Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1311682 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-18 18:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-22 12:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] ARM64: XEN: Initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> - 2016-01-18 18:10 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] ARM64: XEN: Initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> - 2016-01-19 14:20 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] ARM64: XEN: Initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> - 2016-01-19 15:30 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] ARM64: XEN: Initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> - 2016-01-22 05:00 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] ARM64: XEN: Initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> - 2016-01-22 12:10 +0100
| From | Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-18 18:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] ARM64: XEN: Initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services |
| Message-ID | <qSltv-3KT-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> When running on Xen hypervisor, runtime services are supported through
> hypercall. So call Xen specific function to initialize runtime services.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
Thanks Shannon, much much better! Just a couple of questions.
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 5 +++++
> arch/arm64/xen/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm64/xen/efi.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/xen/Kconfig | 2 +-
> include/xen/xen-ops.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> index 485e117..84f27ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,11 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> if (xen_initial_domain())
> pvclock_gtod_register_notifier(&xen_pvclock_gtod_notifier);
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI)) {
> + if (efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT))
> + xen_efi_runtime_setup();
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
> early_initcall(xen_guest_init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> index 74a8d87..62e6fe2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> xen-arm-y += $(addprefix ../../arm/xen/, enlighten.o grant-table.o p2m.o mm.o)
> obj-y := xen-arm.o hypercall.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_EFI) += efi.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..33046b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Limited, Shannon Zhao
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
> + * with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/efi.h>
> +#include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> +
> +void __init xen_efi_runtime_setup(void)
> +{
> + efi.get_time = xen_efi_get_time;
> + efi.set_time = xen_efi_set_time;
> + efi.get_wakeup_time = xen_efi_get_wakeup_time;
> + efi.set_wakeup_time = xen_efi_set_wakeup_time;
> + efi.get_variable = xen_efi_get_variable;
> + efi.get_next_variable = xen_efi_get_next_variable;
> + efi.set_variable = xen_efi_set_variable;
> + efi.query_variable_info = xen_efi_query_variable_info;
> + efi.update_capsule = xen_efi_update_capsule;
> + efi.query_capsule_caps = xen_efi_query_capsule_caps;
> + efi.get_next_high_mono_count = xen_efi_get_next_high_mono_count;
> + efi.reset_system = NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_efi_runtime_setup);
This looks very similar to struct efi efi_xen previously in
drivers/xen/efi.c. Maybe it makes sense to leave struct efi efi_xen in
drivers/xen/efi.c, export it in include/xen/xen-ops.h, then here just:
efi = efi_xen;
Would that improve code readability?
Correct me if I am wrong, but on ARM64 (differently from x86) it is not
necessary to set efi.systab because it is not used, right? If so, it
would be best to add a comment here to remember.
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Kconfig b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> index 73708ac..27d216a 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ config XEN_HAVE_PVMMU
>
> config XEN_EFI
> def_bool y
> - depends on X86_64 && EFI
> + depends on (ARM64 || X86_64) && EFI
>
> config XEN_AUTO_XLATE
> def_bool y
> diff --git a/include/xen/xen-ops.h b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> index c83a338..36ff8e4 100644
> --- a/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> +++ b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ efi_status_t xen_efi_update_capsule(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
> efi_status_t xen_efi_query_capsule_caps(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
> unsigned long count, u64 *max_size,
> int *reset_type);
> +void xen_efi_runtime_setup(void);
xen_efi_runtime_setup is not defined on x86, but this header is not arch
specific.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 14:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSEmu-8o1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1311682 |
On 2016/1/19 1:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>>
>> When running on Xen hypervisor, runtime services are supported through
>> hypercall. So call Xen specific function to initialize runtime services.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Thanks Shannon, much much better! Just a couple of questions.
>
>
>> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 5 +++++
>> arch/arm64/xen/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/xen/efi.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/xen/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> include/xen/xen-ops.h | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> index 485e117..84f27ec 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -414,6 +414,11 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>> if (xen_initial_domain())
>> pvclock_gtod_register_notifier(&xen_pvclock_gtod_notifier);
>>
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI)) {
>> + if (efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT))
>> + xen_efi_runtime_setup();
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>> early_initcall(xen_guest_init);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
>> index 74a8d87..62e6fe2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
>> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>> xen-arm-y += $(addprefix ../../arm/xen/, enlighten.o grant-table.o p2m.o mm.o)
>> obj-y := xen-arm.o hypercall.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_EFI) += efi.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..33046b0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Limited, Shannon Zhao
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
>> + * with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/efi.h>
>> +#include <xen/xen-ops.h>
>> +
>> +void __init xen_efi_runtime_setup(void)
>> +{
>> + efi.get_time = xen_efi_get_time;
>> + efi.set_time = xen_efi_set_time;
>> + efi.get_wakeup_time = xen_efi_get_wakeup_time;
>> + efi.set_wakeup_time = xen_efi_set_wakeup_time;
>> + efi.get_variable = xen_efi_get_variable;
>> + efi.get_next_variable = xen_efi_get_next_variable;
>> + efi.set_variable = xen_efi_set_variable;
>> + efi.query_variable_info = xen_efi_query_variable_info;
>> + efi.update_capsule = xen_efi_update_capsule;
>> + efi.query_capsule_caps = xen_efi_query_capsule_caps;
>> + efi.get_next_high_mono_count = xen_efi_get_next_high_mono_count;
>> + efi.reset_system = NULL;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_efi_runtime_setup);
>
> This looks very similar to struct efi efi_xen previously in
> drivers/xen/efi.c. Maybe it makes sense to leave struct efi efi_xen in
> drivers/xen/efi.c, export it in include/xen/xen-ops.h, then here just:
>
> efi = efi_xen;
>
> Would that improve code readability?
>
Ok.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but on ARM64 (differently from x86) it is not
> necessary to set efi.systab because it is not used, right? If so, it
> would be best to add a comment here to remember.
>
Not set efi.systab here because it gets the system table through fdt and
set efi.systab there. See uefi_init() in arch/arm64/kernel.efi.c
efi.systab = early_memremap(efi_system_table,
sizeof(efi_system_table_t));
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Kconfig b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>> index 73708ac..27d216a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ config XEN_HAVE_PVMMU
>>
>> config XEN_EFI
>> def_bool y
>> - depends on X86_64 && EFI
>> + depends on (ARM64 || X86_64) && EFI
>>
>> config XEN_AUTO_XLATE
>> def_bool y
>> diff --git a/include/xen/xen-ops.h b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
>> index c83a338..36ff8e4 100644
>> --- a/include/xen/xen-ops.h
>> +++ b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
>> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ efi_status_t xen_efi_update_capsule(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
>> efi_status_t xen_efi_query_capsule_caps(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
>> unsigned long count, u64 *max_size,
>> int *reset_type);
>> +void xen_efi_runtime_setup(void);
>
> xen_efi_runtime_setup is not defined on x86, but this header is not arch
> specific.
>
--
Shannon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSFsf-Eb-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1312200 |
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> On 2016/1/19 1:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> > > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > When running on Xen hypervisor, runtime services are supported through
> > > hypercall. So call Xen specific function to initialize runtime services.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> >
> > Thanks Shannon, much much better! Just a couple of questions.
> >
> >
> > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 5 +++++
> > > arch/arm64/xen/Makefile | 1 +
> > > arch/arm64/xen/efi.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/xen/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > include/xen/xen-ops.h | 1 +
> > > 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > index 485e117..84f27ec 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > @@ -414,6 +414,11 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> > > if (xen_initial_domain())
> > > pvclock_gtod_register_notifier(&xen_pvclock_gtod_notifier);
> > >
> > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI)) {
> > > + if (efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT))
> > > + xen_efi_runtime_setup();
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > early_initcall(xen_guest_init);
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> > > index 74a8d87..62e6fe2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> > > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> > > xen-arm-y += $(addprefix ../../arm/xen/, enlighten.o grant-table.o p2m.o
> > > mm.o)
> > > obj-y := xen-arm.o hypercall.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_EFI) += efi.o
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..33046b0
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Limited, Shannon Zhao
> > > + *
> > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> > > + * (at your option) any later version.
> > > + *
> > > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> > > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > > + *
> > > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > > along
> > > + * with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/efi.h>
> > > +#include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> > > +
> > > +void __init xen_efi_runtime_setup(void)
> > > +{
> > > + efi.get_time = xen_efi_get_time;
> > > + efi.set_time = xen_efi_set_time;
> > > + efi.get_wakeup_time = xen_efi_get_wakeup_time;
> > > + efi.set_wakeup_time = xen_efi_set_wakeup_time;
> > > + efi.get_variable = xen_efi_get_variable;
> > > + efi.get_next_variable = xen_efi_get_next_variable;
> > > + efi.set_variable = xen_efi_set_variable;
> > > + efi.query_variable_info = xen_efi_query_variable_info;
> > > + efi.update_capsule = xen_efi_update_capsule;
> > > + efi.query_capsule_caps = xen_efi_query_capsule_caps;
> > > + efi.get_next_high_mono_count = xen_efi_get_next_high_mono_count;
> > > + efi.reset_system = NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_efi_runtime_setup);
> >
> > This looks very similar to struct efi efi_xen previously in
> > drivers/xen/efi.c. Maybe it makes sense to leave struct efi efi_xen in
> > drivers/xen/efi.c, export it in include/xen/xen-ops.h, then here just:
> >
> > efi = efi_xen;
> >
> > Would that improve code readability?
> >
> Ok.
> >
> > Correct me if I am wrong, but on ARM64 (differently from x86) it is not
> > necessary to set efi.systab because it is not used, right? If so, it
> > would be best to add a comment here to remember.
> >
> Not set efi.systab here because it gets the system table through fdt and set
> efi.systab there. See uefi_init() in arch/arm64/kernel.efi.c
>
> efi.systab = early_memremap(efi_system_table,
> sizeof(efi_system_table_t));
I see now. Then it might be still good to add a comment about that.
> > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/Kconfig b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> > > index 73708ac..27d216a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> > > @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ config XEN_HAVE_PVMMU
> > >
> > > config XEN_EFI
> > > def_bool y
> > > - depends on X86_64 && EFI
> > > + depends on (ARM64 || X86_64) && EFI
> > >
> > > config XEN_AUTO_XLATE
> > > def_bool y
> > > diff --git a/include/xen/xen-ops.h b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> > > index c83a338..36ff8e4 100644
> > > --- a/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> > > +++ b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> > > @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ efi_status_t
> > > xen_efi_update_capsule(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
> > > efi_status_t xen_efi_query_capsule_caps(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
> > > unsigned long count, u64 *max_size,
> > > int *reset_type);
> > > +void xen_efi_runtime_setup(void);
> >
> > xen_efi_runtime_setup is not defined on x86, but this header is not arch
> > specific.
> >
>
> --
> Shannon
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 05:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTB3c-6EO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1311682 |
On 2016/1/19 1:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>> >
>> > When running on Xen hypervisor, runtime services are supported through
>> > hypercall. So call Xen specific function to initialize runtime services.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> Thanks Shannon, much much better! Just a couple of questions.
>
>
>> > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 5 +++++
>> > arch/arm64/xen/Makefile | 1 +
>> > arch/arm64/xen/efi.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > drivers/xen/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> > include/xen/xen-ops.h | 1 +
>> > 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> > index 485e117..84f27ec 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> > @@ -414,6 +414,11 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>> > if (xen_initial_domain())
>> > pvclock_gtod_register_notifier(&xen_pvclock_gtod_notifier);
>> >
>> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI)) {
>> > + if (efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT))
>> > + xen_efi_runtime_setup();
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> > early_initcall(xen_guest_init);
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
>> > index 74a8d87..62e6fe2 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
>> > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>> > xen-arm-y += $(addprefix ../../arm/xen/, enlighten.o grant-table.o p2m.o mm.o)
>> > obj-y := xen-arm.o hypercall.o
>> > +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_EFI) += efi.o
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..33046b0
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>> > +/*
>> > + * Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Limited, Shannon Zhao
>> > + *
>> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> > + * (at your option) any later version.
>> > + *
>> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> > + *
>> > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
>> > + * with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +#include <linux/efi.h>
>> > +#include <xen/xen-ops.h>
>> > +
>> > +void __init xen_efi_runtime_setup(void)
>> > +{
>> > + efi.get_time = xen_efi_get_time;
>> > + efi.set_time = xen_efi_set_time;
>> > + efi.get_wakeup_time = xen_efi_get_wakeup_time;
>> > + efi.set_wakeup_time = xen_efi_set_wakeup_time;
>> > + efi.get_variable = xen_efi_get_variable;
>> > + efi.get_next_variable = xen_efi_get_next_variable;
>> > + efi.set_variable = xen_efi_set_variable;
>> > + efi.query_variable_info = xen_efi_query_variable_info;
>> > + efi.update_capsule = xen_efi_update_capsule;
>> > + efi.query_capsule_caps = xen_efi_query_capsule_caps;
>> > + efi.get_next_high_mono_count = xen_efi_get_next_high_mono_count;
>> > + efi.reset_system = NULL;
>> > +}
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_efi_runtime_setup);
> This looks very similar to struct efi efi_xen previously in
> drivers/xen/efi.c. Maybe it makes sense to leave struct efi efi_xen in
> drivers/xen/efi.c, export it in include/xen/xen-ops.h, then here just:
>
> efi = efi_xen;
>
> Would that improve code readability?
Rethink about this. It's a little different on ARM since we call
xen_efi_runtime_setup after parsing the FDT and setting some members of
efi already, e.g. efi.systab, efi.acpi20. So it necessary to have a
different way to initialize the struct efi.
Thanks,
--
Shannon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 12:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTHLl-3dT-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1314737 |
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> On 2016/1/19 1:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >> > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> >> >
> >> > When running on Xen hypervisor, runtime services are supported through
> >> > hypercall. So call Xen specific function to initialize runtime services.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> > Thanks Shannon, much much better! Just a couple of questions.
> >
> >
> >> > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 5 +++++
> >> > arch/arm64/xen/Makefile | 1 +
> >> > arch/arm64/xen/efi.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > drivers/xen/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >> > include/xen/xen-ops.h | 1 +
> >> > 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> > index 485e117..84f27ec 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> > @@ -414,6 +414,11 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> >> > if (xen_initial_domain())
> >> > pvclock_gtod_register_notifier(&xen_pvclock_gtod_notifier);
> >> >
> >> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_EFI)) {
> >> > + if (efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT))
> >> > + xen_efi_runtime_setup();
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > return 0;
> >> > }
> >> > early_initcall(xen_guest_init);
> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> >> > index 74a8d87..62e6fe2 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/Makefile
> >> > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> >> > xen-arm-y += $(addprefix ../../arm/xen/, enlighten.o grant-table.o p2m.o mm.o)
> >> > obj-y := xen-arm.o hypercall.o
> >> > +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_EFI) += efi.o
> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 0000000..33046b0
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/efi.c
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> >> > +/*
> >> > + * Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Limited, Shannon Zhao
> >> > + *
> >> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >> > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >> > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> >> > + * (at your option) any later version.
> >> > + *
> >> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> >> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> >> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> >> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >> > + *
> >> > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
> >> > + * with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> >> > + */
> >> > +
> >> > +#include <linux/efi.h>
> >> > +#include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> >> > +
> >> > +void __init xen_efi_runtime_setup(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > + efi.get_time = xen_efi_get_time;
> >> > + efi.set_time = xen_efi_set_time;
> >> > + efi.get_wakeup_time = xen_efi_get_wakeup_time;
> >> > + efi.set_wakeup_time = xen_efi_set_wakeup_time;
> >> > + efi.get_variable = xen_efi_get_variable;
> >> > + efi.get_next_variable = xen_efi_get_next_variable;
> >> > + efi.set_variable = xen_efi_set_variable;
> >> > + efi.query_variable_info = xen_efi_query_variable_info;
> >> > + efi.update_capsule = xen_efi_update_capsule;
> >> > + efi.query_capsule_caps = xen_efi_query_capsule_caps;
> >> > + efi.get_next_high_mono_count = xen_efi_get_next_high_mono_count;
> >> > + efi.reset_system = NULL;
> >> > +}
> >> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_efi_runtime_setup);
> > This looks very similar to struct efi efi_xen previously in
> > drivers/xen/efi.c. Maybe it makes sense to leave struct efi efi_xen in
> > drivers/xen/efi.c, export it in include/xen/xen-ops.h, then here just:
> >
> > efi = efi_xen;
> >
> > Would that improve code readability?
>
> Rethink about this. It's a little different on ARM since we call
> xen_efi_runtime_setup after parsing the FDT and setting some members of
> efi already, e.g. efi.systab, efi.acpi20. So it necessary to have a
> different way to initialize the struct efi.
OK, fair enough.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web