Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1241283 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: fix edge EOI and IOAPIC reconfig race

Started byPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
First post2015-10-07 11:30 +0200
Last post2015-10-07 17:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: fix edge EOI and IOAPIC reconfig race Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-10-07 11:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: fix edge EOI and IOAPIC reconfig race Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2015-10-07 17:10 +0200

#1241283 — Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: fix edge EOI and IOAPIC reconfig race

FromPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date2015-10-07 11:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: fix edge EOI and IOAPIC reconfig race
Message-ID<qgTcS-DX-23@gated-at.bofh.it>

On 13/08/2015 15:46, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> +	if (kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu))
> +		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> +

The call to sync_pir_to_irr belongs more in vcpu_scan_ioapic, I think.

More importantly, I think that KVM_REQ_EVENT is a latent bug for
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_lapic as well, so the call to kvm_make_request should
go in vmx_sync_pir_to_irr or in a new kvm_sync_pir_to_irr wrapper.

> +			    (e->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_EDGE_TRIG &&
> +			     kvm_apic_pending_eoi(vcpu, e->fields.vector)))

Should we test again here that kvm_irq_has_notifier(ioapic->kvm,
KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, index), to avoid unnecessarily marking other
edge-triggered interrupts?

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1241579

FromRadim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Date2015-10-07 17:10 +0200
Message-ID<qgYvU-8pw-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1241283
2015-10-07 11:29+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 13/08/2015 15:46, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> +	if (kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu))
>> +		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
>> +
> 
> The call to sync_pir_to_irr belongs more in vcpu_scan_ioapic, I think.

Will do so in v2.

> More importantly, I think that KVM_REQ_EVENT is a latent bug for
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_lapic as well, so the call to kvm_make_request should
> go in vmx_sync_pir_to_irr or in a new kvm_sync_pir_to_irr wrapper.

True, thanks.  I'll make the request in kvm_apic_update_irr (unless
you'd prefer to have it in new kvm_sync_pir_to_irr).

>> +			    (e->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_EDGE_TRIG &&
>> +			     kvm_apic_pending_eoi(vcpu, e->fields.vector)))
> 
> Should we test again here that kvm_irq_has_notifier(ioapic->kvm,
> KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, index), to avoid unnecessarily marking other
> edge-triggered interrupts?

Other edge-triggered interrupts are skipped by a previous condition:

  if (e->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG ||
      kvm_irq_has_notifier(ioapic->kvm, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, index) ||
      index == RTC_GSI)
         [we're here]

I think it is ok to ignore level-triggered RTC, but we do want to
include edge-triggered.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web