Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1328629 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-07 23:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-08 18:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2] staging: unisys: use common return path Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-02-07 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] staging: unisys: use common return path Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 18:20 +0100
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 23:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] staging: unisys: use common return path |
| Message-ID | <qZFGO-4aL-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > The success path and the error path both are first doing > spin_unlock_irqrestore() before returning. Use that in the common path > and return the success/error value. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> > --- > > v2: changed label name > > It is dependent on the patch series sent by Benjamin (Nov 30th). Which didn't get applied, so can you resend this after that does get accepted? thanks, greg k-h
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qZXDI-8ih-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1328629 |
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 02:04:21PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > The success path and the error path both are first doing > > spin_unlock_irqrestore() before returning. Use that in the common path > > and return the success/error value. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> > > --- > > > > v2: changed label name > > > > It is dependent on the patch series sent by Benjamin (Nov 30th). > > Which didn't get applied, so can you resend this after that does get > accepted? oops, i dont think i have the patch anymore. But looking at the commit message, i think i just sent the same suggestion to Benjamin for his [PATCH v3 13/14] staging: unisys: fix else statement in visornic_main.c If he is not changing then I will create the patch and send you. regards sudip
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web