Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1242107 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding

Started byViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
First post2015-10-08 11:30 +0200
Last post2015-10-08 11:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-08 11:30 +0200

#1242107 — Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2015-10-08 11:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding
Message-ID<qhfGp-7Lv-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Rob,

On 15-09-15, 08:17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-09-15, 15:22, Rob Herring wrote:
> > What if we have a 2nd device and supply rail? For example, what if the
> > L2$ has a separate rail from the cores but is linked to the OPPs.
> 
> Right, so that is the case with the Mediatek SoC as well, AFAIR. How
> do we plan to treat L2 devices? For example, in the mediatek cpufreq
> driver, they change L2's supplies together with CPUs.
> 
> One way to get that done, with such very closely bound devices is to
> add two regulators:
> 
> cpu-supply = ...;
> l2-supply = ...;
> 
> And then a property in OPP table:
> 
> supply-name = "cpu", "l2";
> 
> And maybe fix the order in which the supplies which be updated, based
> on the order in which entries are present in the above property.
> 
> Any other way you suggest for doing that ?
> 
> > Remind me of when do we have multiple regulators for a cpu?
> 
> I haven't seen that yet, but its more like what I explained above.
> i.e. one for the CPU and other one for the L2 cache.
> 
> But, these bindings do apply for other devices as well, where it
> should be very much possible.

Not sure if you still have any objections to this patch?

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web