Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1322244 > unrolled thread
| Started by | riel@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-30 04:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-01 12:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals riel@redhat.com - 2016-01-30 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-01-30 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-01-30 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-01 12:40 +0100
| From | riel@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 04:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals |
| Message-ID | <qWuyd-51K-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
When running a microbenchmark calling an invalid syscall number
in a loop, on a nohz_full CPU, we spend a full 9% of our CPU
time in __acct_update_integrals.
This function converts cputime_t to jiffies, to a timeval, only to
convert the timeval back to microseconds before discarding it.
This patch leaves __acct_update_integrals functionally equivalent,
but speeds things up by about 12%, with 10 million calls to an
invalid syscall number dropping from 3.7 to 3.25 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
kernel/tsacct.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/tsacct.c b/kernel/tsacct.c
index 975cb49e32bf..41667b23dbd0 100644
--- a/kernel/tsacct.c
+++ b/kernel/tsacct.c
@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ void xacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *stats, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct mm_struct *mm;
- /* convert pages-usec to Mbyte-usec */
- stats->coremem = p->acct_rss_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / MB;
- stats->virtmem = p->acct_vm_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / MB;
+ /* convert pages-nsec/KB to Mbyte-usec, see __acct_update_integrals */
+ stats->coremem = p->acct_rss_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / (1000 * KB);
+ stats->virtmem = p->acct_vm_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / (1000 * KB);
mm = get_task_mm(p);
if (mm) {
/* adjust to KB unit */
@@ -125,22 +125,21 @@ static void __acct_update_integrals(struct task_struct *tsk,
{
if (likely(tsk->mm)) {
cputime_t time, dtime;
- struct timeval value;
unsigned long flags;
u64 delta;
local_irq_save(flags);
time = stime + utime;
dtime = time - tsk->acct_timexpd;
- jiffies_to_timeval(cputime_to_jiffies(dtime), &value);
- delta = value.tv_sec;
- delta = delta * USEC_PER_SEC + value.tv_usec;
+ delta = cputime_to_nsecs(dtime);
- if (delta == 0)
+ if (delta < TICK_NSEC)
goto out;
+
tsk->acct_timexpd = time;
- tsk->acct_rss_mem1 += delta * get_mm_rss(tsk->mm);
- tsk->acct_vm_mem1 += delta * tsk->mm->total_vm;
+ /* The final unit will be Mbyte-usecs, see xacct_add_tsk */
+ tsk->acct_rss_mem1 += delta * get_mm_rss(tsk->mm) / 1024;
+ tsk->acct_vm_mem1 += delta * tsk->mm->total_vm / 1024;
out:
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
--
2.5.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 06:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals |
| Message-ID | <qWvNE-5Qx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1322244 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Rik,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc1 next-20160129]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/riel-redhat-com/sched-time-remove-non-power-of-two-divides-from-__acct_update_integrals/20160130-114019
config: i386-defconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/built-in.o: In function `xacct_add_tsk':
>> (.text+0x906b0): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `xacct_add_tsk':
(.text+0x906e3): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 15:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals |
| Message-ID | <qWF0C-4FU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1322244 |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:36:02PM -0500, riel@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>
> When running a microbenchmark calling an invalid syscall number
> in a loop, on a nohz_full CPU, we spend a full 9% of our CPU
> time in __acct_update_integrals.
>
> This function converts cputime_t to jiffies, to a timeval, only to
> convert the timeval back to microseconds before discarding it.
>
> This patch leaves __acct_update_integrals functionally equivalent,
> but speeds things up by about 12%, with 10 million calls to an
> invalid syscall number dropping from 3.7 to 3.25 seconds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/tsacct.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/tsacct.c b/kernel/tsacct.c
> index 975cb49e32bf..41667b23dbd0 100644
> --- a/kernel/tsacct.c
> +++ b/kernel/tsacct.c
> @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ void xacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *stats, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm;
>
> - /* convert pages-usec to Mbyte-usec */
> - stats->coremem = p->acct_rss_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / MB;
> - stats->virtmem = p->acct_vm_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / MB;
> + /* convert pages-nsec/KB to Mbyte-usec, see __acct_update_integrals */
> + stats->coremem = p->acct_rss_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / (1000 * KB);
> + stats->virtmem = p->acct_vm_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / (1000 * KB);
> mm = get_task_mm(p);
> if (mm) {
> /* adjust to KB unit */
> @@ -125,22 +125,21 @@ static void __acct_update_integrals(struct task_struct *tsk,
> {
> if (likely(tsk->mm)) {
> cputime_t time, dtime;
> - struct timeval value;
> unsigned long flags;
> u64 delta;
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> time = stime + utime;
> dtime = time - tsk->acct_timexpd;
> - jiffies_to_timeval(cputime_to_jiffies(dtime), &value);
> - delta = value.tv_sec;
> - delta = delta * USEC_PER_SEC + value.tv_usec;
> + delta = cputime_to_nsecs(dtime);
You might want to add a comment specifying why we don't call cputime_to_usecs()
directly (because we optimize if delta < TICK_NSEC).
Although this has a good impact on nohz_full, it might have a tiny bad one on !nohz_full
because now we first convert jiffies to nsecs (which implies a multiplication by 1000)
that we later divide again by 1000. Now this is ok because I plan to convert tsk->utime/stime
to nsecs and thus remove most of the cputime_t use and conversions everywhere.
>
> - if (delta == 0)
> + if (delta < TICK_NSEC)
> goto out;
> +
> tsk->acct_timexpd = time;
> - tsk->acct_rss_mem1 += delta * get_mm_rss(tsk->mm);
> - tsk->acct_vm_mem1 += delta * tsk->mm->total_vm;
> + /* The final unit will be Mbyte-usecs, see xacct_add_tsk */
> + tsk->acct_rss_mem1 += delta * get_mm_rss(tsk->mm) / 1024;
> + tsk->acct_vm_mem1 += delta * tsk->mm->total_vm / 1024;
The use of 1024 and the change on MB above are confusing me. Why are we doing that?
Thanks.
> out:
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 19:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals |
| Message-ID | <qWHYv-7qu-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1322380 |
On 01/30/2016 09:44 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:36:02PM -0500, riel@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>>
>> When running a microbenchmark calling an invalid syscall number
>> in a loop, on a nohz_full CPU, we spend a full 9% of our CPU
>> time in __acct_update_integrals.
>>
>> This function converts cputime_t to jiffies, to a timeval, only to
>> convert the timeval back to microseconds before discarding it.
>>
>> This patch leaves __acct_update_integrals functionally equivalent,
>> but speeds things up by about 12%, with 10 million calls to an
>> invalid syscall number dropping from 3.7 to 3.25 seconds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/tsacct.c | 19 +++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/tsacct.c b/kernel/tsacct.c
>> index 975cb49e32bf..41667b23dbd0 100644
>> --- a/kernel/tsacct.c
>> +++ b/kernel/tsacct.c
>> @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ void xacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *stats, struct task_struct *p)
>> {
>> struct mm_struct *mm;
>>
>> - /* convert pages-usec to Mbyte-usec */
>> - stats->coremem = p->acct_rss_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / MB;
>> - stats->virtmem = p->acct_vm_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / MB;
>> + /* convert pages-nsec/KB to Mbyte-usec, see __acct_update_integrals */
>> + stats->coremem = p->acct_rss_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / (1000 * KB);
>> + stats->virtmem = p->acct_vm_mem1 * PAGE_SIZE / (1000 * KB);
>> mm = get_task_mm(p);
>> if (mm) {
>> /* adjust to KB unit */
>> @@ -125,22 +125,21 @@ static void __acct_update_integrals(struct task_struct *tsk,
>> {
>> if (likely(tsk->mm)) {
>> cputime_t time, dtime;
>> - struct timeval value;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> u64 delta;
>>
>> local_irq_save(flags);
>> time = stime + utime;
>> dtime = time - tsk->acct_timexpd;
>> - jiffies_to_timeval(cputime_to_jiffies(dtime), &value);
>> - delta = value.tv_sec;
>> - delta = delta * USEC_PER_SEC + value.tv_usec;
>> + delta = cputime_to_nsecs(dtime);
>
> You might want to add a comment specifying why we don't call cputime_to_usecs()
> directly (because we optimize if delta < TICK_NSEC).
>
> Although this has a good impact on nohz_full, it might have a tiny bad one on !nohz_full
> because now we first convert jiffies to nsecs (which implies a multiplication by 1000)
> that we later divide again by 1000. Now this is ok because I plan to convert tsk->utime/stime
> to nsecs and thus remove most of the cputime_t use and conversions everywhere.
Isn't cputime_t in nanoseconds even on !nohz_full systems nowadays,
due to sched_clock?
Also, a multiplication is essentially instantaneous compared to
a division, which is why Peter suggested going this way around.
>>
>> - if (delta == 0)
>> + if (delta < TICK_NSEC)
>> goto out;
>
>
>> +
>> tsk->acct_timexpd = time;
>> - tsk->acct_rss_mem1 += delta * get_mm_rss(tsk->mm);
>> - tsk->acct_vm_mem1 += delta * tsk->mm->total_vm;
>> + /* The final unit will be Mbyte-usecs, see xacct_add_tsk */
>> + tsk->acct_rss_mem1 += delta * get_mm_rss(tsk->mm) / 1024;
>> + tsk->acct_vm_mem1 += delta * tsk->mm->total_vm / 1024;
>
> The use of 1024 and the change on MB above are confusing me. Why are we doing that?
>
> Thanks.
So the compiler can just do a right shift in the frequently called
code, and have no divide at all left in __acct_update_integrals.
However, reducing the value here does seem useful for the prevention
of overflows.
The divide is saved for when the statistics are read out to
userspace.
--
All rights reversed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 12:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: remove non-power-of-two divides from __acct_update_integrals |
| Message-ID | <qXkZP-1UH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1322475 |
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:53:09PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> + delta = cputime_to_nsecs(dtime); > > > > You might want to add a comment specifying why we don't call cputime_to_usecs() > > directly (because we optimize if delta < TICK_NSEC). > > > > Although this has a good impact on nohz_full, it might have a tiny bad one on !nohz_full > > because now we first convert jiffies to nsecs (which implies a multiplication by 1000) > > that we later divide again by 1000. Now this is ok because I plan to convert tsk->utime/stime > > to nsecs and thus remove most of the cputime_t use and conversions everywhere. > > Isn't cputime_t in nanoseconds even on !nohz_full systems nowadays, > due to sched_clock? Don't think so, we still use jiffy accounting for !NOHZ_FULL. > Also, a multiplication is essentially instantaneous compared to > a division, which is why Peter suggested going this way around. Yep.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web