Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1326701 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-04 12:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-05 06:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[patch] extcon: use correct size Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-02-04 12:40 +0100
Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size walter harms <wharms@bfs.de> - 2016-02-04 14:00 +0100
Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-02-04 21:00 +0100
RE: [patch] extcon: use correct size 김재원 <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com> - 2016-02-05 03:20 +0100
Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-02-05 03:00 +0100
Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> - 2016-02-05 06:20 +0100
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-04 12:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [patch] extcon: use correct size |
| Message-ID | <qYqqv-81W-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
intended.
Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
- MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
+ MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
goto err_muic_irq;
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | walter harms <wharms@bfs.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-04 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYrFU-jS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1326701 |
Am 04.02.2016 12:36, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> intended.
>
> Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> goto err_muic_irq;
> --
just for my curiosity: what is wrong with ARRAY_SIZE() ?
So far i understand is the functions intention to fill the array
completely.
re,
wh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-04 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYyem-6s7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1326762 |
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:47:41PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.02.2016 12:36, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> > MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> > intended.
> >
> > Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> > ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> > MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> > - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> > + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> > goto err_muic_irq;
> > --
>
>
> just for my curiosity: what is wrong with ARRAY_SIZE() ?
> So far i understand is the functions intention to fill the array
> completely.
It's done pretty consistently the one way... Jaewon?
regards,
dan carpenter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 김재원 <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 03:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYEa6-28j-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1327146 |
Hi, Dan
02/05/2016 04:53 AM에 Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:47:41PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 04.02.2016 12:36, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > > The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> > > MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3)
> > > as intended.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state
> > > before request IRQ')
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review
carefully.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > > b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > > index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > > @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
> > > /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> > > ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> > > MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> > > - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> > > + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> > > goto err_muic_irq;
> > > --
> >
> >
> > just for my curiosity: what is wrong with ARRAY_SIZE() ?
> > So far i understand is the functions intention to fill the array
> > completely.
>
> It's done pretty consistently the one way... Jaewon?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
You are right.
We should read only 3-sequential register.
(MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT2, MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT3)
Reviewed-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
Thanks
Jaewon Kim
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 03:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYDQJ-1M6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1326701 |
2016-02-04 20:36 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>:
> The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> intended.
>
> Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> goto err_muic_irq;
Looks correct. Issue came from our internal tree where
MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM is redefined to a value of 3.
However the subject should be fixed to match the subsystem and more
accurately describe the error.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 06:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYGYi-4eC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1326701 |
Hi Dan,
On 2016년 02월 04일 20:36, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> intended.
>
> Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> goto err_muic_irq;
>
>
The patch title should include the correct information
of specific device.
extcon: use correct size
-> extcon: max77843: Use correct size for reading the interrupt register
Applied it.
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web