Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1228984 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-21 03:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-21 05:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> - 2015-09-21 03:20 +0200
Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> - 2015-09-21 05:50 +0200
| From | David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 03:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps |
| Message-ID | <qaXVT-8u0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 9/20/15 6:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b ("net: Add support for VRFs to inetpeer cache")
>
>
> =========================================================================================
> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/runtime/nr_threads/cluster/test:
> lkp-sbx04/netperf/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/300s/200%/cs-localhost/TCP_CRR
>
> commit:
> 5345c2e12d41f815c1009c9dee72f3d5fcfd4282
> 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b
>
Clarification: The reproduce file shows 128 instances of 'netperf -t
TCP_CRR -c -C -l 300 -H 127.0.0.1' without an '&' on the end. Does that
mean these 128 commands are run serially?
Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then
adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to
192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it
possible to get this test run on your system comparing those 2 commits?
Thanks,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 05:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qb0h3-3hw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1228984 |
On 9/20/15 7:33 PM, Huang Ying wrote: >> Clarification: The reproduce file shows 128 instances of 'netperf -t >> TCP_CRR -c -C -l 300 -H 127.0.0.1' without an '&' on the end. Does >> that >> mean these 128 commands are run serially? > > Sorry. It's a script bug, there should be a "&" on the end. Will fix > the script. Ok. > >> >> Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then >> adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to >> 192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it >> possible to get this test run on your system comparing those 2 >> commits? > > Sure. It is attached with the mail. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web