Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1234224 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-28 17:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-30 18:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2015-09-28 17:00 +0200
RE: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> - 2015-09-30 10:10 +0200
Re: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2015-09-30 15:20 +0200
RE: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> - 2015-09-30 18:50 +0200
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 17:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? |
| Message-ID | <qdI4i-2z9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
How to figure out which variables can I collect at function return? None? I think we need a better error message :-) [root@zoo ~]# perf probe -V getname_flags%return Return probe must be on the head of a real function. Debuginfo analysis failed. Error: Failed to show vars. [root@zoo ~]# - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 10:10 +0200 |
| Subject | RE: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? |
| Message-ID | <qekCD-7xs-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1234224 |
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:acme@kernel.org]
>
>How to figure out which variables can I collect at function return?
>None?
At first, it seems the below pattern failed to get the probe point itself,
because you're specifying the return point of an inlined function, which
is nowhere.
If you give a function which has actual instance, perf-probe may show
the variables which will be accessable in the entry of the function as below.
$ sudo ./perf probe -V "vfs_read%return"
Available variables at vfs_read%return
@<vfs_read+0>
char* buf
loff_t* pos
size_t count
struct file* file
However, this may not work on the arguments passed by registers,
since those may be already broken by the operations in the function.
So, to get correct accessible variables at return, you must give an actual
line number in the function currently.
$ sudo ./perf probe -L vfs_read
<vfs_read@/home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux-3/fs/read_write.c:0>
0 ssize_t vfs_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, lof
1 {
ssize_t ret;
4 if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
5 return -EBADF;
6 if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_READ))
7 return -EINVAL;
8 if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buf, count)))
9 return -EFAULT;
11 ret = rw_verify_area(READ, file, pos, count);
12 if (ret >= 0) {
count = ret;
14 ret = __vfs_read(file, buf, count, pos);
15 if (ret > 0) {
16 fsnotify_access(file);
17 add_rchar(current, ret);
}
19 inc_syscr(current);
}
return ret;
23 }
$ sudo ./perf probe -V vfs_read:23
Available variables at vfs_read:23
@<vfs_read+214>
char* buf
loff_t* pos
size_t count
struct file* file
>
>I think we need a better error message :-)
>
>[root@zoo ~]# perf probe -V getname_flags%return Return probe must be on the head of a real function.
It seems that perf probe said " Return probe must be on the head of a real function."
So this means it can not find the given probe point because the %return is not
put on the entry of the function which has actual instance.
Thanks.
>Debuginfo analysis failed.
> Error: Failed to show vars.
>[root@zoo ~]#
>
>
>- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 15:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? |
| Message-ID | <qepsC-63w-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1235870 |
Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:05:09AM +0000, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI escreveu:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:acme@kernel.org]
> >
> >How to figure out which variables can I collect at function return?
> >None?
>
> At first, it seems the below pattern failed to get the probe point itself,
> because you're specifying the return point of an inlined function, which
> is nowhere.
Would be really nice to have this warning emitted to the user, as well
as bits and pieces of the following explanations.
- Arnaldo
> If you give a function which has actual instance, perf-probe may show
> the variables which will be accessable in the entry of the function as below.
>
> $ sudo ./perf probe -V "vfs_read%return"
> Available variables at vfs_read%return
> @<vfs_read+0>
> char* buf
> loff_t* pos
> size_t count
> struct file* file
>
> However, this may not work on the arguments passed by registers,
> since those may be already broken by the operations in the function.
>
> So, to get correct accessible variables at return, you must give an actual
> line number in the function currently.
>
> $ sudo ./perf probe -L vfs_read
> <vfs_read@/home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux-3/fs/read_write.c:0>
> 0 ssize_t vfs_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, lof
> 1 {
> ssize_t ret;
>
> 4 if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
> 5 return -EBADF;
> 6 if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_READ))
> 7 return -EINVAL;
> 8 if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buf, count)))
> 9 return -EFAULT;
>
> 11 ret = rw_verify_area(READ, file, pos, count);
> 12 if (ret >= 0) {
> count = ret;
> 14 ret = __vfs_read(file, buf, count, pos);
> 15 if (ret > 0) {
> 16 fsnotify_access(file);
> 17 add_rchar(current, ret);
> }
> 19 inc_syscr(current);
> }
>
> return ret;
> 23 }
>
> $ sudo ./perf probe -V vfs_read:23
> Available variables at vfs_read:23
> @<vfs_read+214>
> char* buf
> loff_t* pos
> size_t count
> struct file* file
>
>
> >
> >I think we need a better error message :-)
> >
> >[root@zoo ~]# perf probe -V getname_flags%return Return probe must be on the head of a real function.
>
> It seems that perf probe said " Return probe must be on the head of a real function."
> So this means it can not find the given probe point because the %return is not
> put on the entry of the function which has actual instance.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> >Debuginfo analysis failed.
> > Error: Failed to show vars.
> >[root@zoo ~]#
> >
> >
> >- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 18:50 +0200 |
| Subject | RE: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? |
| Message-ID | <qesJR-2eW-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1236279 |
RnJvbTogQXJuYWxkbyBDYXJ2YWxobyBkZSBNZWxvIFttYWlsdG86YWNtZUBrZXJuZWwub3JnXQ0K Pg0KPkVtIFdlZCwgU2VwIDMwLCAyMDE1IGF0IDA4OjA1OjA5QU0gKzAwMDAsIOW5s+advumbheW3 syAvIEhJUkFNQVRV77yMTUFTQU1JIGVzY3JldmV1Og0KPj4gRnJvbTogQXJuYWxkbyBDYXJ2YWxo byBkZSBNZWxvIFttYWlsdG86YWNtZUBrZXJuZWwub3JnXQ0KPj4gPg0KPj4gPkhvdyB0byBmaWd1 cmUgb3V0IHdoaWNoIHZhcmlhYmxlcyBjYW4gSSBjb2xsZWN0IGF0IGZ1bmN0aW9uIHJldHVybj8N Cj4+ID5Ob25lPw0KPj4NCj4+IEF0IGZpcnN0LCBpdCBzZWVtcyB0aGUgYmVsb3cgcGF0dGVybiBm YWlsZWQgdG8gZ2V0IHRoZSBwcm9iZSBwb2ludA0KPj4gaXRzZWxmLCBiZWNhdXNlIHlvdSdyZSBz cGVjaWZ5aW5nIHRoZSByZXR1cm4gcG9pbnQgb2YgYW4gaW5saW5lZA0KPj4gZnVuY3Rpb24sIHdo aWNoIGlzIG5vd2hlcmUuDQo+DQo+V291bGQgYmUgcmVhbGx5IG5pY2UgdG8gaGF2ZSB0aGlzIHdh cm5pbmcgZW1pdHRlZCB0byB0aGUgdXNlciwgYXMgd2VsbCBhcyBiaXRzIGFuZCBwaWVjZXMgb2Yg dGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBleHBsYW5hdGlvbnMuDQoNCk9LLCBJJ2xsIGluY2x1ZGUgdGhpcyB0byB0 aGUgb3RoZXIgYnVnZml4ZXMuDQoNClRoYW5rcyENCg0K -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web