Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1321121 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if host bridge supports filtering of MSIs

Started byAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
First post2016-01-28 23:50 +0100
Last post2016-01-29 11:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if host  bridge supports filtering of MSIs Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2016-01-28 23:50 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if host  bridge supports filtering of MSIs Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-29 11:50 +0100

#1321121 — Re: [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if host bridge supports filtering of MSIs

FromAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date2016-01-28 23:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if host bridge supports filtering of MSIs
Message-ID<qW3y1-1JH-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 15:06 +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap MSI-X
> table in case that user get to touch this directly.
> 
> But we should allow to mmap these MSI-X tables if the PCI
> host bridge supports filtering of MSIs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> index 11fd0f0..4d68f6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,8 @@ static long vfio_pci_ioctl(void *device_data,
>  			    IORESOURCE_MEM && !pci_resources_share_page(pdev,
>  			    info.index)) {
>  				info.flags |= VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_MMAP;
> -				if (info.index == vdev->msix_bar) {
> +				if (!pci_host_bridge_msi_filtered_enabled(pdev) &&
> +				    info.index == vdev->msix_bar) {
>  					ret = msix_sparse_mmap_cap(vdev, &caps);
>  					if (ret)
>  						return ret;
> @@ -967,7 +968,8 @@ static int vfio_pci_mmap(void *device_data, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  	if (phys_len < PAGE_SIZE || req_start + req_len > phys_len)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (index == vdev->msix_bar) {
> +	if (!pci_host_bridge_msi_filtered_enabled(pdev) &&
> +	    index == vdev->msix_bar) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Disallow mmaps overlapping the MSI-X table; users don't
>  		 * get to touch this directly.  We could find somewhere

What about read()/write() access, why would we allow mmap() but not
those?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1321648

FromYongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2016-01-29 11:50 +0100
Message-ID<qWeMO-1un-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1321121
On 2016/1/29 6:46, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 15:06 +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
>> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap MSI-X
>> table in case that user get to touch this directly.
>>   
>> But we should allow to mmap these MSI-X tables if the PCI
>> host bridge supports filtering of MSIs.
>>   
>> Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c |    6 ++++--
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
>> index 11fd0f0..4d68f6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
>> @@ -555,7 +555,8 @@ static long vfio_pci_ioctl(void *device_data,
>>   			    IORESOURCE_MEM && !pci_resources_share_page(pdev,
>>   			    info.index)) {
>>   				info.flags |= VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_MMAP;
>> -				if (info.index == vdev->msix_bar) {
>> +				if (!pci_host_bridge_msi_filtered_enabled(pdev) &&
>> +				    info.index == vdev->msix_bar) {
>>   					ret = msix_sparse_mmap_cap(vdev, &caps);
>>   					if (ret)
>>   						return ret;
>> @@ -967,7 +968,8 @@ static int vfio_pci_mmap(void *device_data, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>   	if (phys_len < PAGE_SIZE || req_start + req_len > phys_len)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   
>> -	if (index == vdev->msix_bar) {
>> +	if (!pci_host_bridge_msi_filtered_enabled(pdev) &&
>> +	    index == vdev->msix_bar) {
>>   		/*
>>   		 * Disallow mmaps overlapping the MSI-X table; users don't
>>   		 * get to touch this directly.  We could find somewhere
> What about read()/write() access, why would we allow mmap() but not
> those?
>

Yes, you are right! I miss the MSI-X table check in vfio_pci_bar_rw().
I will fix it in next version. Thanks.

Regards,
Yongji Xie

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web