Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1224589 > unrolled thread

[PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes

Started byRaghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
First post2015-09-15 04:10 +0200
Last post2015-09-22 21:40 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH V2  2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-15 04:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V2  2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for  non existing nodes Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2015-09-22 07:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V2  2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for  non existing nodes Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-22 12:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V2  2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for  non existing nodes Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-22 21:40 +0200

#1224589 — [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes

FromRaghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2015-09-15 04:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes
Message-ID<q8NQZ-7HD-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index 8b9502a..8d8a541 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
 		setup_nr_node_ids();
 
 	/* allocate the map */
-	for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
+	for_each_node(node)
 		alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
 
 	/* cpumask_of_node() will now work */
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1229908 — Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes

FromMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date2015-09-22 07:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes
Message-ID<qbojn-4l9-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1224589
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 07:38 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>
> ... nothing

Sure this patch looks obvious, but please give me a changelog that proves
you've thought about it thoroughly.

For example is it OK to use for_each_node() at this point in boot? Is there any
historical reason why we did it with a hard coded loop? If so what has changed.
What systems have you tested on? etc. etc.

cheers

> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index 8b9502a..8d8a541 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
>  		setup_nr_node_ids();
>  
>  	/* allocate the map */
> -	for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
> +	for_each_node(node)
>  		alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>  
>  	/* cpumask_of_node() will now work */




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1230067 — Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes

FromRaghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2015-09-22 12:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes
Message-ID<qbtj4-2Wc-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1229908
On 09/22/2015 10:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 07:38 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>
>> ... nothing
>
> Sure this patch looks obvious, but please give me a changelog that proves
> you've thought about it thoroughly.
>
> For example is it OK to use for_each_node() at this point in boot? Is there any
> historical reason why we did it with a hard coded loop? If so what has changed.
> What systems have you tested on? etc. etc.
>
> cheers

Changelog:

With the setup_nr_nodes(), we have already initialized
node_possible_map. So it is safe to use for_each_node here.

There are many places in the kernel that use hardcoded 'for' loop with
nr_node_ids, because all other architectures have numa nodes populated
serially. That should be reason we had maintained same for powerpc.

But since on power we have sparse numa node ids possible, we
unnecessarily allocate memory for non existent numa nodes.

For e.g., on a system with 0,1,16,17 as numa nodes nr_node_ids=18
and we allocate memory for nodes 2-14.

The patch is boot tested on a 4 node tuleta [ confirming with printks ].
that it works as expected.

>
>> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> index 8b9502a..8d8a541 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
>>   		setup_nr_node_ids();
>>
>>   	/* allocate the map */
>> -	for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
>> +	for_each_node(node)
>>   		alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>>
>>   	/* cpumask_of_node() will now work */
>
>
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1230863 — Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes

FromRaghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2015-09-22 21:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non existing nodes
Message-ID<qbBzY-6tc-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1229908
* Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [2015-09-22 15:29:03]:

> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 07:38 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> >
> > ... nothing
> 
> Sure this patch looks obvious, but please give me a changelog that proves
> you've thought about it thoroughly.
> 
> For example is it OK to use for_each_node() at this point in boot? Is there any
> historical reason why we did it with a hard coded loop? If so what has changed.
> What systems have you tested on? etc. etc.
> 
> cheers

Hi Michael,
resending the patches with the changelog.

Please note that the patch is in -mm tree already.

---8<---
From 86ead2520662c362d7b9ebd452ce1c33e156016f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 12:54:40 +0530
Subject: [PATCH V2  2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for non
 existing nodes

With the setup_nr_nodes(), we have already initialized
node_possible_map. So it is safe to use for_each_node here.

There are many places in the kernel that use hardcoded 'for' loop with
nr_node_ids, because all other architectures have numa nodes populated
serially. That should be reason we had maintained the same for powerpc.

But, since sparse numa node ids possible on powerpc, we
unnecessarily allocate memory for non existent numa nodes.

For e.g., on a system with 0,1,16,17 as numa nodes nr_node_ids=18
and we allocate memory for nodes 2-14. This patch we allocate
memory for only existing numa nodes.

The patch is boot tested on a 4 node tuleta [ confirming with printks ].
that it works as expected.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index 8b9502a..8d8a541 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
 		setup_nr_node_ids();
 
 	/* allocate the map */
-	for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
+	for_each_node(node)
 		alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
 
 	/* cpumask_of_node() will now work */
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web