Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1312202 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-19 14:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-20 02:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-19 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-01-20 02:00 +0100
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 14:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code |
| Message-ID | <qSEmu-8o1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:30:50AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:01:29PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Lets factorize a bit of code there. We'll even have a third user soon. > > While at it, standardize the idle update function name against the > > others. > > This factorization was one of what I thought it needs to be done! :-) I shall interpret this as an Acked-by from you.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-20 02:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSPhV-77l-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1312202 |
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:30:50AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:01:29PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Lets factorize a bit of code there. We'll even have a third user soon. > > > While at it, standardize the idle update function name against the > > > others. > > > > This factorization was one of what I thought it needs to be done! :-) > > I shall interpret this as an Acked-by from you. Thumb up!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web