Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1241914 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc2: reset dwc2 core before dwc2_get_hwparams()

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc2: reset dwc2 core before dwc2_get_hwparams() Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2015-10-08 03:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc2: reset dwc2 core before dwc2_get_hwparams() John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-09 23:20 +0200

#1241914 — Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc2: reset dwc2 core before dwc2_get_hwparams()

John,

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:02 PM, John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com> wrote:
> On 10/1/2015 1:50 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:19 PM, John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Yunzhi,
>>>
>>> My concern is with the delays due to calling the dwc2_core_reset
>>> during probe. You could factor out the assertion of the core
>>> soft reset from the dwc2_core_reset and just use that before
>>> calling dwc2_get_hwparams().
>>>
>>> You had previously addressed the lengthy probe time issue here:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=142357721304377
>>>
>>> This reducing delays patch looks reasonable to me and I think it
>>> should get merged also. I'll do some testing with it later this
>>> week.
>>
>> Note: you can also avoid the extra reset during probe with something
>> like <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/303152/>.  I'm
>> happy to post that up if you want, though it depends on lyz's patch.
>>
>> ...in Chrome OS we've also just landed lyz's patch to reduce delays.
>> If there's any fallout I'll report on the list.
>>
>> -Doug
>>
>
>
> Yes, I appreciate if you could submit that. I'd like to merge lyz's
> reduce delays, lyz's bug fix for hwparams, and your fix for double
> reset.

OK, I've posted things up.  Let me know what you think.  Note that I
took v2 of lyz's patch (not v3) since I liked it better.


> The gadget side will also need something similar which I can do if
> needed. Do you guys run gadget mode?

I don't personally run in gadget mode.  I think it's possible to get
rk3288 to do it on one of the two ports, but I don't have it setup.


-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1243662

On 10/7/2015 5:50 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> John,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:02 PM, John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com> wrote:
>> On 10/1/2015 1:50 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> John,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:19 PM, John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Yunzhi,
>>>>
>>>> My concern is with the delays due to calling the dwc2_core_reset
>>>> during probe. You could factor out the assertion of the core
>>>> soft reset from the dwc2_core_reset and just use that before
>>>> calling dwc2_get_hwparams().
>>>>
>>>> You had previously addressed the lengthy probe time issue here:
>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=142357721304377
>>>>
>>>> This reducing delays patch looks reasonable to me and I think it
>>>> should get merged also. I'll do some testing with it later this
>>>> week.
>>>
>>> Note: you can also avoid the extra reset during probe with something
>>> like <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/303152/>.  I'm
>>> happy to post that up if you want, though it depends on lyz's patch.
>>>
>>> ...in Chrome OS we've also just landed lyz's patch to reduce delays.
>>> If there's any fallout I'll report on the list.
>>>
>>> -Doug
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I appreciate if you could submit that. I'd like to merge lyz's
>> reduce delays, lyz's bug fix for hwparams, and your fix for double
>> reset.
> 
> OK, I've posted things up.  Let me know what you think.  Note that I
> took v2 of lyz's patch (not v3) since I liked it better.
> 
> 
>> The gadget side will also need something similar which I can do if
>> needed. Do you guys run gadget mode?
> 
> I don't personally run in gadget mode.  I think it's possible to get
> rk3288 to do it on one of the two ports, but I don't have it setup.
> 

No problem. I can make the gadget changes.

Thanks for submitting this.

Regards,
John

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web