Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1315653 > unrolled thread
| Started by | <mika.penttila@nextfour.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-23 16:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-26 03:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 4/4] make apply_to_page_range() more robust. <mika.penttila@nextfour.com> - 2016-01-23 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] make apply_to_page_range() more robust. David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-01-26 03:40 +0100
| From | <mika.penttila@nextfour.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-23 16:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/4] make apply_to_page_range() more robust. |
| Message-ID | <qU7Z8-4tS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>
Now the arm/arm64 don't trigger this BUG_ON() any more,
but WARN_ON() is here enough to catch buggy callers
but still let potential other !size callers pass with warning.
Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä mika.penttila@nextfour.com
---
mm/memory.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 30991f8..9178ee6 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1871,7 +1871,9 @@ int apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end = addr + size;
int err;
- BUG_ON(addr >= end);
+ if (WARN_ON(addr >= end))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
do {
next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 03:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qV1HX-4RV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1315653 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, mika.penttila@nextfour.com wrote: > From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@nextfour.com> > > > Now the arm/arm64 don't trigger this BUG_ON() any more, > but WARN_ON() is here enough to catch buggy callers > but still let potential other !size callers pass with warning. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä mika.penttila@nextfour.com Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web