Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1231465 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC v7 24/41] richacl: Set the other permissions to the other mask

Started bybfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
First post2015-09-23 16:10 +0200
Last post2015-09-23 16:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC v7 24/41] richacl: Set the other permissions to the other  mask bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) - 2015-09-23 16:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC v7 24/41] richacl: Set the other permissions to the other mask Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 16:20 +0200

#1231465 — Re: [RFC v7 24/41] richacl: Set the other permissions to the other mask

Frombfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
Date2015-09-23 16:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC v7 24/41] richacl: Set the other permissions to the other mask
Message-ID<qbSUb-6pd-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:19PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Change the acl so that everyone@ is granted the permissions set in the
> other mask.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/richacl_compat.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c
> index 14a1b4b..30bdc95 100644
> --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c
> +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c
> @@ -459,3 +459,38 @@ richacl_set_owner_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * richacl_set_other_permissions  -  set the other permissions to the other mask
> + *
> + * Change the acl so that everyone@ is granted the permissions set in the other
> + * mask.  This leaves at most one efective everyone@ allow entry at the end of
> + * the acl.
> + */
> +static int
> +richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
> +{
> +	struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl;
> +	unsigned int x = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED;
> +	unsigned int other_mask = acl->a_other_mask & ~x;
> +	struct richace *ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1;
> +
> +	if (!(other_mask &&
> +	      (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) &&
> +	      (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED)))
> +		return 0;

By the way, I think this is only called after checking MASKED--so the
MASKED check here could be a WARN_ON, or could just be dropped.  Ditto
for the following patch.

--b.

> +
> +	if (acl->a_count == 0 ||
> +	    !richace_is_everyone(ace) ||
> +	    richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) {
> +		ace++;
> +		if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace))
> +			return -1;
> +		ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE;
> +		ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO;
> +		ace->e_mask = other_mask;
> +		ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_EVERYONE_SPECIAL_ID;
> +	} else
> +		richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, other_mask);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> -- 
> 2.4.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1231468 — Re: [RFC v7 24/41] richacl: Set the other permissions to the other mask

FromAndreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-23 16:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC v7 24/41] richacl: Set the other permissions to the other mask
Message-ID<qbT3Q-6As-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1231465
2015-09-23 16:03 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:19PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> +static int
>> +richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
>> +{
>> +     struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl;
>> +     unsigned int x = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED;
>> +     unsigned int other_mask = acl->a_other_mask & ~x;
>> +     struct richace *ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1;
>> +
>> +     if (!(other_mask &&
>> +           (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) &&
>> +           (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED)))
>> +             return 0;
>
> By the way, I think this is only called after checking MASKED--so the
> MASKED check here could be a WARN_ON, or could just be dropped.  Ditto
> for the following patch.

Hmm, yes. I'll drop that.

Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web