Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1314141 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-21 13:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-21 21:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-01-21 13:10 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-21 18:30 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-01-21 19:30 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-21 20:30 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-01-21 21:10 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-21 21:50 +0100
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 13:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5 |
| Message-ID | <qTmdR-545-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
> One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large
> files:
>
> .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++
> .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++
>
> and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine.
Not to mention the PNG image:
> .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png | Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTrdx-8tf-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1314141 |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
>
> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large
> > files:
> >
> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine.
>
> Not to mention the PNG image:
>
> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png | Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes
Most diagrams will be .svg. But if the .png is too objectionable, it
would not be too big a deal to remove it.
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 19:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTs9A-Dg-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1314369 |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
>>
>> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large
>> > files:
>> >
>> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >
>> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine.
>>
>> Not to mention the PNG image:
>>
>> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png | Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes
>
> Most diagrams will be .svg. But if the .png is too objectionable, it
> would not be too big a deal to remove it.
>
> Thoughts?
Too late, it's in git history...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTt5F-1hZ-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1314396 |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:28:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney > <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from: > >> > >> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large > >> > files: > >> > > >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++ > >> > > >> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine. > >> > >> Not to mention the PNG image: > >> > >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png | Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes > > > > Most diagrams will be .svg. But if the .png is too objectionable, it > > would not be too big a deal to remove it. > > > > Thoughts? > > Too late, it's in git history... There is always "git rm". Or is your concern instead the size of the .git/objects directory? Thanx, Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTtIm-1Np-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1314450 |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:28:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney
>> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
>> >>
>> >> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large
>> >> > files:
>> >> >
>> >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >
>> >> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine.
>> >>
>> >> Not to mention the PNG image:
>> >>
>> >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png | Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes
>> >
>> > Most diagrams will be .svg. But if the .png is too objectionable, it
>> > would not be too big a deal to remove it.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> Too late, it's in git history...
>
> There is always "git rm". Or is your concern instead the size of the
> .git/objects directory?
My only remark is that if we don't want PNGs, they shouldn't enter git history,
as "git rm" doesn't really remove them. So we can't get rid of the existing
ones, but we can still think about if we want (no) more of them...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTul4-23q-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1314481 |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 09:04:24PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Paul E. McKenney > <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:28:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney > >> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > >> >> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from: > >> >> > >> >> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large > >> >> > files: > >> >> > > >> >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++ > >> >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++ > >> >> > > >> >> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine. > >> >> > >> >> Not to mention the PNG image: > >> >> > >> >> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png | Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes > >> > > >> > Most diagrams will be .svg. But if the .png is too objectionable, it > >> > would not be too big a deal to remove it. > >> > > >> > Thoughts? > >> > >> Too late, it's in git history... > > > > There is always "git rm". Or is your concern instead the size of the > > .git/objects directory? > > My only remark is that if we don't want PNGs, they shouldn't enter git history, > as "git rm" doesn't really remove them. So we can't get rid of the existing > ones, but we can still think about if we want (no) more of them... Fair enough! For whatever it is worth, we do have a number of .pbm, .ppm, and .pdf files. Thanx, Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web