Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1322431 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 4/8] perf, tools, stat: Implement CSV metrics output

Started byAndi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
First post2016-01-30 18:10 +0100
Last post2016-02-02 15:10 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 4/8] perf, tools, stat: Implement CSV metrics output Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-01-30 18:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/8] perf, tools, stat: Implement CSV metrics output Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-02-02 11:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4/8] perf, tools, stat: Implement CSV metrics output Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-02 15:10 +0100

#1322431 — [PATCH 4/8] perf, tools, stat: Implement CSV metrics output

FromAndi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date2016-01-30 18:10 +0100
Subject[PATCH 4/8] perf, tools, stat: Implement CSV metrics output
Message-ID<qWHc7-70c-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now support CSV output for metrics. With the new output callbacks
this is relatively straight forward by creating new callbacks.

The new line callback needs to know the number of fields to skip them
correctly

Example output before:

% perf stat -x, true
0.200687,,task-clock,200687,100.00
0,,context-switches,200687,100.00
0,,cpu-migrations,200687,100.00
40,,page-faults,200687,100.00
730871,,cycles,203601,100.00
551056,,stalled-cycles-frontend,203601,100.00
<not supported>,,stalled-cycles-backend,0,100.00
385523,,instructions,203601,100.00
78028,,branches,203601,100.00
3946,,branch-misses,203601,100.00

After:

% perf stat -x, true
0.341119,,task-clock,0.461,CPUs utilized,0.00%,324342,100.00
0,,context-switches,0.000,K/sec,0.00%,324342,100.00
0,,cpu-migrations,0.000,K/sec,0.00%,324342,100.00
41,,page-faults,0.126,M/sec,0.00%,324342,100.00
674068,,cycles,2.078,GHz,0.00%,330887,100.00
508189,,stalled-cycles-frontend,82.31,frontend cycles idle,0.00%,330887,100.00
<not supported>,,stalled-cycles-backend,,,0.00%,0,100.00
374932,,instructions,0.61,insn per cycle
,,,1.20,stalled cycles per insn,0.00%,330887,100.00
76540,,branches,235.985,M/sec,0.00%,330887,100.00
3091,,branch-misses,4.09,of all branches,0.00%,330887,100.00

Two new fields are added: metric value and metric name before
the running/enabled fields.

v2: Split out function argument changes
v3: Reenable metrics for real.
v4: Fix wrong hunk from refactoring.
v5: Remove extra "noise" printing (Jiri), but add it to the not counted case.
Print empty metrics for not counted.
v6: Avoid outputting metric on empty format.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
index bfb6e07..86caf70 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
@@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ struct outstate {
 	FILE *fh;
 	bool newline;
 	const char *prefix;
+	int  nfields;
+	u64  run, ena;
 };
 
 #define METRIC_LEN  35
@@ -789,6 +791,43 @@ static void print_metric_std(void *ctx, const char *color, const char *fmt,
 	fprintf(out, " %-*s", METRIC_LEN - n - 1, unit);
 }
 
+static void new_line_csv(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct outstate *os = ctx;
+	int i;
+
+	fputc('\n', os->fh);
+	if (os->prefix)
+		fprintf(os->fh, "%s%s", os->prefix, csv_sep);
+	for (i = 0; i < os->nfields; i++)
+		fputs(csv_sep, os->fh);
+}
+
+static void print_metric_csv(void *ctx,
+			     const char *color __maybe_unused,
+			     const char *fmt, const char *unit, double val)
+{
+	struct outstate *os = ctx;
+	FILE *out = os->fh;
+	char buf[64], *vals, *ends;
+
+	if (unit == NULL || fmt == NULL) {
+		fprintf(out, "%s%s%s%s", csv_sep, csv_sep, csv_sep, csv_sep);
+		return;
+	}
+	snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, val);
+	vals = buf;
+	while (isspace(*vals))
+		vals++;
+	ends = vals;
+	while (isdigit(*ends) || *ends == '.')
+		ends++;
+	*ends = 0;
+	while (isspace(*unit))
+		unit++;
+	fprintf(out, "%s%s%s%s", csv_sep, vals, csv_sep, unit);
+}
+
 static void nsec_printout(int id, int nr, struct perf_evsel *evsel, double avg)
 {
 	FILE *output = stat_config.output;
@@ -860,6 +899,24 @@ static void printout(int id, int nr, struct perf_evsel *counter, double uval,
 
 	nl = new_line_std;
 
+	if (csv_output) {
+		static int aggr_fields[] = {
+			[AGGR_GLOBAL] = 0,
+			[AGGR_THREAD] = 1,
+			[AGGR_NONE] = 1,
+			[AGGR_SOCKET] = 2,
+			[AGGR_CORE] = 2,
+		};
+
+		pm = print_metric_csv;
+		nl = new_line_csv;
+		os.nfields = 1;
+		os.nfields += aggr_fields[stat_config.aggr_mode];
+		if (counter->cgrp)
+			os.nfields++;
+		os.run = run;
+		os.ena = ena;
+	}
 	if (run == 0 || ena == 0) {
 		aggr_printout(counter, id, nr);
 
@@ -880,6 +937,8 @@ static void printout(int id, int nr, struct perf_evsel *counter, double uval,
 			fprintf(stat_config.output, "%s%s",
 				csv_sep, counter->cgrp->name);
 
+		pm(&os, NULL, NULL, "", 0);
+		print_noise(counter, noise);
 		print_running(run, ena);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -893,8 +952,7 @@ static void printout(int id, int nr, struct perf_evsel *counter, double uval,
 	out.new_line = nl;
 	out.ctx = &os;
 
-	if (!csv_output)
-		perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(counter, uval,
+	perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(counter, uval,
 				stat_config.aggr_mode == AGGR_GLOBAL ? 0 :
 				cpu_map__id_to_cpu(id),
 				&out);
-- 
2.4.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1323917

FromJiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Date2016-02-02 11:00 +0100
Message-ID<qXFUC-Fv-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1322431
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:06:52AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Now support CSV output for metrics. With the new output callbacks
> this is relatively straight forward by creating new callbacks.
> 
> The new line callback needs to know the number of fields to skip them
> correctly
> 
> Example output before:
> 
> % perf stat -x, true
> 0.200687,,task-clock,200687,100.00
> 0,,context-switches,200687,100.00
> 0,,cpu-migrations,200687,100.00
> 40,,page-faults,200687,100.00
> 730871,,cycles,203601,100.00
> 551056,,stalled-cycles-frontend,203601,100.00
> <not supported>,,stalled-cycles-backend,0,100.00
> 385523,,instructions,203601,100.00
> 78028,,branches,203601,100.00
> 3946,,branch-misses,203601,100.00
> 
> After:
> 
> % perf stat -x, true
> 0.341119,,task-clock,0.461,CPUs utilized,0.00%,324342,100.00
> 0,,context-switches,0.000,K/sec,0.00%,324342,100.00
> 0,,cpu-migrations,0.000,K/sec,0.00%,324342,100.00
> 41,,page-faults,0.126,M/sec,0.00%,324342,100.00
> 674068,,cycles,2.078,GHz,0.00%,330887,100.00
> 508189,,stalled-cycles-frontend,82.31,frontend cycles idle,0.00%,330887,100.00
> <not supported>,,stalled-cycles-backend,,,0.00%,0,100.00
> 374932,,instructions,0.61,insn per cycle
> ,,,1.20,stalled cycles per insn,0.00%,330887,100.00
> 76540,,branches,235.985,M/sec,0.00%,330887,100.00
> 3091,,branch-misses,4.09,of all branches,0.00%,330887,100.00

$ ./perf stat -x, true
0.279104,,task-clock,0.461,CPUs utilized,279104,100.00
0,,context-switches,0.000,K/sec,279104,100.00
0,,cpu-migrations,0.000,K/sec,279104,100.00
42,,page-faults,0.150,M/sec,279104,100.00
658540,,cycles,2.359,GHz,281617,100.00
<not supported>,,stalled-cycles-frontend,,,,,0,100.00
<not supported>,,stalled-cycles-backend,,,,,0,100.00
428955,,instructions,0.65,insn per cycle

,,,,,,,281617,100.00
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  it does not look like this one is correct

84032,,branches,301.078,M/sec,281617,100.00
3628,,branch-misses,4.32,of all branches,281617,100.00

> 
> Two new fields are added: metric value and metric name before
> the running/enabled fields.

I see, I thought it was meant to be the other way around,
so I need to ask now, wouldn't this break existing parsers?

thanks,
jirka

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1324112

FromAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-02-02 15:10 +0100
Message-ID<qXJOA-43R-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1323917
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:50:20AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Two new fields are added: metric value and metric name before
> > the running/enabled fields.
> 
> I see, I thought it was meant to be the other way around,
> so I need to ask now, wouldn't this break existing parsers?

It would, but the new fields weren't around for long and I don't think there
are many users so it's probably ok
(I have a tool that uses them and I'm ok with updating it)

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web