Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1311102 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with new maintainers

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state,  with new maintainers Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-01-17 03:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with  new maintainers Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-01-17 09:50 +0100

#1311102 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with new maintainers

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rich, Sato-san,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:40:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> >> > > From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
> >> > >
> >> > > Add Yoshinori Sato and Rich Felker as maintainers for arch/sh
> >> > > (SUPERH).
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
> >> > > Acked-by: D. Jeff Dionne <jeff@uClinux.org>
> >> > > Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
> >> >
> >> > A much appreciated move,
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> >>
> >> Likewise,
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> 
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Thanks!

> > While patch 2/2 still seems to need discussion and resolution, I don't
> > think this part (1/2, adding us as maintainers) is controversial. Can
> > it be committed now? Geert? Andrew?
> 
> I think it should go in either through Andrew, or through yourself, depending
> on whether you already have other stuff ready for this merge window, and have
> a git repo to pull from.
> 
> Do you have a git repository to ask Linus to pull from, and to provide a branch
> for linux-next integration testing?

Not quite yet. If it can be done in this merge window, I think it
makes sense for Andrew to do it to make it official that arch/sh isn't
abandoned, and Sato-san and I can have the repo setup well ahead of
the next window. How does that sound?

I'd love it if we could get some of the actual code changes in for
this merge window too but I'm not clear whether there's still time.

Rich

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1311111 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with new maintainers

Hi Rich,

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:40:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
>> >> > > From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Add Yoshinori Sato and Rich Felker as maintainers for arch/sh
>> >> > > (SUPERH).

>> > While patch 2/2 still seems to need discussion and resolution, I don't
>> > think this part (1/2, adding us as maintainers) is controversial. Can
>> > it be committed now? Geert? Andrew?
>>
>> I think it should go in either through Andrew, or through yourself, depending
>> on whether you already have other stuff ready for this merge window, and have
>> a git repo to pull from.
>>
>> Do you have a git repository to ask Linus to pull from, and to provide a branch
>> for linux-next integration testing?
>
> Not quite yet. If it can be done in this merge window, I think it
> makes sense for Andrew to do it to make it official that arch/sh isn't
> abandoned, and Sato-san and I can have the repo setup well ahead of
> the next window. How does that sound?

That sounds fine to me.

> I'd love it if we could get some of the actual code changes in for
> this merge window too but I'm not clear whether there's still time.

I don't think there's a reason to hurry.
People can start using your tree as soon as it becomes public.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web