Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1320226 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-28 03:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-31 20:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 4.1 000/127] 4.1.17-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-28 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4.1 000/127] 4.1.17-stable review Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-01-28 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4.1 000/127] 4.1.17-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-31 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4.1 000/127] 4.1.17-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-31 20:30 +0100
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 03:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.1 000/127] 4.1.17-stable review |
| Message-ID | <qVKlH-4HL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 01/27/2016 10:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> -------------------------
> NOTE:
> There are still a lot of pending stable patches in the queue, well
> over 400 of them to be specific, so some of your favorite/pet patches
> might not be included in these releases. Please be patient as I dig
> out from this backlog over the next few weeks. If there are specific
> patches that you just _must_ have included in a stable release soon,
> please let me know.
> -------------------------
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.17 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri Jan 29 18:07:17 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 139 pass: 138 fail: 1
Failed builds:
arm64:allmodconfig
Qemu test results:
total: 95 pass: 93 fail: 2
Failed tests:
arm64:smp:defconfig
arm64:nosmp:defconfig
arm64:allmodconfig fails to build due to a crash in recordmcount, which
is caused by 'recordmcount: arm64: Replace the ignored mcount call into nop'.
That bug can be fixed by applying upstream commit c84da8b9ad37 ("recordmcount:
Fix endianness handling bug for nop_mcount"). However, that does not help,
because after applying this patch the build is then still broken due to
'arm64: mm: use correct mapping granularity under DEBUG_RODAT'.
The arm64 qemu tests fails to to a bug inherited from mainline
(arm64:allmodconfig is also broken in mainline).
Guenter
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 09:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qVPY6-AA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1320226 |
On 28 January 2016 at 03:14, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 10:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> -------------------------
>> NOTE:
>> There are still a lot of pending stable patches in the queue, well
>> over 400 of them to be specific, so some of your favorite/pet patches
>> might not be included in these releases. Please be patient as I dig
>> out from this backlog over the next few weeks. If there are specific
>> patches that you just _must_ have included in a stable release soon,
>> please let me know.
>> -------------------------
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.17 release.
>> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Fri Jan 29 18:07:17 UTC 2016.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>
> Build results:
> total: 139 pass: 138 fail: 1
> Failed builds:
> arm64:allmodconfig
>
> Qemu test results:
> total: 95 pass: 93 fail: 2
> Failed tests:
> arm64:smp:defconfig
> arm64:nosmp:defconfig
>
> arm64:allmodconfig fails to build due to a crash in recordmcount, which
> is caused by 'recordmcount: arm64: Replace the ignored mcount call into
> nop'.
> That bug can be fixed by applying upstream commit c84da8b9ad37
> ("recordmcount:
> Fix endianness handling bug for nop_mcount"). However, that does not help,
> because after applying this patch the build is then still broken due to
> 'arm64: mm: use correct mapping granularity under DEBUG_RODAT'.
>
Apologies for not spotting that when the patches were sent out for
stable review.
'arm64: mm: use correct mapping granularity under DEBUG_RODAT' needs a
special version for -stable which #defines SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE, since
that is a recent invention.
I will follow up with a new patch, please disregard this version in
the mean time
Thanks,
Ard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qX5R8-7Wm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1320377 |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:17:10AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 January 2016 at 03:14, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > On 01/27/2016 10:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>
> >> -------------------------
> >> NOTE:
> >> There are still a lot of pending stable patches in the queue, well
> >> over 400 of them to be specific, so some of your favorite/pet patches
> >> might not be included in these releases. Please be patient as I dig
> >> out from this backlog over the next few weeks. If there are specific
> >> patches that you just _must_ have included in a stable release soon,
> >> please let me know.
> >> -------------------------
> >>
> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.17 release.
> >> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> let me know.
> >>
> >> Responses should be made by Fri Jan 29 18:07:17 UTC 2016.
> >> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>
> >
> > Build results:
> > total: 139 pass: 138 fail: 1
> > Failed builds:
> > arm64:allmodconfig
> >
> > Qemu test results:
> > total: 95 pass: 93 fail: 2
> > Failed tests:
> > arm64:smp:defconfig
> > arm64:nosmp:defconfig
> >
> > arm64:allmodconfig fails to build due to a crash in recordmcount, which
> > is caused by 'recordmcount: arm64: Replace the ignored mcount call into
> > nop'.
> > That bug can be fixed by applying upstream commit c84da8b9ad37
> > ("recordmcount:
> > Fix endianness handling bug for nop_mcount"). However, that does not help,
> > because after applying this patch the build is then still broken due to
> > 'arm64: mm: use correct mapping granularity under DEBUG_RODAT'.
> >
>
> Apologies for not spotting that when the patches were sent out for
> stable review.
> 'arm64: mm: use correct mapping granularity under DEBUG_RODAT' needs a
> special version for -stable which #defines SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE, since
> that is a recent invention.
>
> I will follow up with a new patch, please disregard this version in
> the mean time
Ok, now dropped, thanks.
greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qX5R8-7Wm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1320226 |
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:14:22PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 10:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >-------------------------
> >NOTE:
> > There are still a lot of pending stable patches in the queue, well
> > over 400 of them to be specific, so some of your favorite/pet patches
> > might not be included in these releases. Please be patient as I dig
> > out from this backlog over the next few weeks. If there are specific
> > patches that you just _must_ have included in a stable release soon,
> > please let me know.
> >-------------------------
> >
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.17 release.
> >There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Fri Jan 29 18:07:17 UTC 2016.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 139 pass: 138 fail: 1
> Failed builds:
> arm64:allmodconfig
>
> Qemu test results:
> total: 95 pass: 93 fail: 2
> Failed tests:
> arm64:smp:defconfig
> arm64:nosmp:defconfig
>
> arm64:allmodconfig fails to build due to a crash in recordmcount, which
> is caused by 'recordmcount: arm64: Replace the ignored mcount call into nop'.
> That bug can be fixed by applying upstream commit c84da8b9ad37 ("recordmcount:
> Fix endianness handling bug for nop_mcount").
I've applied this now, thanks.
Hopefully this should all be straightened out and I'll go cut the
release now...
thanks,
greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web