Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1320424 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-28 09:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-02 09:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: avoid premature success when changing page attributes Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-01-28 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: avoid premature success when changing page attributes "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-02-02 09:50 +0100
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 09:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: avoid premature success when changing page attributes |
| Message-ID | <qVQr8-MW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> When __change_page_attr() finds it necessary to call
> __cpa_process_fault(), it passes its return value directly up to its
> own caller, even if this indicates success. Success to the callers,
> however, means that whatever ->numpages currently holds is the count
> of successfully processed pages. The cases when __change_page_attr()
> calls __cpa_process_fault(), otoh, don't generally mean the entire
> range got processed (as can be seen from one of the two success return
> paths in __cpa_process_fault() adjusting ->numpages).
>
> When a top level caller, like in the case of change_page_attr_set_clr()
> only meaning to alter _PAGE_NX, wants to suppress alias processing, the
> boolean value to indicate so results in __cpa_process_fault() taking
> its other successful exit path. Since ->numpages so far didn't get
> adjusted there, hitting either of the conditions that cause
> __cpa_process_fault() to get called meant early termination of the
> processing without having processed the entire range, yet still
> reporting success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> ---
> v2: Completely re-written description.
So maybe it's just me, but I'm still quite unhappy about this changelog, it's hard
to parse and doesn't really do what a good changelog should do :-/
First I'd like to quote from a mail of Andrew Morton:
"Please update the changelog to describe the current behavior.
Please also describe why you think that behavior should be changed.
ie: what's the reason for this patch.
Please update Documentation/ for this feature. Probably that's
kernel-parameters.txt for the boot option and sysctl/kernel.txt for the
procfs addition."
Alternatively:
1- first describe the symptoms of the bug - how does a user notice?
2- then describe how the code behaves today and how that is causing the bug
3- and then only describe how it's fixed.
Or:
" Current code does (A), this has a problem when (B).
We can improve this doing (C), because (D)."
This changelog concentrates excessively on implementational details, without
providing context and without touching upon the practical effects - nor does it do
a clear before/after description.
I.e. what you describe in the changelog is 90% of what a developer intimate with
this code finds interesting about the patch - but that's not what good changelogs
are about!
Could we try a v3?
Thanks,
Ingo
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 09:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: avoid premature success when changing page attributes |
| Message-ID | <qXEOR-8jh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1320424 |
>>> On 28.01.16 at 09:42, <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > Could we try a v3? Okay, I withdraw the patch: Upon further consideration it is note really clear what the intended behavior of set_memory_*() on address ranges with mapping holes is supposed to be. The original issue was with set_memory_nx() (called from mark_rodata_ro()) stumbling across an unmapped region (resulting from an out of tree change completely unmapping the kernel mappings of address ranges passed to free_init_pages()). I simply don't have the time to check whether the unmapping done with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC would have a similar effect. The net result in any event were pages (past the hole) reported as problematic when CONFIG_DEBUG_WX is enabled. Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web