Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1241751 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-07 21:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-08 01:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] PCI: IOV: reread SRIOV_NUM_VF after enabling ARI Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2015-10-07 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] PCI: IOV: reread SRIOV_NUM_VF after enabling ARI Ben Shelton <benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com> - 2015-10-07 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] PCI: IOV: reread SRIOV_NUM_VF after enabling ARI Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2015-10-08 01:20 +0200
| From | Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 21:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] PCI: IOV: reread SRIOV_NUM_VF after enabling ARI |
| Message-ID | <qh2zw-5LZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Ben,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:55:00PM -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
> For some SR-IOV devices, the number of available virtual functions
> increases after enabling ARI. Currently, SRIOV_NUM_VF is read and saved
> off before the ARI control bit is enabled. This causes an issue when VFs
> are enabled.
>
> At device init, SRIOV_INITIAL_VF and SRIOV_NUM_VF are specified to contain
> the number of available VFs for the device. sriov_enable() does a sanity
> check that PCI_SRIOV_INITIAL_VF is not greater than iov->total_VFs, the
> saved-off value of SRIOV_NUM_VF. Since the value of both SRIOV_INITIAL_VF
> and SRIOV_NUM_VF has increased after enabling the ARI bit, the check fails,
> and the VFs cannot be enabled.
>
> To fix the issue, after ARI is enabled for a device, reread SRIOV_NUM_VF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton <benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/iov.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> index ee0ebff..88b1959 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> struct pci_sriov *iov;
> struct resource *res;
> struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + bool total_needs_reread = false;
>
> if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END &&
> pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT)
> @@ -409,12 +410,18 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> goto found;
>
> pdev = NULL;
> - if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus))
> + if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus)) {
> ctrl |= PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_ARI;
> + total_needs_reread = true;
> + }
>
> found:
> pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_CTRL, ctrl);
> pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF, 0);
> +
> + if (total_needs_reread)
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF, &total);
Can we just *move* the PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF read from its original
location and do it unconditionally here? I don't think we use "total"
for anything in the interim, and it'd be nice if we could do this
without the "total_needs_reread" flag.
> pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, &offset);
> pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, &stride);
> if (!offset || (total > 1 && !stride))
> --
> 1.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Shelton <benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qh3vA-78b-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1241751 |
Hi Bjorn,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:29:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:55:00PM -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
> > For some SR-IOV devices, the number of available virtual functions
> > increases after enabling ARI. Currently, SRIOV_NUM_VF is read and saved
> > off before the ARI control bit is enabled. This causes an issue when VFs
> > are enabled.
> >
> > At device init, SRIOV_INITIAL_VF and SRIOV_NUM_VF are specified to contain
> > the number of available VFs for the device. sriov_enable() does a sanity
> > check that PCI_SRIOV_INITIAL_VF is not greater than iov->total_VFs, the
> > saved-off value of SRIOV_NUM_VF. Since the value of both SRIOV_INITIAL_VF
> > and SRIOV_NUM_VF has increased after enabling the ARI bit, the check fails,
> > and the VFs cannot be enabled.
> >
> > To fix the issue, after ARI is enabled for a device, reread SRIOV_NUM_VF.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton <benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/iov.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > index ee0ebff..88b1959 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> > struct pci_sriov *iov;
> > struct resource *res;
> > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > + bool total_needs_reread = false;
> >
> > if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END &&
> > pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT)
> > @@ -409,12 +410,18 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> > goto found;
> >
> > pdev = NULL;
> > - if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus))
> > + if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus)) {
> > ctrl |= PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_ARI;
> > + total_needs_reread = true;
> > + }
> >
> > found:
> > pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_CTRL, ctrl);
> > pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF, 0);
> > +
> > + if (total_needs_reread)
> > + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF, &total);
>
> Can we just *move* the PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF read from its original
> location and do it unconditionally here? I don't think we use "total"
> for anything in the interim, and it'd be nice if we could do this
> without the "total_needs_reread" flag.
The only thing we do with 'total' is return early if it's read as 0
(i.e. for a device that does not support any VFs). If we just move the
read to here, a PCI device with no VFs would have its PCI_SRIOV_CTRL
config word written before PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF is read as 0 and
sriov_init() returns. The reread preserves the original behavior.
If the change in behavior is OK, I'll make the change and submit a v2.
Thanks,
Ben
>
> > pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET, &offset);
> > pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_VF_STRIDE, &stride);
> > if (!offset || (total > 1 && !stride))
> > --
> > 1.9.5
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 01:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qh6a6-2y3-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1241782 |
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:21:36PM -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:29:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:55:00PM -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
> > > For some SR-IOV devices, the number of available virtual functions
> > > increases after enabling ARI. Currently, SRIOV_NUM_VF is read and saved
> > > off before the ARI control bit is enabled. This causes an issue when VFs
> > > are enabled.
> > >
> > > At device init, SRIOV_INITIAL_VF and SRIOV_NUM_VF are specified to contain
> > > the number of available VFs for the device. sriov_enable() does a sanity
> > > check that PCI_SRIOV_INITIAL_VF is not greater than iov->total_VFs, the
> > > saved-off value of SRIOV_NUM_VF. Since the value of both SRIOV_INITIAL_VF
> > > and SRIOV_NUM_VF has increased after enabling the ARI bit, the check fails,
> > > and the VFs cannot be enabled.
> > >
> > > To fix the issue, after ARI is enabled for a device, reread SRIOV_NUM_VF.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton <benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/iov.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > index ee0ebff..88b1959 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> > > struct pci_sriov *iov;
> > > struct resource *res;
> > > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > + bool total_needs_reread = false;
> > >
> > > if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END &&
> > > pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT)
> > > @@ -409,12 +410,18 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> > > goto found;
> > >
> > > pdev = NULL;
> > > - if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus))
> > > + if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus)) {
> > > ctrl |= PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_ARI;
> > > + total_needs_reread = true;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > found:
> > > pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_CTRL, ctrl);
> > > pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF, 0);
> > > +
> > > + if (total_needs_reread)
> > > + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF, &total);
> >
> > Can we just *move* the PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF read from its original
> > location and do it unconditionally here? I don't think we use "total"
> > for anything in the interim, and it'd be nice if we could do this
> > without the "total_needs_reread" flag.
>
> The only thing we do with 'total' is return early if it's read as 0
> (i.e. for a device that does not support any VFs). If we just move the
> read to here, a PCI device with no VFs would have its PCI_SRIOV_CTRL
> config word written before PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF is read as 0 and
> sriov_init() returns. The reread preserves the original behavior.
>
> If the change in behavior is OK, I'll make the change and submit a v2.
I think that's OK. We do return some other errors after modifying
PCI_SRIOV_CTRL, so I don't know that this would be any worse.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web