Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1322614 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-31 13:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-05 01:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-01-31 13:10 +0100
Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-01-31 13:20 +0100
Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-02-05 00:00 +0100
Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-02-05 01:20 +0100
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 13:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support |
| Message-ID | <qWYZk-35l-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, On 27/01/2016 at 00:36:36 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > Hello, > > On a recent disussion [0] with Krzysztof Kozlowski and Laxman Dewangan, > we came to the conclusion that the max77686 and max77802 RTC are almost > the same with only a few differences so there shouldn't be two separate > drivers and is better to extend max77686 driver and delete rtc-max77802. > > By making the driver more generic, other RTC IP blocks from Maxim PMICs > could be supported as well like the max77620. > > This is a v4 of a series that do this, that address issues pointed out > in the latest version. The v1, v2 and v3 can be found at [1], [2], [3]. > > I've tested this patch-set on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook that has > a max77802 PMIC and the RTC was working correctly. Krzysztof Kozlowski > tested v3 on an max77686 but this version only has cosmetic changes so > it should not cause any functionality changes. > > [0]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg110348.html > [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/672568/ > [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/25/767 > [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/26/787 > I've applied patches 1 to 8 and I'll discussed with Arnd and Olof about what I should do with the defconfig changes. Thanks! -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 13:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support |
| Message-ID | <qWZ90-38Q-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1322614 |
W dniu 31.01.2016 o 21:05, Alexandre Belloni pisze: > Hi, > > On 27/01/2016 at 00:36:36 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : >> Hello, >> >> On a recent disussion [0] with Krzysztof Kozlowski and Laxman Dewangan, >> we came to the conclusion that the max77686 and max77802 RTC are almost >> the same with only a few differences so there shouldn't be two separate >> drivers and is better to extend max77686 driver and delete rtc-max77802. >> >> By making the driver more generic, other RTC IP blocks from Maxim PMICs >> could be supported as well like the max77620. >> >> This is a v4 of a series that do this, that address issues pointed out >> in the latest version. The v1, v2 and v3 can be found at [1], [2], [3]. >> >> I've tested this patch-set on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook that has >> a max77802 PMIC and the RTC was working correctly. Krzysztof Kozlowski >> tested v3 on an max77686 but this version only has cosmetic changes so >> it should not cause any functionality changes. >> >> [0]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg110348.html >> [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/672568/ >> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/25/767 >> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/26/787 >> > > I've applied patches 1 to 8 and I'll discussed with Arnd and Olof about > what I should do with the defconfig changes. To avoid conflicts they could go through samsung-soc tree. I could pick them if you provide me a tag with rest of patchset (dependencies). Would that be okay for you? Best regards, Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 00:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support |
| Message-ID | <qYB2A-8qn-63@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1322622 |
On 31/01/2016 at 21:11:00 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote : > W dniu 31.01.2016 o 21:05, Alexandre Belloni pisze: > > Hi, > > > > On 27/01/2016 at 00:36:36 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > >> Hello, > >> > >> On a recent disussion [0] with Krzysztof Kozlowski and Laxman Dewangan, > >> we came to the conclusion that the max77686 and max77802 RTC are almost > >> the same with only a few differences so there shouldn't be two separate > >> drivers and is better to extend max77686 driver and delete rtc-max77802. > >> > >> By making the driver more generic, other RTC IP blocks from Maxim PMICs > >> could be supported as well like the max77620. > >> > >> This is a v4 of a series that do this, that address issues pointed out > >> in the latest version. The v1, v2 and v3 can be found at [1], [2], [3]. > >> > >> I've tested this patch-set on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook that has > >> a max77802 PMIC and the RTC was working correctly. Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> tested v3 on an max77686 but this version only has cosmetic changes so > >> it should not cause any functionality changes. > >> > >> [0]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg110348.html > >> [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/672568/ > >> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/25/767 > >> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/26/787 > >> > > > > I've applied patches 1 to 8 and I'll discussed with Arnd and Olof about > > what I should do with the defconfig changes. > > To avoid conflicts they could go through samsung-soc tree. I could pick > them if you provide me a tag with rest of patchset (dependencies). > > Would that be okay for you? > Let's do that, I've prepared a tag, rtc-max77686-4.6 with all the max77686 material collected until now. If I need to rebase rtc-next, I'll rebase on top of that. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 01:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support |
| Message-ID | <qYChY-XM-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1327289 |
On 05.02.2016 07:56, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 31/01/2016 at 21:11:00 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote : >> W dniu 31.01.2016 o 21:05, Alexandre Belloni pisze: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 27/01/2016 at 00:36:36 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> On a recent disussion [0] with Krzysztof Kozlowski and Laxman Dewangan, >>>> we came to the conclusion that the max77686 and max77802 RTC are almost >>>> the same with only a few differences so there shouldn't be two separate >>>> drivers and is better to extend max77686 driver and delete rtc-max77802. >>>> >>>> By making the driver more generic, other RTC IP blocks from Maxim PMICs >>>> could be supported as well like the max77620. >>>> >>>> This is a v4 of a series that do this, that address issues pointed out >>>> in the latest version. The v1, v2 and v3 can be found at [1], [2], [3]. >>>> >>>> I've tested this patch-set on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook that has >>>> a max77802 PMIC and the RTC was working correctly. Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>> tested v3 on an max77686 but this version only has cosmetic changes so >>>> it should not cause any functionality changes. >>>> >>>> [0]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg110348.html >>>> [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/672568/ >>>> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/25/767 >>>> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/26/787 >>>> >>> >>> I've applied patches 1 to 8 and I'll discussed with Arnd and Olof about >>> what I should do with the defconfig changes. >> >> To avoid conflicts they could go through samsung-soc tree. I could pick >> them if you provide me a tag with rest of patchset (dependencies). >> >> Would that be okay for you? >> > > Let's do that, I've prepared a tag, rtc-max77686-4.6 with all the > max77686 material collected until now. If I need to rebase rtc-next, > I'll rebase on top of that. Thanks, I pulled the tag, applied patches #9 and #10 and pushed out to the for-next. Best regards, Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web