Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1242015 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/3] page: add new flags "PG_movable" and add interfaces to control these pages

Started byVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
First post2015-10-08 09:30 +0200
Last post2015-10-08 09:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/3] page: add new flags "PG_movable" and add interfaces  to control these pages Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-10-08 09:30 +0200

#1242015 — Re: [PATCH 1/3] page: add new flags "PG_movable" and add interfaces to control these pages

FromVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Date2015-10-08 09:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] page: add new flags "PG_movable" and add interfaces to control these pages
Message-ID<qhdOh-553-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 10/08/2015 08:35 AM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> This patch add PG_movable to mark a page as movable.
> And when system call migrate function, it will call the interfaces isolate,
> put and migrate to control it.
>
> There is a patch for page migrate interface in LKML.  But for zsmalloc,
> it is too deep inside the file system.  So I add another one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/mm_types.h   |  6 ++++++
>   include/linux/page-flags.h |  3 +++
>   mm/compaction.c            |  6 ++++++
>   mm/debug.c                 |  1 +
>   mm/migrate.c               | 17 +++++++++++++----
>   mm/vmscan.c                |  2 +-
>   6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 3d6baa7..132afb0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>   #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>   #include <linux/uprobes.h>
>   #include <linux/page-flags-layout.h>
> +#include <linux/migrate_mode.h>
>   #include <asm/page.h>
>   #include <asm/mmu.h>
>
> @@ -196,6 +197,11 @@ struct page {
>   #ifdef LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
>   	int _last_cpupid;
>   #endif
> +
> +	int (*isolate)(struct page *page);
> +	void (*put)(struct page *page);
> +	int (*migrate)(struct page *page, struct page *newpage, int force,
> +		       enum migrate_mode mode);

Three new function pointers in a struct page? No way! Nowadays it has 
around 64 bytes IIRC and we do quite some crazy stuff to keep it packed.
We can't just like this add extra 24 bytes of overhead per 4096 bytes of 
useful data.

>   }
>   /*
>    * The struct page can be forced to be double word aligned so that atomic ops
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> index 416509e..d91e98a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ enum pageflags {
>   	PG_young,
>   	PG_idle,
>   #endif
> +	PG_movable,		/* MOVABLE */

Page flag space is also a rare resource and we shouldn't add new ones if 
it's possible to do otherwise - and it should be in this case.

Since Sergey already responded to the cover letter with links to the 
prior relevant series, I just wanted to point out the biggest reasons 
why this cannot be accepted technically.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web