Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1314316 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-21 17:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org> - 2016-01-27 06:30 +0100

#1314316 — Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:11:39PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> A driver calling mipi_dsi_device_new might want to unregister the device
> once it's done. It might also require it in an error handling path in
> case something didn't go right.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> index cb084af..410d8b5 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,11 @@ ssize_t mipi_dsi_generic_read(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi, const void *params,
>  
>  struct mipi_dsi_device *mipi_dsi_device_new(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>  					    struct mipi_dsi_device_info *info);
> +static inline void mipi_dsi_device_unregister(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> +	device_unregister(&dsi->dev);
> +}

This is the same, essentially, as mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn(). I think
this should move into drm_mipi_dsi.c and mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn()
should call this new function so that both OF and !OF share the same
code for this.

Thierry

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1318665

On 01/21/2016 09:42 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:11:39PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> A driver calling mipi_dsi_device_new might want to unregister the device
>> once it's done. It might also require it in an error handling path in
>> case something didn't go right.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> index cb084af..410d8b5 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> @@ -195,6 +195,11 @@ ssize_t mipi_dsi_generic_read(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi, const void *params,
>>
>>   struct mipi_dsi_device *mipi_dsi_device_new(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>   					    struct mipi_dsi_device_info *info);
>> +static inline void mipi_dsi_device_unregister(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>> +{
>> +	device_unregister(&dsi->dev);
>> +}
>
> This is the same, essentially, as mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn(). I think
> this should move into drm_mipi_dsi.c and mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn()
> should call this new function so that both OF and !OF share the same
> code for this.

I can do this.

Thanks,
Archit


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web