Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1314282 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Han Xu <xhnjupt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-21 16:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-24 06:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a Han Xu <xhnjupt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:50 +0100
RE: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@nxp.com> - 2016-01-22 10:10 +0100
Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a Han Xu <xhnjupt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 18:40 +0100
Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 22:20 +0100
Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@nxp.com> - 2016-01-24 06:00 +0100
| From | Han Xu <xhnjupt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 16:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a |
| Message-ID | <qTpEK-7eF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com> wrote: > This patch set is used for add the fsl-quadspi support for ls1021a and > ls1043a, so remove the patch: > mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: extend support for some special requerment. Please use --cover-letter to generate cover letter. > > This patch will be send with anther patch set for add QSPI support on LS2080A. > > All the new property are document in anther patch set which is already > send to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org and devicetree@vger.kernel.org. > Here is the patch name: > 0001-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-dspi-compa.patch > 0002-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-qspi-compa.patch > 0003-dts-ls2080a-update-the-DTS-for-QSPI-and-DSPI-support.patch > 0004-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-optional-properties.patch > > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/ Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable. > > Thanks. > > Yuan Yao. > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@nxp.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTFTd-1Xj-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1314282 |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@gmail.com > wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com> wrote: > > This patch set is used for add the fsl-quadspi support for ls1021a and > > ls1043a, so remove the patch: > > mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: extend support for some special requerment. > > Please use --cover-letter to generate cover letter. > > > > > This patch will be send with anther patch set for add QSPI support on LS2080A. > > > > All the new property are document in anther patch set which is already > > send to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org and devicetree@vger.kernel.org. > > Here is the patch name: > > 0001-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-dspi-compa.patch > > 0002-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-qspi-compa.patch > > 0003-dts-ls2080a-update-the-DTS-for-QSPI-and-DSPI-support.patch > > 0004-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-optional-properties.patch > > > > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/ > > Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable. > Thanks for your review. But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to devicetree@vger.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer. Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately. So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer. How about your think? Thanks. Yuan Yao.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Han Xu <xhnjupt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTNQK-7gK-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1314839 |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@nxp.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@gmail.com > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com> wrote: >> > This patch set is used for add the fsl-quadspi support for ls1021a and >> > ls1043a, so remove the patch: >> > mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: extend support for some special requerment. >> >> Please use --cover-letter to generate cover letter. >> >> > >> > This patch will be send with anther patch set for add QSPI support on LS2080A. >> > >> > All the new property are document in anther patch set which is already >> > send to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org and devicetree@vger.kernel.org. >> > Here is the patch name: >> > 0001-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-dspi-compa.patch >> > 0002-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-qspi-compa.patch >> > 0003-dts-ls2080a-update-the-DTS-for-QSPI-and-DSPI-support.patch >> > 0004-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-optional-properties.patch >> > >> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork: >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/ >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/ >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/ >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/ >> >> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable. >> > > Thanks for your review. > But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to devicetree@vger.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer. > > Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately. > > So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer. > > How about your think? Send the complete patch set to maintainer and cc all related sub-module groups, so everybody could understand the whole story. > Thanks. > > Yuan Yao.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-23 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUdLc-1BD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1315165 |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:30:55AM -0600, Han Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@nxp.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@gmail.com > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com> wrote: > >> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork: > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/ > >> > >> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable. > >> > > > > Thanks for your review. > > But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to devicetree@vger.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer. > > > > Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately. > > > > So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer. > > > > How about your think? > > Send the complete patch set to maintainer and cc all related > sub-module groups, so everybody could understand the whole story. Agreed. You apparently did not read the suggested documentation from last time: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt Particularly, points 2 and 3. Subsystem maintainers merge binding patches, so please send them as part of the regular series. Brian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@nxp.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 06:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUkWl-81Y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1315758 |
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 05:17 AM +0800, Brian Norris wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:30:55AM -0600, Han Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@nxp.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@gmail.com > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@freescale.com> wrote: > >> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork: > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/ > >> > >> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable. > >> > > > > Thanks for your review. > > But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to devicetree@vger.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer. > > > > Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately. > > > > So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer. > > > > How about your think? > > Send the complete patch set to maintainer and cc all related > sub-module groups, so everybody could understand the whole story. Agreed. You apparently did not read the suggested documentation from last time: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt Particularly, points 2 and 3. Subsystem maintainers merge binding patches, so please send them as part of the regular series. OK, Got it. Thanks Han Xu and Brian Norris. I will resend them as a complete patch set.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web