Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1311662 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build failure

Started byGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
First post2016-01-18 17:40 +0100
Last post2016-01-20 07:40 +0100
Articles 6 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build  failure Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-18 17:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build  failure Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 18:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build  failure Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-18 18:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build  failure Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 07:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build  failure Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-01-20 07:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build  failure Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 07:40 +0100

#1311662 — Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build failure

FromGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date2016-01-18 17:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build failure
Message-ID<qSl0u-3eo-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>>>> If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
> <snip>
>>>
>>> Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
>>> My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
>>> I could set up a managed list there.
>>
>> Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org
>
> yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
> list then it will not look nice. :)
>

How about just using kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.

Guenter

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1311685

FromSudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-18 18:10 +0100
Message-ID<qSltw-3KT-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1311662
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>>>On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>>>>If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
> ><snip>
> >>>
> >>>Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
> >>>My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
> >>>I could set up a managed list there.
> >>
> >>Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org
> >
> >yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
> >list then it will not look nice. :)
> >
> 
> How about just using kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
> for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.

Great. I am subscribing to it.

regards
sudip

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1311688

FromGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date2016-01-18 18:20 +0100
Message-ID<qSlDc-3Oc-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1311685
On 01/18/2016 09:04 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>> On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
>>>>> My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
>>>>> I could set up a managed list there.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org
>>>
>>> yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
>>> list then it will not look nice. :)
>>>
>>
>> How about just using kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
>> for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.
>
> Great. I am subscribing to it.
>

Let's check on the list first. I'll send am e-mail.

Guenter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1312900

FromSudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-20 07:00 +0100
Message-ID<qSTYe-28T-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1311688
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:17:34AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/18/2016 09:04 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >>>>On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>>>On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >>>>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
> >>><snip>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
> >>>>>My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
> >>>>>I could set up a managed list there.
> >>>>
> >>>>Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org
> >>>
> >>>yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
> >>>list then it will not look nice. :)
> >>>
> >>
> >>How about just using kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
> >>for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.
> >
> >Great. I am subscribing to it.
> >
> 
> Let's check on the list first. I'll send am e-mail.

I guess no reply means we can use the list...

regards
sudip

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1312913

FromGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date2016-01-20 07:30 +0100
Message-ID<qSUrf-2Au-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1312900
On 01/19/2016 09:51 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:17:34AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 01/18/2016 09:04 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>>> On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
>>>>>>> My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
>>>>>>> I could set up a managed list there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
>>>>> list then it will not look nice. :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How about just using kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
>>>> for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.
>>>
>>> Great. I am subscribing to it.
>>>
>>
>> Let's check on the list first. I'll send am e-mail.
>
> I guess no reply means we can use the list...
>

Let's wait until tomorrow; then I'll try to reach the vger majordomo maintainer again
as well as the vger postmaster. We'll need something from there - at the very least
we'll need to get a new list owner. Of course, it would help if someone listening in
to this thread knows how to contact an actual person controlling vger.kernel.org.

Guenter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1312917

FromSudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-20 07:40 +0100
Message-ID<qSUAV-2Ev-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1312913
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:27:12PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/19/2016 09:51 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:17:34AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>On 01/18/2016 09:04 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >>>>>On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >>>>>>On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>>>On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>>>On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
> >>>>><snip>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
> >>>>>>>My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
> >>>>>>>I could set up a managed list there.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
> >>>>>list then it will not look nice. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>How about just using kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
> >>>>for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.
> >>>
> >>>Great. I am subscribing to it.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Let's check on the list first. I'll send am e-mail.
> >
> >I guess no reply means we can use the list...
> >
> 
> Let's wait until tomorrow; then I'll try to reach the vger majordomo maintainer again
> as well as the vger postmaster. We'll need something from there - at the very least
> we'll need to get a new list owner. Of course, it would help if someone listening in
> to this thread knows how to contact an actual person controlling vger.kernel.org.

Try reaching "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>

regards
sudip

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web