Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1241748 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-07 21:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-07 22:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2015-10-07 21:30 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> - 2015-10-07 22:00 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2015-10-07 22:40 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> - 2015-10-07 22:50 +0200
| From | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 21:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch |
| Message-ID | <qh2zv-5LZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hey Jens,
Please git pull an update branch to your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch (which
oddly I don't see does not have the previous pull?)
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-jens-4.3
which has two fixes - one where we use the Xen blockfront EFI driver and
don't release all the requests, the other if the allocation of resources
for a particular state failed - we would go back 'Closing' and assume that
an structure would be allocated while in fact it may not be - and crash.
Please pull!
P.S.
The patches also have 'stable@vger.kernel.org' on them.
drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Cathy Avery (1):
xen-blkfront: check for null drvdata in blkback_changed (XenbusStateClosing)
Roger Pau Monne (1):
xen/blkback: free requests on disconnection
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 22:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch |
| Message-ID | <qh32z-6kb-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1241748 |
On 10/07/2015 01:26 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Hey Jens, > > Please git pull an update branch to your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch (which > oddly I don't see does not have the previous pull?) > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-jens-4.3 > > which has two fixes - one where we use the Xen blockfront EFI driver and > don't release all the requests, the other if the allocation of resources > for a particular state failed - we would go back 'Closing' and assume that > an structure would be allocated while in fact it may not be - and crash. > > Please pull! > > P.S. > The patches also have 'stable@vger.kernel.org' on them. > > drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > Cathy Avery (1): > xen-blkfront: check for null drvdata in blkback_changed (XenbusStateClosing) > > Roger Pau Monne (1): > xen/blkback: free requests on disconnection There's only one commit in that pull request, the patch from Roger is already in mainline from the last pull request. I think your mistake is looking at for-4.3/drivers - this branch is defunct as soon as Linus has pulled the initial bits for 4.3. After that, for-linus is the branch that carries fixes for the _current_ branch. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 22:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch |
| Message-ID | <qh3Fg-7jt-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1241772 |
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:53:01PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/07/2015 01:26 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >Hey Jens, > > > >Please git pull an update branch to your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch (which > >oddly I don't see does not have the previous pull?) > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-jens-4.3 > > > >which has two fixes - one where we use the Xen blockfront EFI driver and > >don't release all the requests, the other if the allocation of resources > >for a particular state failed - we would go back 'Closing' and assume that > >an structure would be allocated while in fact it may not be - and crash. > > > >Please pull! > > > >P.S. > >The patches also have 'stable@vger.kernel.org' on them. > > > > drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 ++- > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > >Cathy Avery (1): > > xen-blkfront: check for null drvdata in blkback_changed (XenbusStateClosing) > > > >Roger Pau Monne (1): > > xen/blkback: free requests on disconnection > > There's only one commit in that pull request, the patch from Roger is > already in mainline from the last pull request. I think your mistake is Hm, indeed I see it now (after doing git pull from non-work machine). > looking at for-4.3/drivers - this branch is defunct as soon as Linus has > pulled the initial bits for 4.3. After that, for-linus is the branch that > carries fixes for the _current_ branch. Aaaa! That I had no clue about. OK, I will fix my workflow. Do you want me to repost this basing it on the 'for-linus' branch? Thanks! > > -- > Jens Axboe > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 22:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] (xen) for-jens-4.3 for your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch |
| Message-ID | <qh3OW-7uS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1241792 |
On 10/07/2015 02:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:53:01PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 10/07/2015 01:26 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> Hey Jens, >>> >>> Please git pull an update branch to your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch (which >>> oddly I don't see does not have the previous pull?) >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-jens-4.3 >>> >>> which has two fixes - one where we use the Xen blockfront EFI driver and >>> don't release all the requests, the other if the allocation of resources >>> for a particular state failed - we would go back 'Closing' and assume that >>> an structure would be allocated while in fact it may not be - and crash. >>> >>> Please pull! >>> >>> P.S. >>> The patches also have 'stable@vger.kernel.org' on them. >>> >>> drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >>> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 ++- >>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >>> >>> Cathy Avery (1): >>> xen-blkfront: check for null drvdata in blkback_changed (XenbusStateClosing) >>> >>> Roger Pau Monne (1): >>> xen/blkback: free requests on disconnection >> >> There's only one commit in that pull request, the patch from Roger is >> already in mainline from the last pull request. I think your mistake is > > Hm, indeed I see it now (after doing git pull from non-work machine). > >> looking at for-4.3/drivers - this branch is defunct as soon as Linus has >> pulled the initial bits for 4.3. After that, for-linus is the branch that >> carries fixes for the _current_ branch. > > Aaaa! That I had no clue about. OK, I will fix my workflow. Do you want > me to repost this basing it on the 'for-linus' branch? No the current one is fine, it's only a concern if there are other changes in your branch compared to mine. I just got a different diffstat for this one than you listed, so I had to check it more thoroughly. I have pulled it in. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web