Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1313278 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl

Started byJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
First post2016-01-20 16:10 +0100
Last post2016-01-27 03:40 +0100
Articles 5 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2016-01-20 16:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in  lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com> - 2016-01-20 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl "Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-20 17:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in  lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de> - 2016-01-20 23:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2016-01-27 03:40 +0100

#1313278 — [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl

FromJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Date2016-01-20 16:10 +0100
Subject[PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
Message-ID<qT2yu-8hL-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
This removes a redundant code block that will either be executed if the
ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just
duplicated in both cases, hence we unify it again.

This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 17 -----------------
 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
index 152b3c8..3bd0be6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
@@ -4139,23 +4139,6 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *pIocbIn,
 	/* The sdev is not guaranteed to be valid post scsi_done upcall. */
 	cmd->scsi_done(cmd);
 
-	if (phba->cfg_poll & ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
-		lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
-
-		/*
-		 * If there is a thread waiting for command completion
-		 * wake up the thread.
-		 */
-		spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
-		if (lpfc_cmd->waitq)
-			wake_up(lpfc_cmd->waitq);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
-		lpfc_release_scsi_buf(phba, lpfc_cmd);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 	lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
-- 
2.7.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1313319 — Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl

FromTomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Date2016-01-20 17:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
Message-ID<qT3uy-vq-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1313278
On 20.1.2016 16:08, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> This removes a redundant code block that will either be executed if the
> ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just
> duplicated in both cases, hence we unify it again.
>
> This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>

Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>

Tomas

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 17 -----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> index 152b3c8..3bd0be6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> @@ -4139,23 +4139,6 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *pIocbIn,
>  	/* The sdev is not guaranteed to be valid post scsi_done upcall. */
>  	cmd->scsi_done(cmd);
>  
> -	if (phba->cfg_poll & ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING) {
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
> -		lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * If there is a thread waiting for command completion
> -		 * wake up the thread.
> -		 */
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> -		if (lpfc_cmd->waitq)
> -			wake_up(lpfc_cmd->waitq);
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> -		lpfc_release_scsi_buf(phba, lpfc_cmd);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
>  	lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1313330

From"Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2016-01-20 17:20 +0100
Message-ID<qT3Ee-yP-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1313278
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1313539 — Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl

FromSebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
Date2016-01-20 23:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
Message-ID<qT8Xg-3WS-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1313278
Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> This removes a redundant code block that will either be executed if the
> ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just
> duplicated in both cases, hence we unify it again.
> 
> This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>

Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1318565

From"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Date2016-01-27 03:40 +0100
Message-ID<qVobv-53J-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1313278
>>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> writes:

Johannes> This removes a redundant code block that will either be
Johannes> executed if the ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in
Johannes> phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just duplicated in both
Johannes> cases, hence we unify it again.

Johannes> This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.

James/Dick: Please review.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web