Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1321067 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC PATCH] selftests: use INSTALL_HDR_PATH instead of relative paths

Started byMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
First post2016-01-28 22:30 +0100
Last post2016-01-28 22:30 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC PATCH] selftests: use INSTALL_HDR_PATH instead of relative  paths Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-01-28 22:30 +0100

#1321067 — Re: [RFC PATCH] selftests: use INSTALL_HDR_PATH instead of relative paths

FromMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date2016-01-28 22:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] selftests: use INSTALL_HDR_PATH instead of relative paths
Message-ID<qW2iC-UG-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:57 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> > On 14/01/16 03:37, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > >
> > > Does the patch below work for you? It uses INSTALL_HDR_PATH if it is
> > > defined,
> > > or otherwise KERNEL_HEADERS if it is defined, or finally it guesses at
> > > ../../../usr/include (ie. the base of the source tree).
> > >
> >
> > Yes it does work fine. So feel free to add my tested-by when you post
> > the patch. Thanks for the quick and clean fix.
> >
>
> Any update on this patch ?

Sorry, got stuck behind other stuff.

Will try and get it sent out next week.

cheers

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web