Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1231711 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-23 22:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-02 15:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 on this page of 22 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-23 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-24 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com> - 2015-09-24 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-24 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-25 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-25 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-26 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-26 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-28 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-28 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-09-28 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-28 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-09-29 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-29 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-09-29 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-29 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-29 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-29 04:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-30 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-30 04:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-30 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-10-02 15:00 +0200
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 05:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qegfD-1bp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1235710 |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:04:21PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:44:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > <> > > Already testing a kernel with those reverted. My current DAX patch > > stack is (bottom is first commit in stack): > > > > f672ae4 xfs: add ->pfn_mkwrite support for DAX > > 6855c23 xfs: remove DAX complete_unwritten callback > > e074bdf Revert "dax: fix race between simultaneous faults" > > 8ba0157 Revert "mm: take i_mmap_lock in unmap_mapping_range() for DAX" > > a2ce6a5 xfs: DAX does not use IO completion callbacks > > 246c52a xfs: update size during allocation for DAX > > 9d10e7b xfs: Don't use unwritten extents for DAX > > eaef807 xfs: factor out sector mapping. > > e7f2d50 xfs: introduce per-inode DAX enablement > > Dave, would you be willing to share these patches with me, even if they are > just RFC? I'm working through how to add equivalent support in both ext2 and > ext4, and a conceptual example in XFS would be really helpful. When I have code that works properly and isn't fundamentally broken, I'll post it. Hopefully within the next day. > Eric and Jan, if you guys have any spare cycles to help with the ext2/ext4 > bits, I certainly wouldn't say no. :) ext2 already does the block zeroing in allocation, so it only needs locking help... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qf86m-3NQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1235710 |
On Tue 29-09-15 20:04:21, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:44:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > <> > > Already testing a kernel with those reverted. My current DAX patch > > stack is (bottom is first commit in stack): > > > > f672ae4 xfs: add ->pfn_mkwrite support for DAX > > 6855c23 xfs: remove DAX complete_unwritten callback > > e074bdf Revert "dax: fix race between simultaneous faults" > > 8ba0157 Revert "mm: take i_mmap_lock in unmap_mapping_range() for DAX" > > a2ce6a5 xfs: DAX does not use IO completion callbacks > > 246c52a xfs: update size during allocation for DAX > > 9d10e7b xfs: Don't use unwritten extents for DAX > > eaef807 xfs: factor out sector mapping. > > e7f2d50 xfs: introduce per-inode DAX enablement > > Dave, would you be willing to share these patches with me, even if they are > just RFC? I'm working through how to add equivalent support in both ext2 and > ext4, and a conceptual example in XFS would be really helpful. > > Eric and Jan, if you guys have any spare cycles to help with the ext2/ext4 > bits, I certainly wouldn't say no. :) I'm sorry for being slow but I was on vacation or travelling for conferences the whole September (still at a conference now ;) so I'm in mostly just catching up with what's going on... But I can help with making necessary changes to ext4 to make DAX reliable there. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web