Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1318860 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add bit masking for tdp_limit

Started byGioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
First post2016-01-27 12:10 +0100
Last post2016-01-28 04:00 +0100
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add bit masking for tdp_limit Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com> - 2016-01-27 12:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add bit masking for tdp_limit Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-01-27 12:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add bit masking for tdp_limit Gi-Oh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com> - 2016-01-28 10:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add bit masking for tdp_limit Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-28 04:00 +0100

#1318860 — [PATCH] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add bit masking for tdp_limit

FromGioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
Date2016-01-27 12:10 +0100
Subject[PATCH] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add bit masking for tdp_limit
Message-ID<qVw94-2C5-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Add bit masking to read ApmTdpLimit precisely

Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
---
 drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
index f77eb97..4f695d8 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
@@ -90,7 +90,15 @@ static ssize_t show_power(struct device *dev,
 	pci_bus_read_config_dword(f4->bus, PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(f4->devfn), 5),
 				  REG_TDP_LIMIT3, &val);
 
-	tdp_limit = val >> 16;
+	/*
+	 * On Carrizo and later platforms, ApmTdpLimit bit field
+	 * is extended to 16:31 from 16:28.
+	 */
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x60)
+		tdp_limit = val >> 16;
+	else
+		tdp_limit = (val >> 16) & 0x1fff;
+
 	curr_pwr_watts = ((u64)(tdp_limit +
 				data->base_tdp)) << running_avg_range;
 	curr_pwr_watts -= running_avg_capture;
-- 
2.5.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1318865

FromBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date2016-01-27 12:20 +0100
Message-ID<qVwiK-2Fz-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1318860
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:02:09PM +0100, Gioh Kim wrote:
> Add bit masking to read ApmTdpLimit precisely
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> index f77eb97..4f695d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,15 @@ static ssize_t show_power(struct device *dev,
>  	pci_bus_read_config_dword(f4->bus, PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(f4->devfn), 5),
>  				  REG_TDP_LIMIT3, &val);
>  
> -	tdp_limit = val >> 16;
> +	/*
> +	 * On Carrizo and later platforms, ApmTdpLimit bit field
> +	 * is extended to 16:31 from 16:28.
> +	 */
> +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x60)
> +		tdp_limit = val >> 16;
> +	else
> +		tdp_limit = (val >> 16) & 0x1fff;
> +
>  	curr_pwr_watts = ((u64)(tdp_limit +
>  				data->base_tdp)) << running_avg_range;
>  	curr_pwr_watts -= running_avg_capture;
> -- 

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

Btw, Rui, you could consider unifying the code under a single

	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x60) {
		...

	else
		...

as with this patch you'll have two of those checks. Unified might be
better readable but that is for another patch.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1320454

FromGi-Oh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
Date2016-01-28 10:10 +0100
Message-ID<qVQKv-1al-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1318865

On 28.01.2016 03:25, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:12:56PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:02:09PM +0100, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>> Add bit masking to read ApmTdpLimit precisely
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
>>> index f77eb97..4f695d8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
>>> @@ -90,7 +90,15 @@ static ssize_t show_power(struct device *dev,
>>>   	pci_bus_read_config_dword(f4->bus, PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(f4->devfn), 5),
>>>   				  REG_TDP_LIMIT3, &val);
>>>   
>>> -	tdp_limit = val >> 16;
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * On Carrizo and later platforms, ApmTdpLimit bit field
>>> +	 * is extended to 16:31 from 16:28.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x60)
>>> +		tdp_limit = val >> 16;
>>> +	else
>>> +		tdp_limit = (val >> 16) & 0x1fff;
>>> +
>>>   	curr_pwr_watts = ((u64)(tdp_limit +
>>>   				data->base_tdp)) << running_avg_range;
>>>   	curr_pwr_watts -= running_avg_capture;
>>> -- 
>> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
>>
>> Btw, Rui, you could consider unifying the code under a single
>>
>> 	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x60) {
>> 		...
>>
>> 	else
>> 		...
>>
>> as with this patch you'll have two of those checks. Unified might be
>> better readable but that is for another patch.
>>
> Make sence, I will do that. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Rui
Agree. It'll be better.
Thank you.


-- 
Best regards,
Gi-Oh Kim

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1320247

FromGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date2016-01-28 04:00 +0100
Message-ID<qVKYq-4XC-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1318860
On 01/27/2016 03:02 AM, Gioh Kim wrote:
> Add bit masking to read ApmTdpLimit precisely
>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>

Applied.

Thanks,
Guenter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web