Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1321249 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-29 02:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-29 20:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: modinfo crc32 broken after fd44a98ae2eb Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 02:40 +0100
Duplicated module names Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2016-01-29 07:00 +0100
Re: Duplicated module names Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> - 2016-01-29 08:10 +0100
Re: Duplicated module names Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-01-29 11:30 +0100
Re: Duplicated module names Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-01-29 17:00 +0100
Re: Duplicated module names Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 20:10 +0100
| From | Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 02:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: modinfo crc32 broken after fd44a98ae2eb |
| Message-ID | <qW6cz-3Fb-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi! CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Samson Yeung <samson.yeung@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 01/28/2016 11:21 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> >> Hi Samson, >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Samson Yeung <samson.yeung@oracle.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please reply directly as I am not on this list. >>> >>> Commit "fd44a98ae2eb Fix race while loading modules" also broke 'modinfo >>> crc32', specifically, for me. >>> >>> Is this a bug, is it something strange going on with crc32, or is it >>> intended behavior? >> >> >> breaking is never intended ;-). What do you mean by "break"? Does it >> crash? > > > 'modinfo crc32' prints > > modinfo: ERROR: Module crc32 not found. > > and a return value of 1 using fd44a98ae2eb. > > Without changing the contents of /lib/modules/`uname -r`/modules.* files, > using fd44a98ae2eb^, 'modinfo crc32' gives me the expected info about crc32 > instead: > > filename: /lib/modules/4.2.0-25-generic/kernel/crypto/crc32.ko > alias: crypto-crc32 > alias: crc32 > license: GPL > description: CRC32 calculations wrapper for lib/crc32 > author: Alexander Boyko <alexander_boyko@xyratex.com> > srcversion: B0DE005719AC9ED9A3EEAD7 > depends: > intree: Y > vermagic: 4.2.0-25-generic SMP mod_unload modversions > signer: Build time autogenerated kernel key > sig_key: A4:10:30:FB:DF:1D:C9:62:B4:BB:7D:16:44:C3:33:7E:C4:16:DB:86 > sig_hashalgo: sha512 > >> I can't see how this commit is related to modinfo. You will need to >> give more details. Check if you can get the output by passing the >> complete path to the module and make sure it's actually a module (and > > > Giving the full path to the module still works as expected, so > 'modinfo /lib/modules/4.2.0-25-generic/kernel/crypto/crc32.ko' displays > module information and returns 0, using both fd44a98ae2eb^ and fd44a98ae2eb. > >> not builtin) in your kernel configuration > > > I must admit that I'm slightly confused wrt crc32, since there is > kernel/arch/x86/crypto/crc32-pclmul.ko as well as kernel/crypto/crc32.ko, > and 'modinfo crc32-pclmul' claims that crc32 is an alias. > > I This happens with a stock Ubuntu kernel (4.2.0-25-generic for Wily), > however I first observed this behavior on Redhat/Oracle Linux 7. So... it looks like we have both kernel/lib/crc32.ko and kernel/crypto/crc32.ko - module names should be global. It doesn't clash in the kernel build because kernel/lib/crc32 is builtin most of the time. With that commit in kmod there was a change on the builtin detection to fix the race. I'll take a look to fix this, but it should probably be fixed in the kernel as well. Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate modules with the same name, crc32. Could that be fixed? Lucas De Marchi
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 07:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Duplicated module names |
| Message-ID | <qWaga-6C8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1321249 |
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> writes: > Hi! > > CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists Thanks. > Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and > CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate > modules with the same name, crc32. Could that be fixed? Gah. Looks like it's been that way since at least 2014, too. I think we could rename it to crypto_crc32, but I don't think it's the only one. Marco, I think depmod should probably FAIL if two modules have the same name, which would at least find such problems. (BTW is there a nice way to figure out if a config var is a tristate? These are only problematic if both CONFIG_ are tristate.) Here's a hacky attempt to look for problems: rusty@rusty-Lemur:~/devel/kernel/linux (master)$ KCONFIGS=`find * -name 'Kconfig*'`; for m in `find [b-z]* -name 'Makefile*'`; do sed -n 's,obj-\$(CONFIG.*+= \([a-z0-9_-]\+\.o\)$,'$m' \1,p' <$m | sort -u; done | sort -k 2 | uniq -D -f 1 | while read m obj; do fgrep -w $obj $m /dev/null; done | while read LINE; do conf=`echo $LINE | sed 's/.*\$(CONFIG_\([A-Z0-9_]*\).*/\1/'`; if grep -C2 "^config $conf\$" $KCONFIGS | fgrep -q tristate; then echo $LINE; fi; done Here are the results (mildly filtered by me): drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511) += adv7511.o drivers/media/i2c/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511) += adv7511.o drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += coda.o fs/coda/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CONNECTOR_ANALOG_TV) += connector-analog-tv.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_CONNECTOR_ANALOG_TV) += connector-analog-tv.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CONNECTOR_DVI) += connector-dvi.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_CONNECTOR_DVI) += connector-dvi.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CONNECTOR_HDMI) += connector-hdmi.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_CONNECTOR_HDMI) += connector-hdmi.o crypto/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32) += crc32.o lib/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_CRC32) += crc32.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_ENCODER_OPA362) += encoder-opa362.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_ENCODER_OPA362) += encoder-opa362.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_ENCODER_TFP410) += encoder-tfp410.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_ENCODER_TFP410) += encoder-tfp410.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_ENCODER_TPD12S015) += encoder-tpd12s015.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_ENCODER_TPD12S015) += encoder-tpd12s015.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_DPI) += panel-dpi.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_DPI) += panel-dpi.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_DSI_CM) += panel-dsi-cm.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_DSI_CM) += panel-dsi-cm.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_LGPHILIPS_LB035Q02) += panel-lgphilips-lb035q02.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_LGPHILIPS_LB035Q02) += panel-lgphilips-lb035q02.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_NEC_NL8048HL11) += panel-nec-nl8048hl11.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_NEC_NL8048HL11) += panel-nec-nl8048hl11.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01) += panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01) += panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM) += panel-sony-acx565akm.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM) += panel-sony-acx565akm.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_TPO_TD028TTEC1) += panel-tpo-td028ttec1.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_TPO_TD028TTEC1) += panel-tpo-td028ttec1.o drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_TPO_TD043MTEA1) += panel-tpo-td043mtea1.o drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_TPO_TD043MTEA1) += panel-tpo-td043mtea1.o drivers/mtd/onenand/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_SAMSUNG) += samsung.o drivers/tty/serial/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG) += samsung.o sound/soc/codecs/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AC97_CODEC) += snd-soc-ac97.o sound/soc/samsung/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SAMSUNG_AC97) += snd-soc-ac97.o drivers/hwmon/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_VEXPRESS) += vexpress.o drivers/regulator/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_VEXPRESS) += vexpress.o Can maintainers please tell me which of these are harmless? Thanks! Rusty.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 08:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Duplicated module names |
| Message-ID | <qWblU-7Fm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1321492 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 29/01/16 07:54, Rusty Russell wrote: > Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> writes: >> Hi! >> >> CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists > > Thanks. > >> Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and >> CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate >> modules with the same name, crc32. Could that be fixed? > > Gah. Looks like it's been that way since at least 2014, too. > > I think we could rename it to crypto_crc32, but I don't think it's the > only one. Marco, I think depmod should probably FAIL if two modules > have the same name, which would at least find such problems. > > (BTW is there a nice way to figure out if a config var is a tristate? These > are only problematic if both CONFIG_ are tristate.) > > Here's a hacky attempt to look for problems: > > rusty@rusty-Lemur:~/devel/kernel/linux (master)$ KCONFIGS=`find * -name 'Kconfig*'`; for m in `find [b-z]* -name 'Makefile*'`; do sed -n 's,obj-\$(CONFIG.*+= \([a-z0-9_-]\+\.o\)$,'$m' \1,p' <$m | sort -u; done | sort -k 2 | uniq -D -f 1 | while read m obj; do fgrep -w $obj $m /dev/null; done | while read LINE; do conf=`echo $LINE | sed 's/.*\$(CONFIG_\([A-Z0-9_]*\).*/\1/'`; if grep -C2 "^config $conf\$" $KCONFIGS | fgrep -q tristate; then echo $LINE; fi; done > > Here are the results (mildly filtered by me): > > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511) += adv7511.o > drivers/media/i2c/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511) += adv7511.o > > drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += coda.o > fs/coda/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CONNECTOR_ANALOG_TV) += connector-analog-tv.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_CONNECTOR_ANALOG_TV) += connector-analog-tv.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CONNECTOR_DVI) += connector-dvi.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_CONNECTOR_DVI) += connector-dvi.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CONNECTOR_HDMI) += connector-hdmi.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_CONNECTOR_HDMI) += connector-hdmi.o > > crypto/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32) += crc32.o > lib/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_CRC32) += crc32.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_ENCODER_OPA362) += encoder-opa362.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_ENCODER_OPA362) += encoder-opa362.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_ENCODER_TFP410) += encoder-tfp410.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_ENCODER_TFP410) += encoder-tfp410.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_ENCODER_TPD12S015) += encoder-tpd12s015.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_ENCODER_TPD12S015) += encoder-tpd12s015.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_DPI) += panel-dpi.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_DPI) += panel-dpi.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_DSI_CM) += panel-dsi-cm.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_DSI_CM) += panel-dsi-cm.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_LGPHILIPS_LB035Q02) += panel-lgphilips-lb035q02.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_LGPHILIPS_LB035Q02) += panel-lgphilips-lb035q02.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_NEC_NL8048HL11) += panel-nec-nl8048hl11.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_NEC_NL8048HL11) += panel-nec-nl8048hl11.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01) += panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01) += panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM) += panel-sony-acx565akm.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_SONY_ACX565AKM) += panel-sony-acx565akm.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_TPO_TD028TTEC1) += panel-tpo-td028ttec1.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_TPO_TD028TTEC1) += panel-tpo-td028ttec1.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_PANEL_TPO_TD043MTEA1) += panel-tpo-td043mtea1.o > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_PANEL_TPO_TD043MTEA1) += panel-tpo-td043mtea1.o > > drivers/mtd/onenand/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_SAMSUNG) += samsung.o > drivers/tty/serial/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG) += samsung.o > > sound/soc/codecs/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AC97_CODEC) += snd-soc-ac97.o > sound/soc/samsung/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SAMSUNG_AC97) += snd-soc-ac97.o > > drivers/hwmon/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_VEXPRESS) += vexpress.o > drivers/regulator/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_VEXPRESS) += vexpress.o > > Can maintainers please tell me which of these are harmless? The duplicates under drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/ and drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/ are (hopefully) harmless, as the DRM driver and the fbdev driver are mutually exclusive. Tomi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 11:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Duplicated module names |
| Message-ID | <qWets-1lS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1321492 |
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> I think we could rename it to crypto_crc32, but I don't think it's the
> only one. Marco, I think depmod should probably FAIL if two modules
> have the same name, which would at least find such problems.
This patch renames it to crc32_generic.
---8<---
Subject: crypto: crc32 - Rename generic implementation
The generic crc32 implementation is currently called crc32. This
is a problem because it clashes with the lib implementation of crc32.
This patch renames the crypto crc32 to crc32_generic so that it is
consistent with crc32c. An alias for the driver is also added.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
diff --git a/crypto/Makefile b/crypto/Makefile
index ffe18c9..059de1b 100644
--- a/crypto/Makefile
+++ b/crypto/Makefile
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_POLY1305) += poly1305_generic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEFLATE) += deflate.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_MICHAEL_MIC) += michael_mic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C) += crc32c_generic.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32) += crc32.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32) += crc32_generic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF) += crct10dif_common.o crct10dif_generic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AUTHENC) += authenc.o authencesn.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZO) += lzo.o
diff --git a/crypto/crc32.c b/crypto/crc32_generic.c
similarity index 98%
rename from crypto/crc32.c
rename to crypto/crc32_generic.c
index 187ded2..aa2a25f 100644
--- a/crypto/crc32.c
+++ b/crypto/crc32_generic.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static struct shash_alg alg = {
.digestsize = CHKSUM_DIGEST_SIZE,
.base = {
.cra_name = "crc32",
- .cra_driver_name = "crc32-table",
+ .cra_driver_name = "crc32-generic",
.cra_priority = 100,
.cra_blocksize = CHKSUM_BLOCK_SIZE,
.cra_ctxsize = sizeof(u32),
@@ -157,3 +157,4 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexander Boyko <alexander_boyko@xyratex.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CRC32 calculations wrapper for lib/crc32");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("crc32");
+MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("crc32-generic");
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 17:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Duplicated module names |
| Message-ID | <qWjCP-5kt-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1321492 |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> writes:
>> Hi!
>>
>> CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and
>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate
>> modules with the same name, crc32. Could that be fixed?
>
> Gah. Looks like it's been that way since at least 2014, too.
>
> I think we could rename it to crypto_crc32, but I don't think it's the
> only one. Marco, I think depmod should probably FAIL if two modules
> have the same name, which would at least find such problems.
>
> (BTW is there a nice way to figure out if a config var is a tristate? These
> are only problematic if both CONFIG_ are tristate.)
>
> Here's a hacky attempt to look for problems:
>
> rusty@rusty-Lemur:~/devel/kernel/linux (master)$ KCONFIGS=`find * -name 'Kconfig*'`; for m in `find [b-z]* -name 'Makefile*'`; do sed -n 's,obj-\$(CONFIG.*+= \([a-z0-9_-]\+\.o\)$,'$m' \1,p' <$m | sort -u; done | sort -k 2 | uniq -D -f 1 | while read m obj; do fgrep -w $obj $m /dev/null; done | while read LINE; do conf=`echo $LINE | sed 's/.*\$(CONFIG_\([A-Z0-9_]*\).*/\1/'`; if grep -C2 "^config $conf\$" $KCONFIGS | fgrep -q tristate; then echo $LINE; fi; done
>
> Here are the results (mildly filtered by me):
>
[...]
>
> drivers/hwmon/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_VEXPRESS) += vexpress.o
> drivers/regulator/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_VEXPRESS) += vexpress.o
>
Indeed causes issues if both are built as modules, only once succeeds.
I will post these 2 patches separately soon.
-->8
From 1eb0d653d90e3f5fe05c6f63a17976226309e1ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:40:24 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (vexpress) rename vexpress hwmon implementation
The vexpress hwmon implementation is currently just called vexpress.
This is a problem because it clashes with another module with the same
name in regulators.
This patch renames the vexpress hwmon implementation to vexpress-hwmon
so that there will be no clash in the module namespace.
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/hwmon/{vexpress.c => vexpress-hwmon.c} | 0
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename drivers/hwmon/{vexpress.c => vexpress-hwmon.c} (100%)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
index 30c94df31465..cfc09711810c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_TMP103) += tmp103.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_TMP401) += tmp401.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_TMP421) += tmp421.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_TWL4030_MADC)+= twl4030-madc-hwmon.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_VEXPRESS) += vexpress.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_VEXPRESS) += vexpress-hwmon.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_VIA_CPUTEMP)+= via-cputemp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_VIA686A) += via686a.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_VT1211) += vt1211.o
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/vexpress.c b/drivers/hwmon/vexpress-hwmon.c
similarity index 100%
rename from drivers/hwmon/vexpress.c
rename to drivers/hwmon/vexpress-hwmon.c
--
1.9.1
From 1520bd20d3863df87ca5d9461bf5a20d3f58e385 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:44:50 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: vexpress: rename vexpress regulator
implementation
The vexpress regulator implementation is currently just called vexpress.
This is a problem because it clashes with another module with the same
name in hardware monitors.
This patch renames the vexpress regulator implementation to
vexpress-regulator so that there will be no clash in the module namespace.
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/regulator/{vexpress.c => vexpress-regulator.c} | 0
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename drivers/regulator/{vexpress.c => vexpress-regulator.c} (100%)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Makefile b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
index 980b1943fa81..755077a89a25 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_TPS65910) += tps65910-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_TPS65912) += tps65912-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_TPS80031) += tps80031-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_TWL4030) += twl-regulator.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_VEXPRESS) += vexpress.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_VEXPRESS) += vexpress-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_WM831X) += wm831x-dcdc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_WM831X) += wm831x-isink.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_WM831X) += wm831x-ldo.o
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/vexpress.c
b/drivers/regulator/vexpress-regulator.c
similarity index 100%
rename from drivers/regulator/vexpress.c
rename to drivers/regulator/vexpress-regulator.c
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 20:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Duplicated module names |
| Message-ID | <qWmAG-7Lp-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1321492 |
Hi! On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> writes: >> Hi! >> >> CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists > > Thanks. > >> Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and >> CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate >> modules with the same name, crc32. Could that be fixed? > > Gah. Looks like it's been that way since at least 2014, too. > > I think we could rename it to crypto_crc32, but I don't think it's the > only one. Marco, I think depmod should probably FAIL if two modules > have the same name, which would at least find such problems. Yes, I'll do that on kmod, but we need to pay attention to 2 things: - It's possible 2 modules with the same names if they come from different locations (with different priorities) - It doesn't fix the case in which one is a module and the other is builtin. We could still have problem with such a scenario, like was pointed out in this bug report to kmod. Lucas De Marchi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web