Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1328531 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 2/5] mm: vmscan: pass root_mem_cgroup instead of NULL to memcg aware shrinker

Started byVladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
First post2016-02-07 18:30 +0100
Last post2016-02-08 06:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 2/5] mm: vmscan: pass root_mem_cgroup instead of NULL to memcg aware shrinker Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-07 18:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: vmscan: pass root_mem_cgroup instead of NULL to  memcg aware shrinker Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-02-08 06:50 +0100

#1328531 — [PATCH 2/5] mm: vmscan: pass root_mem_cgroup instead of NULL to memcg aware shrinker

FromVladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Date2016-02-07 18:30 +0100
Subject[PATCH 2/5] mm: vmscan: pass root_mem_cgroup instead of NULL to memcg aware shrinker
Message-ID<qZBjQ-Sz-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
It's just convenient to implement a memcg aware shrinker when you know
that shrink_control->memcg != NULL unless memcg_kmem_enabled() returns
false.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 18b3767136f4..bae8f32ad9cb 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -382,9 +382,8 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
  *
  * @memcg specifies the memory cgroup to target. If it is not NULL,
  * only shrinkers with SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE set will be called to scan
- * objects from the memory cgroup specified. Otherwise all shrinkers
- * are called, and memcg aware shrinkers are supposed to scan the
- * global list then.
+ * objects from the memory cgroup specified. Otherwise, only unaware
+ * shrinkers are called.
  *
  * @nr_scanned and @nr_eligible form a ratio that indicate how much of
  * the available objects should be scanned.  Page reclaim for example
@@ -404,7 +403,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 	unsigned long freed = 0;
 
-	if (memcg && !memcg_kmem_online(memcg))
+	if (memcg && (!memcg_kmem_enabled() || !mem_cgroup_online(memcg)))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (nr_scanned == 0)
@@ -428,7 +427,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 			.memcg = memcg,
 		};
 
-		if (memcg && !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
+		/*
+		 * If kernel memory accounting is disabled, we ignore
+		 * SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE flag and call all shrinkers
+		 * passing NULL for memcg.
+		 */
+		if (memcg_kmem_enabled() &&
+		    !!memcg != !!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
 			continue;
 
 		if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1328779 — Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: vmscan: pass root_mem_cgroup instead of NULL to memcg aware shrinker

FromJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date2016-02-08 06:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] mm: vmscan: pass root_mem_cgroup instead of NULL to memcg aware shrinker
Message-ID<qZMRY-IU-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1328531
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:27:32PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> It's just convenient to implement a memcg aware shrinker when you know
> that shrink_control->memcg != NULL unless memcg_kmem_enabled() returns
> false.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web