Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1306315 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-11 15:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-12 01:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] devicetree: mxsfb: add reset-active property Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-11 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] devicetree: mxsfb: add reset-active property Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-12 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] devicetree: mxsfb: add reset-active property Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-01-12 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] devicetree: mxsfb: add reset-active property Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-01-12 01:10 +0100
| From | Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 15:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] devicetree: mxsfb: add reset-active property |
| Message-ID | <qPLNw-3Dk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:24:56PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: >> Some boards connect the LCD_RESET pin to a reset input on the >> display panel. On these boards, this pin must be set to the >> proper level for the display to function. >> >> This adds an optional "reset-active" property to the "display" >> subnode such that devicetrees can specify the desired polarity >> of the LCD_RESET pin. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> What happened to this patch? -- Måns Rullgård
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPUH7-1tj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1306315 |
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote: >> Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:24:56PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: >>>> Some boards connect the LCD_RESET pin to a reset input on the >>>> display panel. On these boards, this pin must be set to the >>>> proper level for the display to function. >>>> >>>> This adds an optional "reset-active" property to the "display" >>>> subnode such that devicetrees can specify the desired polarity >>>> of the LCD_RESET pin. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> >>> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> >> What happened to this patch? > > If I acked it, then I'm expecting the platform or subsystem maintainer > to pick up the series. I don't have patch #2 either, so I'm definitely > not picking up the series. Argh, get_maintainer.pl picking different people for different patches again. I really wish it would/could send all patches in a series to the same recipients in cases like this. Should I resend both to the combined set of people so everybody gets to see everything? -- Måns Rullgård
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 01:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPV0u-1AF-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1306841 |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote: > Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes: > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote: >>> Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes: >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:24:56PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: >>>>> Some boards connect the LCD_RESET pin to a reset input on the >>>>> display panel. On these boards, this pin must be set to the >>>>> proper level for the display to function. >>>>> >>>>> This adds an optional "reset-active" property to the "display" >>>>> subnode such that devicetrees can specify the desired polarity >>>>> of the LCD_RESET pin. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >>> >>> What happened to this patch? >> >> If I acked it, then I'm expecting the platform or subsystem maintainer >> to pick up the series. I don't have patch #2 either, so I'm definitely >> not picking up the series. > > Argh, get_maintainer.pl picking different people for different patches > again. I really wish it would/could send all patches in a series to the > same recipients in cases like this. Yeah, we really need some scripts around creating Cc list for series gel_maintainers.pl really only works for a single commit. I imagine everyone has some level of scripts around it. > Should I resend both to the combined set of people so everybody gets to > see everything? Yes, as long as you are not resending daily, just resend. Send the series TO who you think should merge it. Rob
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPUH7-1tj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1306315 |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote: > Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes: > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:24:56PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: >>> Some boards connect the LCD_RESET pin to a reset input on the >>> display panel. On these boards, this pin must be set to the >>> proper level for the display to function. >>> >>> This adds an optional "reset-active" property to the "display" >>> subnode such that devicetrees can specify the desired polarity >>> of the LCD_RESET pin. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> >> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > What happened to this patch? If I acked it, then I'm expecting the platform or subsystem maintainer to pick up the series. I don't have patch #2 either, so I'm definitely not picking up the series. Rob
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web