Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324890 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-03 04:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-03 04:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 0/4] let printk()/console_trylock() callers to cond_resched() Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:50 +0100
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 04:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 0/4] let printk()/console_trylock() callers to cond_resched() |
| Message-ID | <qXWC5-4X7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello, On (01/23/16 17:15), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > [was: cond_resched() some of console_trylock callers] > > Hello, > > console_unlock() allows to cond_resched() if its caller has > set `console_may_schedule' to 1 (this functionality present > since commit 'printk: do cond_resched() between lines while > outputting to consoles'). gentlemen, did you get a chance to look into this? -ss > The rules are: > -- console_lock() always sets `console_may_schedule' to 1 > -- console_trylock() always sets `console_may_schedule' to 0 > > printk() calls console_unlock() with preemption desabled, which > basically can lead to RCU stalls, watchdog soft lockups, etc. if > something is simultaneously calling printk() frequent enough (IOW, > console_sem owner always has new data to send to console divers > and can't leave console_unlock() for a long time). > > printk()->console_trylock() callers do not necessarily execute in > atomic contexts, and some of them can cond_resched() in > console_unlock(). console_trylock() can set `console_may_schedule' > to 1 (allow cond_resched() later in consoe_unlock()) when it's safe. > > 0001 addresses a theoretical loss of printk messages. > 0002 is an optional optimization patch > 0003 drops console_trylock_for_printk > 0004 lets some of printk()/console_trylock() callers to cond_resched() > in console_unlock() > > v2-v3 (thanks to Petr Mladek for reviews): > -- do not call can_use_console() on every iteration in console_unlock() (Petr Mladek) > -- move "This stops the holder of console_sem.." comment (noted by Petr Mladek) > -- take extra care of !PREEMPT_COUNT kernels (Petr Mladek) > -- call_console_drivers() still must check cpu_online && CON_ANYTIME (Petr Mladek) > -- removed console_trylock_for_printk() (noted by Petr Mladek) > > v1-v2: > -- make have_callable_console() available for !PRINTK configs (lkp@intel.com) > -- take care of RCU preempt kernels in console_trylock() > > > Sergey Senozhatsky (4): > printk: move can_use_console out of console_trylock_for_printk > printk: do not console_cont_flush() on every jump to again > printk: remove console_trylock_for_printk > printk: set may_schedule for some of console_trylock callers > > kernel/printk/printk.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.0 >
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web