Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324565 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-02 20:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-02 20:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v8 2/6] cpufreq: powernv: Hot-plug safe the kworker thread Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 20:50 +0100
| From | Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 20:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v8 2/6] cpufreq: powernv: Hot-plug safe the kworker thread |
| Message-ID | <qXP7A-7Ux-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
In the kworker_thread powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(), we can end up
sending an IPI to a cpu going offline. This is a rare corner case
which is fixed using {get/put}_online_cpus(). Along with this fix,
this patch adds changes to do oneshot cpumask_{clear/and} operation.
Suggested-by: Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
No changes from v7.
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index 53f980b..a271b0f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <asm/cputhreads.h>
#include <asm/firmware.h>
@@ -423,18 +424,19 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
unsigned int cpu;
- cpumask_var_t mask;
+ cpumask_t mask;
- smp_call_function_any(&chip->mask,
+ get_online_cpus();
+ cpumask_and(&mask, &chip->mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ smp_call_function_any(&mask,
powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check, NULL, 0);
if (!chip->restore)
- return;
+ goto out;
chip->restore = false;
- cpumask_copy(mask, &chip->mask);
- for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask) {
- int index, tcpu;
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
+ int index;
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
@@ -442,9 +444,10 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
policy.cur,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_C, &index);
powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
- for_each_cpu(tcpu, policy.cpus)
- cpumask_clear_cpu(tcpu, mask);
+ cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
}
+out:
+ put_online_cpus();
}
static char throttle_reason[][30] = {
--
1.9.3
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web