Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1235577 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-30 00:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-03 10:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] perf: change samples type to unsigned long long Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-09-30 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf: change samples type to unsigned long long Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2015-10-02 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf: change samples type to unsigned long long Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2015-10-02 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf: change samples type to unsigned long long "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-10-02 23:30 +0200
[tip:perf/core] perf record: Change 'record.samples' type to unsigned long long tip-bot for Yang Shi <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-10-03 10:00 +0200
| From | Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 00:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] perf: change samples type to unsigned long long |
| Message-ID | <qebfY-2wi-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
When run "perf record -e", the number of samples showed up is wrong on some
32 bit systems, i.e. powerpc and arm.
For example, run the below commands on 32 bit powerpc:
perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 malloc
perf record -e probe_libc:malloc -a ls
perf.data
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.036 MB perf.data (13829241621624967218 samples) ]
Actually, "perf script" just shows 21 samples. The number of samples is also
absurd since samples is long type, but it is printed as PRIu64.
Build test is run on x86-64, x86, aarch64, arm, mips, ppc and ppc64.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
---
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 142eeb3..e54aa4c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct record {
int realtime_prio;
bool no_buildid;
bool no_buildid_cache;
- long samples;
+ unsigned long long samples;
};
static int record__write(struct record *rec, void *bf, size_t size)
--
2.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qfdSq-3Vb-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1235577 |
Em Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:49:43PM -0700, Yang Shi escreveu:
> When run "perf record -e", the number of samples showed up is wrong on some
> 32 bit systems, i.e. powerpc and arm.
>
> For example, run the below commands on 32 bit powerpc:
>
> perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 malloc
> perf record -e probe_libc:malloc -a ls
> perf.data
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.036 MB perf.data (13829241621624967218 samples) ]
>
> Actually, "perf script" just shows 21 samples. The number of samples is also
> absurd since samples is long type, but it is printed as PRIu64.
>
> Build test is run on x86-64, x86, aarch64, arm, mips, ppc and ppc64.
Sure?
AR /tmp/build/perf/libperf.a
builtin-record.c: In function ‘__cmd_record’:
builtin-record.c:689:12: error: comparison between signed and unsigned
integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 142eeb3..e54aa4c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct record {
> int realtime_prio;
> bool no_buildid;
> bool no_buildid_cache;
> - long samples;
> + unsigned long long samples;
> };
>
> static int record__write(struct record *rec, void *bf, size_t size)
> --
> 2.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qfe25-46r-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1238541 |
Em Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 04:08:38PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:49:43PM -0700, Yang Shi escreveu:
> > When run "perf record -e", the number of samples showed up is wrong on some
> > 32 bit systems, i.e. powerpc and arm.
> >
> > For example, run the below commands on 32 bit powerpc:
> >
> > perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 malloc
> > perf record -e probe_libc:malloc -a ls
> > perf.data
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.036 MB perf.data (13829241621624967218 samples) ]
> >
> > Actually, "perf script" just shows 21 samples. The number of samples is also
> > absurd since samples is long type, but it is printed as PRIu64.
> >
> > Build test is run on x86-64, x86, aarch64, arm, mips, ppc and ppc64.
>
> Sure?
>
> AR /tmp/build/perf/libperf.a
> builtin-record.c: In function ‘__cmd_record’:
> builtin-record.c:689:12: error: comparison between signed and unsigned
> integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
You missed something important, I am fixing this and applying your
patch:
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 974065f8ce80..24ace2f318c1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
auxtrace_snapshot_enabled = 1;
for (;;) {
- int hits = rec->samples;
+ unsigned long long hits = rec->samples;
if (record__mmap_read_all(rec) < 0) {
auxtrace_snapshot_enabled = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-02 23:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qfg3V-6Xd-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1238542 |
On 10/2/2015 12:10 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 04:08:38PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:49:43PM -0700, Yang Shi escreveu:
>>> When run "perf record -e", the number of samples showed up is wrong on some
>>> 32 bit systems, i.e. powerpc and arm.
>>>
>>> For example, run the below commands on 32 bit powerpc:
>>>
>>> perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 malloc
>>> perf record -e probe_libc:malloc -a ls
>>> perf.data
>>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.036 MB perf.data (13829241621624967218 samples) ]
>>>
>>> Actually, "perf script" just shows 21 samples. The number of samples is also
>>> absurd since samples is long type, but it is printed as PRIu64.
>>>
>>> Build test is run on x86-64, x86, aarch64, arm, mips, ppc and ppc64.
>>
>> Sure?
>>
>> AR /tmp/build/perf/libperf.a
>> builtin-record.c: In function ‘__cmd_record’:
>> builtin-record.c:689:12: error: comparison between signed and unsigned
>> integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
>
> You missed something important, I am fixing this and applying your
> patch:
Thanks a lot. Yes, it was wrong, however, my compiler just throws a
warning instead of an error. And, the warning was hidden by my OE build
environment.
Regards,
Yang
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 974065f8ce80..24ace2f318c1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
>
> auxtrace_snapshot_enabled = 1;
> for (;;) {
> - int hits = rec->samples;
> + unsigned long long hits = rec->samples;
>
> if (record__mmap_read_all(rec) < 0) {
> auxtrace_snapshot_enabled = 0;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tip-bot for Yang Shi <tipbot@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-03 10:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [tip:perf/core] perf record: Change 'record.samples' type to unsigned long long |
| Message-ID | <qfpTA-40C-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1235577 |
Commit-ID: 9f065194e2a505bb6fd23946b410a0036e9de2ca
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/9f065194e2a505bb6fd23946b410a0036e9de2ca
Author: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:49:43 -0700
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:11:08 -0300
perf record: Change 'record.samples' type to unsigned long long
When run "perf record -e", the number of samples showed up is wrong on some
32 bit systems, i.e. powerpc and arm.
For example, run the below commands on 32 bit powerpc:
perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 malloc
perf record -e probe_libc:malloc -a ls perf.data
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.036 MB perf.data (13829241621624967218 samples) ]
Actually, "perf script" just shows 21 samples. The number of samples is also
absurd since samples is long type, but it is printed as PRIu64.
Build test ran on x86-64, x86, aarch64, arm, mips, ppc and ppc64.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443563383-4064-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org
[ Bumped the 'hits' var used together with record.samples to 'unsigned long long' too ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 5e01c07..24ace2f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct record {
int realtime_prio;
bool no_buildid;
bool no_buildid_cache;
- long samples;
+ unsigned long long samples;
};
static int record__write(struct record *rec, void *bf, size_t size)
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
auxtrace_snapshot_enabled = 1;
for (;;) {
- int hits = rec->samples;
+ unsigned long long hits = rec->samples;
if (record__mmap_read_all(rec) < 0) {
auxtrace_snapshot_enabled = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web