Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1315862 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-24 12:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-25 18:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
tty: kmalloc size WARNING in vc_do_resize Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-24 12:30 +0100
Re: tty: kmalloc size WARNING in vc_do_resize One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-01-25 17:20 +0100
Re: tty: kmalloc size WARNING in vc_do_resize Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-25 18:10 +0100
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 12:30 +0100 |
| Subject | tty: kmalloc size WARNING in vc_do_resize |
| Message-ID | <qUr1M-407-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello,
The following program triggers kmalloc size WARNING in vc_do_resize:
// autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <termios.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
int main()
{
int fd = open("/dev/tty1", O_RDWR);
struct winsize ws;
ws.ws_row = 0x1000;
ws.ws_col = 0x5dc;
ws.ws_xpixel = 0x2;
ws.ws_ypixel = 0x0;
ioctl(fd, TIOCSWINSZ, &ws);
return 0;
}
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7642 at mm/page_alloc.c:2999
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7d2/0x1760()
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 PID: 7642 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.4.0+ #276
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
00000000ffffffff ffff88006d24f610 ffffffff82999e2d 0000000000000000
ffff880060d9af80 ffffffff86475560 ffff88006d24f650 ffffffff81352089
ffffffff816721e2 ffffffff86475560 0000000000000bb7 00000000024240c0
Call Trace:
[< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15
[<ffffffff82999e2d>] dump_stack+0x6f/0xa2 lib/dump_stack.c:50
[<ffffffff81352089>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:482
[<ffffffff813522b9>] warn_slowpath_null+0x29/0x30 kernel/panic.c:515
[< inline >] __alloc_pages_slowpath mm/page_alloc.c:2999
[<ffffffff816721e2>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7d2/0x1760 mm/page_alloc.c:3253
[<ffffffff8174a799>] alloc_pages_current+0xe9/0x450 mm/mempolicy.c:2090
[< inline >] alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:459
[<ffffffff8166df66>] alloc_kmem_pages+0x16/0x100 mm/page_alloc.c:3433
[<ffffffff816c698f>] kmalloc_order+0x1f/0x80 mm/slab_common.c:1008
[<ffffffff816c6a0f>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x1f/0x140 mm/slab_common.c:1019
[< inline >] kmalloc_large include/linux/slab.h:395
[<ffffffff8175b624>] __kmalloc+0x2f4/0x340 mm/slub.c:3557
[< inline >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:468
[<ffffffff82d47800>] vc_do_resize+0x2c0/0x1140 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:874
[<ffffffff82d4878a>] vt_resize+0xaa/0xe0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:993
[< inline >] tiocswinsz drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2357
[<ffffffff82cf22b3>] tty_ioctl+0x1083/0x2160 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2869
[< inline >] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:43
[<ffffffff817efdac>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x18c/0xfb0 fs/ioctl.c:674
[< inline >] SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:689
[<ffffffff817f0c5f>] SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:680
[<ffffffff86336c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:185
---[ end trace cc28f7cc9d447282 ]---
I think that either the kmalloc should use __GFP_NOWARN or
vc_do_resize should do stricter size check.
On commit 30f05309bde49295e02e45c7e615f73aa4e0ccc2.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-25 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUS1Y-6yn-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1315862 |
> I think that either the kmalloc should use __GFP_NOWARN or > vc_do_resize should do stricter size check. vc_do_resize doesn't know enough to do a stricter size check. There are not many methods it calls but those are: vgacon_resize doesn't error when stupid things happen because of a silly hack for legacy svgatextmode tools. sisusbcon_resize does the right checks but we can get in a situation where we unplug during a resize so attempting to resize and size back might fail. fbcon_resize does the right thing, but again can error if we go size/resize/size back. That means we really have to guess or would have to add 'max size' info the structures. Right now it's clamped to 1Gbyte which is a 32767 x 32767 character display and probably ludicrous. Clamping to 4048 x 1024 chars would cover displays up to 16K x 6K even with the 4x6 font (which is insane on a 4K display, let alone 4 of them). Alan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-25 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUSOm-7cE-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1316944 |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:12 PM, One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: >> I think that either the kmalloc should use __GFP_NOWARN or >> vc_do_resize should do stricter size check. > > vc_do_resize doesn't know enough to do a stricter size check. There are > not many methods it calls but those are: > > vgacon_resize doesn't error when stupid things happen because of a silly > hack for legacy svgatextmode tools. > > sisusbcon_resize does the right checks but we can get in a situation > where we unplug during a resize so attempting to resize and size back > might fail. > > fbcon_resize does the right thing, but again can error if we go > size/resize/size back. > > That means we really have to guess or would have to add 'max size' info > the structures. Right now it's clamped to 1Gbyte which is a 32767 x 32767 > character display and probably ludicrous. Clamping to 4048 x 1024 chars > would cover displays up to 16K x 6K even with the 4x6 font (which is > insane on a 4K display, let alone 4 of them). OK, then kmalloc call needs to include __GFP_NOWARN for cases when size is too large (large than 8MB).
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web