Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1231519 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-23 18:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-01 18:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> - 2015-09-30 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2015-09-30 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2015-09-30 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 18:20 +0200
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 18:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: at91_udc: mention proper dependency |
| Message-ID | <qbUCC-dg-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:40:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:15:28AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:42:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > While building allmodconfig on avr32 the build failed with the error: > > > "at91_pmc_base" [drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.ko] undefined! > > > > > > On checking the code it turned out that if CONFIG_OF is defined then it > > > is using at91_pmc_read() which is using at91_pmc_base. And unless > > > COMMON_CLK_AT91 is defined we donot have at91_pmc_base. And > > > COMMON_CLK_AT91 is available with AT91 architecture. > > > Mention the dependency such that this driver builds with avr32 only if > > > OF is not enabled. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> > > > --- > > > > > > Tested build with at91_dt_defconfig and allmodconfig of avr32. Build log > > > at: > > > https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/81168845 > > > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > index 9a3a6b0..cdbff54 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ config USB_LPC32XX > > > > > > config USB_ATMEL_USBA > > > tristate "Atmel USBA" > > > - depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 > > > + depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91) > > > > any chance you can add || COMPILE_TEST here ? I'd like to make > > sure this builds on my end too. > With "depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)" > normal allmodconfig builiding for x86_64 failed with: > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_start’: > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1783:25: error: ‘USBA_ENABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_ENABLE_MASK); > ^ > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_stop’: > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1800:25: error: ‘USBA_DISABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_DISABLE_MASK); > ^ > > Looks like USBA_DISABLE_MASK and USBA_ENABLE_MASK is defined under > #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32). :( Can i check anything else here? Like I said with COMPILE_TEST allmodconfig on x86_64 is failing. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qes77-1uV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1231519 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:22:48PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:40:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:15:28AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:42:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > While building allmodconfig on avr32 the build failed with the error: > > > > "at91_pmc_base" [drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.ko] undefined! > > > > > > > > On checking the code it turned out that if CONFIG_OF is defined then it > > > > is using at91_pmc_read() which is using at91_pmc_base. And unless > > > > COMMON_CLK_AT91 is defined we donot have at91_pmc_base. And > > > > COMMON_CLK_AT91 is available with AT91 architecture. > > > > Mention the dependency such that this driver builds with avr32 only if > > > > OF is not enabled. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Tested build with at91_dt_defconfig and allmodconfig of avr32. Build log > > > > at: > > > > https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/81168845 > > > > > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > index 9a3a6b0..cdbff54 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ config USB_LPC32XX > > > > > > > > config USB_ATMEL_USBA > > > > tristate "Atmel USBA" > > > > - depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 > > > > + depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91) > > > > > > any chance you can add || COMPILE_TEST here ? I'd like to make > > > sure this builds on my end too. > > With "depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)" > > normal allmodconfig builiding for x86_64 failed with: > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_start’: > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1783:25: error: ‘USBA_ENABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_ENABLE_MASK); > > ^ > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_stop’: > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1800:25: error: ‘USBA_DISABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_DISABLE_MASK); > > ^ > > > > Looks like USBA_DISABLE_MASK and USBA_ENABLE_MASK is defined under > > #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32). :( > Can i check anything else here? Like I said with COMPILE_TEST > allmodconfig on x86_64 is failing. then keep it as is, but it would be nice to get that sorted out so I can do compile tests on my end too. -- balbi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qesqv-1Sg-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1236483 |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:04:54AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:22:48PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:40:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:15:28AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:42:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > While building allmodconfig on avr32 the build failed with the error: > > > > > "at91_pmc_base" [drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.ko] undefined! > > > > > > > > > > On checking the code it turned out that if CONFIG_OF is defined then it > > > > > is using at91_pmc_read() which is using at91_pmc_base. And unless > > > > > COMMON_CLK_AT91 is defined we donot have at91_pmc_base. And > > > > > COMMON_CLK_AT91 is available with AT91 architecture. > > > > > Mention the dependency such that this driver builds with avr32 only if > > > > > OF is not enabled. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Tested build with at91_dt_defconfig and allmodconfig of avr32. Build log > > > > > at: > > > > > https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/81168845 > > > > > > > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > > index 9a3a6b0..cdbff54 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ config USB_LPC32XX > > > > > > > > > > config USB_ATMEL_USBA > > > > > tristate "Atmel USBA" > > > > > - depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 > > > > > + depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91) > > > > > > > > any chance you can add || COMPILE_TEST here ? I'd like to make > > > > sure this builds on my end too. > > > With "depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)" > > > normal allmodconfig builiding for x86_64 failed with: > > > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_start’: > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1783:25: error: ‘USBA_ENABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > > usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_ENABLE_MASK); > > > ^ > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_stop’: > > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1800:25: error: ‘USBA_DISABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > > usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_DISABLE_MASK); > > > ^ > > > > > > Looks like USBA_DISABLE_MASK and USBA_ENABLE_MASK is defined under > > > #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32). :( > > Can i check anything else here? Like I said with COMPILE_TEST > > allmodconfig on x86_64 is failing. > > then keep it as is, but it would be nice to get that sorted out > so I can do compile tests on my end too. Maybe Nicolas can give some idea. Adding Nicolas Ferre to CC. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qesAa-23w-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1236518 |
Le 30/09/2015 18:24, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:04:54AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:22:48PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:40:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:15:28AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:42:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>>>> While building allmodconfig on avr32 the build failed with the error: >>>>>> "at91_pmc_base" [drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.ko] undefined! >>>>>> >>>>>> On checking the code it turned out that if CONFIG_OF is defined then it >>>>>> is using at91_pmc_read() which is using at91_pmc_base. And unless >>>>>> COMMON_CLK_AT91 is defined we donot have at91_pmc_base. And >>>>>> COMMON_CLK_AT91 is available with AT91 architecture. >>>>>> Mention the dependency such that this driver builds with avr32 only if >>>>>> OF is not enabled. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> Tested build with at91_dt_defconfig and allmodconfig of avr32. Build log >>>>>> at: >>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/81168845 >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig | 2 +- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig >>>>>> index 9a3a6b0..cdbff54 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig >>>>>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ config USB_LPC32XX >>>>>> >>>>>> config USB_ATMEL_USBA >>>>>> tristate "Atmel USBA" >>>>>> - depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 >>>>>> + depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91) >>>>> >>>>> any chance you can add || COMPILE_TEST here ? I'd like to make >>>>> sure this builds on my end too. >>>> With "depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)" >>>> normal allmodconfig builiding for x86_64 failed with: >>>> >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_start’: >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1783:25: error: ‘USBA_ENABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) >>>> usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_ENABLE_MASK); >>>> ^ >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_stop’: >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1800:25: error: ‘USBA_DISABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) >>>> usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_DISABLE_MASK); >>>> ^ >>>> >>>> Looks like USBA_DISABLE_MASK and USBA_ENABLE_MASK is defined under >>>> #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32). :( >>> Can i check anything else here? Like I said with COMPILE_TEST >>> allmodconfig on x86_64 is failing. >> >> then keep it as is, but it would be nice to get that sorted out >> so I can do compile tests on my end too. > > Maybe Nicolas can give some idea. Adding Nicolas Ferre to CC. Hi, I'm thinking about something like this: 8<---------------------------------------------------------- --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.h +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.h @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32) #define USBA_ENABLE_MASK USBA_EN_USBA #define USBA_DISABLE_MASK 0 -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) +#else #define USBA_ENABLE_MASK (USBA_EN_USBA | USBA_PULLD_DIS) #define USBA_DISABLE_MASK USBA_DETACH -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_AT91 */ +#endif /* Bitfields in FNUM */ #define USBA_MICRO_FRAME_NUM_OFFSET 0 it can be sensible and will all to compile with the COMPILE_TEST directive. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qesTw-2qP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1236522 |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:34:28PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 30/09/2015 18:24, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit : > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:04:54AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:22:48PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:40:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:15:28AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:42:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >>>>>> While building allmodconfig on avr32 the build failed with the error: > >>>>>> "at91_pmc_base" [drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.ko] undefined! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On checking the code it turned out that if CONFIG_OF is defined then it > >>>>>> is using at91_pmc_read() which is using at91_pmc_base. And unless > >>>>>> COMMON_CLK_AT91 is defined we donot have at91_pmc_base. And > >>>>>> COMMON_CLK_AT91 is available with AT91 architecture. > >>>>>> Mention the dependency such that this driver builds with avr32 only if > >>>>>> OF is not enabled. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> > >>>>>> --- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Tested build with at91_dt_defconfig and allmodconfig of avr32. Build log > >>>>>> at: > >>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/81168845 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig | 2 +- > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > >>>>>> index 9a3a6b0..cdbff54 100644 > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > >>>>>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ config USB_LPC32XX > >>>>>> > >>>>>> config USB_ATMEL_USBA > >>>>>> tristate "Atmel USBA" > >>>>>> - depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 > >>>>>> + depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91) > >>>>> > >>>>> any chance you can add || COMPILE_TEST here ? I'd like to make > >>>>> sure this builds on my end too. > >>>> With "depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)" > >>>> normal allmodconfig builiding for x86_64 failed with: > >>>> > >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_start’: > >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1783:25: error: ‘USBA_ENABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > >>>> usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_ENABLE_MASK); > >>>> ^ > >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_stop’: > >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1800:25: error: ‘USBA_DISABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > >>>> usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_DISABLE_MASK); > >>>> ^ > >>>> > >>>> Looks like USBA_DISABLE_MASK and USBA_ENABLE_MASK is defined under > >>>> #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32). :( > >>> Can i check anything else here? Like I said with COMPILE_TEST > >>> allmodconfig on x86_64 is failing. > >> > >> then keep it as is, but it would be nice to get that sorted out > >> so I can do compile tests on my end too. > > > > Maybe Nicolas can give some idea. Adding Nicolas Ferre to CC. > > Hi, > > I'm thinking about something like this: > > 8<---------------------------------------------------------- > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.h > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.h > @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ > #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32) > #define USBA_ENABLE_MASK USBA_EN_USBA > #define USBA_DISABLE_MASK 0 > -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) > +#else > #define USBA_ENABLE_MASK (USBA_EN_USBA | USBA_PULLD_DIS) > #define USBA_DISABLE_MASK USBA_DETACH > -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_AT91 */ > +#endif > > /* Bitfields in FNUM */ > #define USBA_MICRO_FRAME_NUM_OFFSET 0 > > it can be sensible and will all to compile with the COMPILE_TEST directive. Thanks. Will test tomorrow. And my original patch of depending on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91), is that correct? Sorry that I missed ccing you while sending the patch. We should not always depend on getmaintainer.pl. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qetcS-327-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1236545 |
Le 30/09/2015 18:53, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:34:28PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Le 30/09/2015 18:24, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit : >>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:04:54AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:22:48PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:40:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:15:28AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:42:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>>>>>> While building allmodconfig on avr32 the build failed with the error: >>>>>>>> "at91_pmc_base" [drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.ko] undefined! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On checking the code it turned out that if CONFIG_OF is defined then it >>>>>>>> is using at91_pmc_read() which is using at91_pmc_base. And unless >>>>>>>> COMMON_CLK_AT91 is defined we donot have at91_pmc_base. And >>>>>>>> COMMON_CLK_AT91 is available with AT91 architecture. >>>>>>>> Mention the dependency such that this driver builds with avr32 only if >>>>>>>> OF is not enabled. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tested build with at91_dt_defconfig and allmodconfig of avr32. Build log >>>>>>>> at: >>>>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/81168845 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig | 2 +- >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig >>>>>>>> index 9a3a6b0..cdbff54 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig >>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig >>>>>>>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ config USB_LPC32XX >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> config USB_ATMEL_USBA >>>>>>>> tristate "Atmel USBA" >>>>>>>> - depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 >>>>>>>> + depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> any chance you can add || COMPILE_TEST here ? I'd like to make >>>>>>> sure this builds on my end too. >>>>>> With "depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)" >>>>>> normal allmodconfig builiding for x86_64 failed with: >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_start’: >>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1783:25: error: ‘USBA_ENABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) >>>>>> usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_ENABLE_MASK); >>>>>> ^ >>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_stop’: >>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1800:25: error: ‘USBA_DISABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) >>>>>> usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_DISABLE_MASK); >>>>>> ^ >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like USBA_DISABLE_MASK and USBA_ENABLE_MASK is defined under >>>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32). :( >>>>> Can i check anything else here? Like I said with COMPILE_TEST >>>>> allmodconfig on x86_64 is failing. >>>> >>>> then keep it as is, but it would be nice to get that sorted out >>>> so I can do compile tests on my end too. >>> >>> Maybe Nicolas can give some idea. Adding Nicolas Ferre to CC. >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm thinking about something like this: >> >> 8<---------------------------------------------------------- >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.h >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.h >> @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ >> #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32) >> #define USBA_ENABLE_MASK USBA_EN_USBA >> #define USBA_DISABLE_MASK 0 >> -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) >> +#else >> #define USBA_ENABLE_MASK (USBA_EN_USBA | USBA_PULLD_DIS) >> #define USBA_DISABLE_MASK USBA_DETACH >> -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_AT91 */ >> +#endif >> >> /* Bitfields in FNUM */ >> #define USBA_MICRO_FRAME_NUM_OFFSET 0 >> >> it can be sensible and will all to compile with the COMPILE_TEST directive. > > Thanks. Will test tomorrow. And my original patch of depending on > ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91), is that correct? Sounds good to me. > Sorry that I missed ccing you while sending the patch. We should not > always depend on getmaintainer.pl. Well, I'm marked as maintainer for this drivers actually and get_maintainer.pl shouldn't lie this time... Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qeLCO-4xp-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1236552 |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 07:12:18PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > <snip> > > Sorry that I missed ccing you while sending the patch. We should not > > always depend on getmaintainer.pl. > > Well, I'm marked as maintainer for this drivers actually and > get_maintainer.pl shouldn't lie this time... For the driver - yes, but for the Kconfig - no. Thatswhy I missed you in my initial patch. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qeOKm-1gw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1236522 |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:34:28PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 30/09/2015 18:24, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit : > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:04:54AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:22:48PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:40:57PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:15:28AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:42:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >>>>>> While building allmodconfig on avr32 the build failed with the error: > >>>>>> "at91_pmc_base" [drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.ko] undefined! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On checking the code it turned out that if CONFIG_OF is defined then it > >>>>>> is using at91_pmc_read() which is using at91_pmc_base. And unless > >>>>>> COMMON_CLK_AT91 is defined we donot have at91_pmc_base. And > >>>>>> COMMON_CLK_AT91 is available with AT91 architecture. > >>>>>> Mention the dependency such that this driver builds with avr32 only if > >>>>>> OF is not enabled. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> > >>>>>> --- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Tested build with at91_dt_defconfig and allmodconfig of avr32. Build log > >>>>>> at: > >>>>>> https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/81168845 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig | 2 +- > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > >>>>>> index 9a3a6b0..cdbff54 100644 > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > >>>>>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ config USB_LPC32XX > >>>>>> > >>>>>> config USB_ATMEL_USBA > >>>>>> tristate "Atmel USBA" > >>>>>> - depends on AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 > >>>>>> + depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91) > >>>>> > >>>>> any chance you can add || COMPILE_TEST here ? I'd like to make > >>>>> sure this builds on my end too. > >>>> With "depends on ((AVR32 && !OF) || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)" > >>>> normal allmodconfig builiding for x86_64 failed with: > >>>> > >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_start’: > >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1783:25: error: ‘USBA_ENABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > >>>> usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_ENABLE_MASK); > >>>> ^ > >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c: In function ‘usba_stop’: > >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1800:25: error: ‘USBA_DISABLE_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > >>>> usba_writel(udc, CTRL, USBA_DISABLE_MASK); > >>>> ^ > >>>> > >>>> Looks like USBA_DISABLE_MASK and USBA_ENABLE_MASK is defined under > >>>> #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32). :( > >>> Can i check anything else here? Like I said with COMPILE_TEST > >>> allmodconfig on x86_64 is failing. > >> > >> then keep it as is, but it would be nice to get that sorted out > >> so I can do compile tests on my end too. > > > > Maybe Nicolas can give some idea. Adding Nicolas Ferre to CC. > > Hi, > > I'm thinking about something like this: > > 8<---------------------------------------------------------- > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.h > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.h > @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ > #if defined(CONFIG_AVR32) > #define USBA_ENABLE_MASK USBA_EN_USBA > #define USBA_DISABLE_MASK 0 > -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) > +#else > #define USBA_ENABLE_MASK (USBA_EN_USBA | USBA_PULLD_DIS) > #define USBA_DISABLE_MASK USBA_DETACH > -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_AT91 */ > +#endif > > /* Bitfields in FNUM */ > #define USBA_MICRO_FRAME_NUM_OFFSET 0 > > it can be sensible and will all to compile with the COMPILE_TEST directive. OOPS... with this, allmodconfig on x86_64 fails build with: ERROR: "at91_pmc_base" [drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.ko] undefined! Infact, this is the error I reported in my original patch. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web