Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1316843 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v4 10/22] kthread: Allow to modify delayed kthread work

Started byPetr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
First post2016-01-25 16:50 +0100
Last post2016-01-25 20:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v4 10/22] kthread: Allow to modify delayed kthread work Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-01-25 16:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v4 10/22] kthread: Allow to modify delayed kthread work Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-01-25 20:20 +0100

#1316843 — [PATCH v4 10/22] kthread: Allow to modify delayed kthread work

FromPetr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Date2016-01-25 16:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH v4 10/22] kthread: Allow to modify delayed kthread work
Message-ID<qURyW-64A-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
There are situations when we need to modify the delay of a delayed kthread
work. For example, when the work depends on an event and the initial delay
means a timeout. Then we want to queue the work immediately when the event
happens.

This patch implements mod_delayed_kthread_work() as inspired workqueues.
It tries to cancel the pending work and queue it again with the
given timeout.

A very special case is when the work is being canceled at the same time.
cancel_*kthread_work_sync() operation blocks queuing until the running
work finishes. Therefore we do nothing and let cancel() win. This should
not normally happen as the caller is supposed to synchronize these
operations a reasonable way.

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
 include/linux/kthread.h |  4 ++++
 kernel/kthread.c        | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/kthread.h b/include/linux/kthread.h
index dd2a587a2bd7..f501dfeaa0e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/kthread.h
+++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
@@ -168,6 +168,10 @@ bool queue_delayed_kthread_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
 				struct delayed_kthread_work *dwork,
 				unsigned long delay);
 
+bool mod_delayed_kthread_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
+			      struct delayed_kthread_work *dwork,
+			      unsigned long delay);
+
 void flush_kthread_work(struct kthread_work *work);
 void flush_kthread_worker(struct kthread_worker *worker);
 
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 6e2eeca08d5f..ebb91848685f 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -1013,6 +1013,56 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/**
+ * mod_delayed_kthread_work - modify delay of or queue a delayed kthread work
+ * @worker: kthread worker to use
+ * @dwork: delayed kthread work to queue
+ * @delay: number of jiffies to wait before queuing
+ *
+ * If @dwork is idle, equivalent to queue_delayed_kthread work(). Otherwise,
+ * modify @dwork's timer so that it expires after @delay. If @delay is zero,
+ * @work is guaranteed to be queued immediately.
+ *
+ * Return: %false if @dwork was idle and queued. Return %true if @dwork was
+ * pending and its timer was modified.
+ *
+ * A special case is when cancel_work_sync() is running in parallel.
+ * It blocks further queuing. We let the cancel() win and return %false.
+ * The caller is supposed to synchronize these operations a reasonable way.
+ *
+ * This function is safe to call from any context including IRQ handler.
+ * See try_to_grab_pending_kthread_work() for details.
+ */
+bool mod_delayed_kthread_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
+			      struct delayed_kthread_work *dwork,
+			      unsigned long delay)
+{
+	struct kthread_work *work = &dwork->work;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+try_again:
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->lock, flags);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(work->worker && work->worker != worker);
+
+	if (work->canceling)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = try_to_cancel_kthread_work(work, &worker->lock, &flags);
+	if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+		goto try_again;
+
+	if (work->canceling)
+		ret = 0;
+	else
+		__queue_delayed_kthread_work(worker, dwork, delay);
+
+out:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&worker->lock, flags);
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mod_delayed_kthread_work);
+
 static bool __cancel_kthread_work_sync(struct kthread_work *work)
 {
 	struct kthread_worker *worker;
-- 
1.8.5.6

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1317224

FromTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date2016-01-25 20:20 +0100
Message-ID<qUUQa-cl-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1316843
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:44:59PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> +bool mod_delayed_kthread_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
> +			      struct delayed_kthread_work *dwork,
> +			      unsigned long delay)
> +{
> +	struct kthread_work *work = &dwork->work;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +try_again:
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->lock, flags);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(work->worker && work->worker != worker);
> +
> +	if (work->canceling)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = try_to_cancel_kthread_work(work, &worker->lock, &flags);
> +	if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> +		goto try_again;
> +
> +	if (work->canceling)

Does this test need to be repeated?  How would ->canceling change
while worker->lock is held?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web