Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1312202 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code

Started byPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
First post2016-01-19 14:20 +0100
Last post2016-01-20 02:00 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-19 14:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-01-20 02:00 +0100

#1312202 — Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code

FromPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date2016-01-19 14:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code
Message-ID<qSEmu-8o1-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:30:50AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:01:29PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Lets factorize a bit of code there. We'll even have a third user soon.
> > While at it, standardize the idle update function name against the
> > others.
> 
> This factorization was one of what I thought it needs to be done! :-)

I shall interpret this as an Acked-by from you.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1312627

FromByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date2016-01-20 02:00 +0100
Message-ID<qSPhV-77l-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1312202
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:30:50AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:01:29PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Lets factorize a bit of code there. We'll even have a third user soon.
> > > While at it, standardize the idle update function name against the
> > > others.
> > 
> > This factorization was one of what I thought it needs to be done! :-)
> 
> I shall interpret this as an Acked-by from you.

Thumb up!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web