Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1323219 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] mailbox: pcc: fix channel calculation in get_pcc_channel()

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] mailbox: pcc: fix channel calculation in get_pcc_channel() Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> - 2016-02-01 16:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mailbox: pcc: fix channel calculation in get_pcc_channel() Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 16:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mailbox: pcc: fix channel calculation in get_pcc_channel() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-02-01 22:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] mailbox: pcc: fix channel calculation in get_pcc_channel() Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 12:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] mailbox: pcc: fix channel calculation in get_pcc_channel() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-02-03 02:30 +0100

#1323219 — Re: [PATCH] mailbox: pcc: fix channel calculation in get_pcc_channel()

(adding Rafael and linux-acpi)

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
> + Jassi (Linaro addr)
>
> On 15 January 2016 at 13:20, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Jassi,
>>
>> On 10 December 2015 at 13:19, Ashwin Chaugule
>> <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 10 December 2015 at 12:28, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> This patch fixes the calculation of pcc_chan for non-zero id.
>>>> After the compiler ignores the (unsigned long) cast the
>>>> pcc_mbox_channels pointer is type-cast and then the type-cast
>>>> offset is added which results in address outside of the range
>>>> leading to the kernel crashing.
>>>>
>>>> We might add braces and make it:
>>>>
>>>> pcc_chan = (struct mbox_chan *)
>>>>                 ((unsigned long) pcc_mbox_channels +
>>>>                 (id * sizeof(*pcc_chan)));
>>>>
>>>> but let's go with array approach here and use id as index.
>>>>
>>>> Tested on Juno board.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 8 +-------
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>>>> index 45d85ae..8f779a1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>>>> @@ -81,16 +81,10 @@ static struct mbox_controller pcc_mbox_ctrl = {};
>>>>   */
>>>>  static struct mbox_chan *get_pcc_channel(int id)
>>>>  {
>>>> -       struct mbox_chan *pcc_chan;
>>>> -
>>>>         if (id < 0 || id > pcc_mbox_ctrl.num_chans)
>>>>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>>>>
>>>> -       pcc_chan = (struct mbox_chan *)
>>>> -               (unsigned long) pcc_mbox_channels +
>>>> -               (id * sizeof(*pcc_chan));
>>>> -
>>>> -       return pcc_chan;
>>>> +       return &pcc_mbox_channels[id];
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Strange that we didn't catch this even with a non-zero id. But the
>>> change makes sense so..
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
>>
>> Can you please include this patch in your pull request to Linus?

Hi Rafael,

any chance you can take this fix via your tree?
I can resend patch if you want.
Looks like Jassi doesn't have time or doesn't care.

Best regards,
Alexey

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1323266

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> wrote:
> (adding Rafael and linux-acpi)
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
>> + Jassi (Linaro addr)
>>
>> On 15 January 2016 at 13:20, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Jassi,
>>>
>>> On 10 December 2015 at 13:19, Ashwin Chaugule
>>> <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On 10 December 2015 at 12:28, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>> This patch fixes the calculation of pcc_chan for non-zero id.
>>>>> After the compiler ignores the (unsigned long) cast the
>>>>> pcc_mbox_channels pointer is type-cast and then the type-cast
>>>>> offset is added which results in address outside of the range
>>>>> leading to the kernel crashing.
>>>>>
>>>>> We might add braces and make it:
>>>>>
>>>>> pcc_chan = (struct mbox_chan *)
>>>>>                 ((unsigned long) pcc_mbox_channels +
>>>>>                 (id * sizeof(*pcc_chan)));
>>>>>
>>>>> but let's go with array approach here and use id as index.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on Juno board.
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 8 +-------
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>>>>> index 45d85ae..8f779a1 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>>>>> @@ -81,16 +81,10 @@ static struct mbox_controller pcc_mbox_ctrl = {};
>>>>>   */
>>>>>  static struct mbox_chan *get_pcc_channel(int id)
>>>>>  {
>>>>> -       struct mbox_chan *pcc_chan;
>>>>> -
>>>>>         if (id < 0 || id > pcc_mbox_ctrl.num_chans)
>>>>>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>>>>>
>>>>> -       pcc_chan = (struct mbox_chan *)
>>>>> -               (unsigned long) pcc_mbox_channels +
>>>>> -               (id * sizeof(*pcc_chan));
>>>>> -
>>>>> -       return pcc_chan;
>>>>> +       return &pcc_mbox_channels[id];
>>>>>  }
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Strange that we didn't catch this even with a non-zero id. But the
>>>> change makes sense so..
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Can you please include this patch in your pull request to Linus?
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> any chance you can take this fix via your tree?
> I can resend patch if you want.
> Looks like Jassi doesn't have time or doesn't care.
>
Ouch... sorry. Ashwin's reminder came after I had sent the pull
request. And then it just got overlooked. If Rafael doesn't pick it as
my punishment, I'll tomorow :)

Cheers!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1323504

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> wrote:
>> (adding Rafael and linux-acpi)
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> + Jassi (Linaro addr)
>>>
>>> On 15 January 2016 at 13:20, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:

[cut]

>>>> Can you please include this patch in your pull request to Linus?
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> any chance you can take this fix via your tree?
>> I can resend patch if you want.
>> Looks like Jassi doesn't have time or doesn't care.
>>
> Ouch... sorry. Ashwin's reminder came after I had sent the pull
> request. And then it just got overlooked. If Rafael doesn't pick it as
> my punishment, I'll tomorow :)

I can apply it, but can anyone please point me to the original patch?

Or, maybe better, resend it with a CC to linux-acpi and all of the
tags collected so far?

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1323987

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> wrote:
>>> (adding Rafael and linux-acpi)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> + Jassi (Linaro addr)
>>>>
>>>> On 15 January 2016 at 13:20, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>>>> Can you please include this patch in your pull request to Linus?
>>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>> any chance you can take this fix via your tree?
>>> I can resend patch if you want.
>>> Looks like Jassi doesn't have time or doesn't care.
>>>
>> Ouch... sorry. Ashwin's reminder came after I had sent the pull
>> request. And then it just got overlooked. If Rafael doesn't pick it as
>> my punishment, I'll tomorow :)
>
> I can apply it, but can anyone please point me to the original patch?
>
> Or, maybe better, resend it with a CC to linux-acpi and all of the
> tags collected so far?
>
or even simpler ... I queued it already
https://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration.git/log/refs/heads/mailbox-devel
 ?

Thanks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1324801

On Tuesday, February 02, 2016 04:42:52 PM Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> wrote:
> >>> (adding Rafael and linux-acpi)
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>> + Jassi (Linaro addr)
> >>>>
> >>>> On 15 January 2016 at 13:20, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > [cut]
> >
> >>>>> Can you please include this patch in your pull request to Linus?
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rafael,
> >>>
> >>> any chance you can take this fix via your tree?
> >>> I can resend patch if you want.
> >>> Looks like Jassi doesn't have time or doesn't care.
> >>>
> >> Ouch... sorry. Ashwin's reminder came after I had sent the pull
> >> request. And then it just got overlooked. If Rafael doesn't pick it as
> >> my punishment, I'll tomorow :)
> >
> > I can apply it, but can anyone please point me to the original patch?
> >
> > Or, maybe better, resend it with a CC to linux-acpi and all of the
> > tags collected so far?
> >
> or even simpler ... I queued it already
> https://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration.git/log/refs/heads/mailbox-devel
>  ?

That works for me too. :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web