be probed at device_initcall time. So I suspect that this is going > to cause crashes on a whole lot of systems (essentially every system that > tries to use runtime PM from a built-in driver). I should've considered rumtime PM. Really sorry for bothering you. > > Given the commit message I suspect that the right fix would be to split > pm_init() into two functions, one that initializes the hibernation image > and another with the PM core initialization. The pm_hibernate_init() is > probably going to work fine as late_initcall (I assume this was tested) > but the rest should probably stay at core_initcall. I agree that rest of pm_init() should stay at core_initcall and only hibernation_image_size_init() goes to late_initcall. > > I can provide a patch for the latter if everyone agrees that it's the > right thing, but in the meantime, can you please drop the above patch from > your tree to unbreak linux-next for all affected users? > > Thanks, > Thierry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web