Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1231200 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC 0/5] console/acpi: add DBG2 and SPCR console configuration

Started byMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
First post2015-09-23 09:40 +0200
Last post2015-09-23 17:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC 0/5] console/acpi: add DBG2 and SPCR console configuration Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2015-09-23 09:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC 0/5] console/acpi: add DBG2 and SPCR console configuration G Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org> - 2015-09-23 17:50 +0200

#1231200 — Re: [RFC 0/5] console/acpi: add DBG2 and SPCR console configuration

FromMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Date2015-09-23 09:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/5] console/acpi: add DBG2 and SPCR console configuration
Message-ID<qbMOK-5WP-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Leif,


On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
> Support for configuring bootconsole and console via the ACPI tables
> DBG2 (Debug Port Table 2) [1] and SPCR (Serial Port Console Redirection
> Table) [2], defined by Microsoft, has been discussed on and off over the
> years.
>
> [1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn639131(v=vs.85).aspx
> [2] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn639132(v=vs.85).aspx
>
> Licensing concerns have prevented this happening in the past, but as of
> 10 August 2015, these tables have both been released also under OWF 1.0
> (http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0)
> which is think is noncontroversially GPL-compatible?
>
> This set is a first attempt at implementing this.

From distribution view, the patchset looks very useful.

I have one simple question, are there other candidates for conveying this kind
of information like what DBG2/SPCR does? Or are DBG2 and SPCR the
offical speficiations to do such things in ARM server industry?

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1231514

FromG Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Date2015-09-23 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<qbUsW-8tN-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1231200
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:38:20PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Leif,
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Support for configuring bootconsole and console via the ACPI tables
> > DBG2 (Debug Port Table 2) [1] and SPCR (Serial Port Console Redirection
> > Table) [2], defined by Microsoft, has been discussed on and off over the
> > years.
> >
> > [1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn639131(v=vs.85).aspx
> > [2] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn639132(v=vs.85).aspx
> >
> > Licensing concerns have prevented this happening in the past, but as of
> > 10 August 2015, these tables have both been released also under OWF 1.0
> > (http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0)
> > which is think is noncontroversially GPL-compatible?
> >
> > This set is a first attempt at implementing this.
> 
> From distribution view, the patchset looks very useful.
> 
> I have one simple question, are there other candidates for conveying this kind
> of information like what DBG2/SPCR does? Or are DBG2 and SPCR the
> offical speficiations to do such things in ARM server industry?
> 

They are mandated in the SBBR spec

Graeme


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web