Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1312168 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-19 13:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-19 19:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-01-19 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-19 19:10 +0100
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 13:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection |
| Message-ID | <qSDgJ-7DY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
* Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Note: PPW_RAPL= performance per watt measured by RAPL package power > meter. > > If we just look at 20% forced idle, I can see significantly more deep > package C-states(PC7) residency. > Pkg%pc2 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7 > w/o patch 3.17 4.39 13.21 > w/ patch 1.15 1.43 17.24 Can this be translated to: "this patch improved power efficiency (watts per second) by XYZ percent?", with XYZ filled in accordingly? Thanks, Ingo
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 19:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSIT9-33H-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1312168 |
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:06:05 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > If we just look at 20% forced idle, I can see significantly more > > deep package C-states(PC7) residency. > > Pkg%pc2 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7 > > w/o patch 3.17 4.39 13.21 > > w/ patch 1.15 1.43 17.24 > > Can this be translated to: "this patch improved power efficiency > (watts per second) by XYZ percent?", with XYZ filled in accordingly? With CPU bound workload and 20% idle injection ratio, this patch improves performance per watt by 3.2% on Ivy Bridge system with Package C7 as the deepest idle. The above packages C-state residency explains why, i.e. more deeper PC7 when tick is stopped. With newer CPUs, this improvements should be more visible in that low power package C-states are getting deeper/less power. I will test on Skylake client as soon as I have time. Thanks, Jacob
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web