Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1310101 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] gpio: max77620: fix of_table.cocci warnings

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] gpio: max77620: fix of_table.cocci warnings Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-01-15 14:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] gpio: max77620: fix of_table.cocci warnings Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-01-15 14:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] gpio: max77620: fix of_table.cocci warnings Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-18 13:20 +0100

#1310101 — Re: [PATCH] gpio: max77620: fix of_table.cocci warnings

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2016 03:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Make sure (of/i2c/platform)_device_id tables are NULL terminated
>>>>
>>>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/of_table.cocci
>>>>
>>>> CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
>>>
>>> This is merged into the MFD subsystem for the moment so patches
>>> have to go through Lee.
>>>
>>> Alternatively I can go back and fix it up later.
>>
>> Pull request for v4.5 has already been sent.
>>
>> Feel free to take the patch into your tree post -rc1.
>
> Is the driver gpio-max77620 applied?

Nah, I misunderstood it, don't worry. Lee just merged the core
driver(s). I have no idea what Julia's patch is based on, I was
confused by this mail so I assumed it was in the tree but it
was not. The world is full of mysteries :D

> I think still there is discussion going on the patches?

Sure let's work on this for the next cycle.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1310124

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 January 2016 03:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Make sure (of/i2c/platform)_device_id tables are NULL terminated
> >>>>
> >>>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/of_table.cocci
> >>>>
> >>>> CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> This is merged into the MFD subsystem for the moment so patches
> >>> have to go through Lee.
> >>>
> >>> Alternatively I can go back and fix it up later.
> >>
> >> Pull request for v4.5 has already been sent.
> >>
> >> Feel free to take the patch into your tree post -rc1.
> >
> > Is the driver gpio-max77620 applied?
>
> Nah, I misunderstood it, don't worry. Lee just merged the core
> driver(s). I have no idea what Julia's patch is based on, I was
> confused by this mail so I assumed it was in the tree but it
> was not. The world is full of mysteries :D

I don't know either.  It came to me via kbuild.  It may be derived from a
submitted patch rather than aready committed code.

julia

>
> > I think still there is discussion going on the patches?
>
> Sure let's work on this for the next cycle.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1311514

On Friday 15 January 2016 06:45 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> I think still there is discussion going on the patches?
> Sure let's work on this for the next cycle.
>
>

I have fixed this in V3 version and sent for review.
Please help to review it.

Thanks,
Laxman

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web