Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1315979 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-24 22:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-25 09:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2] Add support for usbfs zerocopy. Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-24 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] Add support for usbfs zerocopy. "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com> - 2016-01-25 09:10 +0100
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 22:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] Add support for usbfs zerocopy. |
| Message-ID | <qUAeK-2a9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:19:13AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Add a new interface for userspace to preallocate memory that can be > used with usbfs. This gives two primary benefits: Something is really wrong with your email client, it is saying this is sent on Nov 26, the same exact time as your previous patch, yet you sent this in January. Which implies that this is an old patch and not an updated one :( Can you send me the latest verison of this, with the date set properly on your machine for it? thanks, greg k-h
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-25 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUKnM-11i-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1315979 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 01:12:08PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Something is really wrong with your email client, it is saying this is > sent on Nov 26, the same exact time as your previous patch, yet you sent > this in January. Which implies that this is an old patch and not an > updated one :( It comes directly from git format-patch. I guess git commit --amend doesn't properly reset the date? > Can you send me the latest verison of this, with the date set properly > on your machine for it? I did git rebase --ignore-date HEAD^ just to reset the date. Sending it as an attachment just to be sure. /* Steinar */ -- Software Engineer, Google Switzerland
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web