Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1319448 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 4.1 125/127] fix the regression from "direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof"

Started byGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2016-01-27 20:20 +0100
Last post2016-01-27 20:20 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 4.1 125/127] fix the regression from "direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof" Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-27 20:20 +0100

#1319448 — [PATCH 4.1 125/127] fix the regression from "direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof"

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-01-27 20:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 4.1 125/127] fix the regression from "direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof"
Message-ID<qVDNi-8kN-71@gated-at.bofh.it>
4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

commit 2d4594acbf6d8f75a27f3578476b6a27d8b13ebb upstream.

Sure, it's better to bail out of past-the-eof read and return 0 than return
a bogus negative value on such.  Only we'd better make sure we are bailing out
with 0 and not -ENOMEM...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/direct-io.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb
 		if (dio->flags & DIO_LOCKING)
 			mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 		kmem_cache_free(dio_cache, dio);
+		retval = 0;
 		goto out;
 	}
 

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web