Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1328797 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-08 08:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-08 11:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 2/2] Staging: iio: adc: Prefer using the BIT macro Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 08:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: iio: adc: Prefer using the BIT macro Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2016-02-08 11:20 +0100
| From | Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 08:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/2] Staging: iio: adc: Prefer using the BIT macro |
| Message-ID | <qZNXI-1zU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
This patch replaces bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro.
This was done with coccinelle:
@@ int g; @@
-(1 << g)
+BIT(g)
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
index 0c73bce..ccf3157 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
*/
#define POLYNOM 0x2F
#define POLYNOM_ORDER 8
-#define HIGHBIT (1 << (POLYNOM_ORDER - 1))
+#define HIGHBIT BIT((POLYNOM_ORDER - 1))
struct ad7280_state {
struct spi_device *spi;
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static ssize_t ad7280_show_balance_sw(struct device *dev,
return sprintf(buf, "%d\n",
!!(st->cb_mask[this_attr->address >> 8] &
- (1 << ((this_attr->address & 0xFF) + 2))));
+ BIT(((this_attr->address & 0xFF) + 2))));
}
static ssize_t ad7280_store_balance_sw(struct device *dev,
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qZR5f-3R9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1328797 |
On 02/08/2016 07:48 AM, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> This patch replaces bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro.
>
> This was done with coccinelle:
>
> @@ int g; @@
>
> -(1 << g)
> +BIT(g)
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
Hi,
Thanks for the patch. This looks good.
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> index 0c73bce..ccf3157 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
> */
> #define POLYNOM 0x2F
> #define POLYNOM_ORDER 8
> -#define HIGHBIT (1 << (POLYNOM_ORDER - 1))
> +#define HIGHBIT BIT((POLYNOM_ORDER - 1))
But please drop the extra brackets and resend the patch.
>
> struct ad7280_state {
> struct spi_device *spi;
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static ssize_t ad7280_show_balance_sw(struct device *dev,
>
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n",
> !!(st->cb_mask[this_attr->address >> 8] &
> - (1 << ((this_attr->address & 0xFF) + 2))));
> + BIT(((this_attr->address & 0xFF) + 2))));
Same here.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web