Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1231711 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault

Started byRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
First post2015-09-23 22:50 +0200
Last post2015-10-02 15:00 +0200
Articles 2 on this page of 22 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-23 22:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-24 05:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com> - 2015-09-24 11:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-24 18:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-25 05:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-25 20:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-26 01:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-26 05:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-28 03:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-28 12:20 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-09-28 14:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-28 23:40 +0200
                  Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-09-29 01:00 +0200
                    Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-29 04:20 +0200
                      Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-09-29 05:10 +0200
                        Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-29 06:20 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-29 00:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-29 04:50 +0200
                  Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-30 04:00 +0200
                  Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-30 04:10 +0200
                    Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-09-30 05:30 +0200
                    Re: [PATCH] dax: fix deadlock in __dax_fault Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-10-02 15:00 +0200

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#1235727

FromDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date2015-09-30 05:30 +0200
Message-ID<qegfD-1bp-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1235710
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:04:21PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:44:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> <>
> > Already testing a kernel with those reverted. My current DAX patch
> > stack is (bottom is first commit in stack):
> > 
> > f672ae4 xfs: add ->pfn_mkwrite support for DAX
> > 6855c23 xfs: remove DAX complete_unwritten callback
> > e074bdf Revert "dax: fix race between simultaneous faults"
> > 8ba0157 Revert "mm: take i_mmap_lock in unmap_mapping_range() for DAX"
> > a2ce6a5 xfs: DAX does not use IO completion callbacks
> > 246c52a xfs: update size during allocation for DAX
> > 9d10e7b xfs: Don't use unwritten extents for DAX
> > eaef807 xfs: factor out sector mapping.
> > e7f2d50 xfs: introduce per-inode DAX enablement
> 
> Dave, would you be willing to share these patches with me, even if they are
> just RFC?  I'm working through how to add equivalent support in both ext2 and
> ext4, and a conceptual example in XFS would be really helpful.

When I have code that works properly and isn't fundamentally broken,
I'll post it. Hopefully within the next day.

> Eric and Jan, if you guys have any spare cycles to help with the ext2/ext4
> bits, I certainly wouldn't say no.  :)

ext2 already does the block zeroing in allocation, so it only needs
locking help...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1238173

FromJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date2015-10-02 15:00 +0200
Message-ID<qf86m-3NQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1235710
On Tue 29-09-15 20:04:21, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:44:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> <>
> > Already testing a kernel with those reverted. My current DAX patch
> > stack is (bottom is first commit in stack):
> > 
> > f672ae4 xfs: add ->pfn_mkwrite support for DAX
> > 6855c23 xfs: remove DAX complete_unwritten callback
> > e074bdf Revert "dax: fix race between simultaneous faults"
> > 8ba0157 Revert "mm: take i_mmap_lock in unmap_mapping_range() for DAX"
> > a2ce6a5 xfs: DAX does not use IO completion callbacks
> > 246c52a xfs: update size during allocation for DAX
> > 9d10e7b xfs: Don't use unwritten extents for DAX
> > eaef807 xfs: factor out sector mapping.
> > e7f2d50 xfs: introduce per-inode DAX enablement
> 
> Dave, would you be willing to share these patches with me, even if they are
> just RFC?  I'm working through how to add equivalent support in both ext2 and
> ext4, and a conceptual example in XFS would be really helpful.
> 
> Eric and Jan, if you guys have any spare cycles to help with the ext2/ext4
> bits, I certainly wouldn't say no.  :)

I'm sorry for being slow but I was on vacation or travelling for
conferences the whole September (still at a conference now ;) so I'm in
mostly just catching up with what's going on... But I can help with making
necessary changes to ext4 to make DAX reliable there.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web