Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1306599 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-11 19:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-12 15:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH] printk: clear console_may_schedule on panic flushing Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-01-11 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] printk: clear console_may_schedule on panic flushing Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-11 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] printk: clear console_may_schedule on panic flushing Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-01-11 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] printk: clear console_may_schedule on panic flushing Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-01-11 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] printk: clear console_may_schedule on panic flushing Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 15:00 +0100
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 19:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] printk: clear console_may_schedule on panic flushing |
| Message-ID | <qPPHs-6ex-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Commit "printk: do cond_resched() between lines while outputting to
consoles" made console flushing perform cond_resched() after each line
if the context allows as determined by whether the console lock was
acquired with console_lock(). The condition is carried in
console_may_schedule.
During panic, console lock status is ignored and the messages are
forcifully flushed which is implemented by performing
console_trylock(); console_unlock(); sequence ignoring whether trylock
succeeds or fails. This means that the emergency flushing, after
trylock failure, may enter flushing path with console_may_schedule set
from the actual holder.
As a system may panic from any context, this can lead to
cond_resched() being invoked from a non-sleepable context triggering
an extra warning dump while panicking which is noisy and can be
confusing. Besides, even when panicking from a sleepable context, we
don't want to be yielding during emergency message dumping.
Currently, the emergency dumping is opencoded in panic(). This patch
replaces the open coded implementation with a new function,
console_flush_on_panic() and makes it explicitly clear
console_may_schedule before starting the emergency flushing.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/878u3w95ke.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com
---
include/linux/console.h | 1 +
kernel/panic.c | 3 +--
kernel/printk/printk.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/console.h b/include/linux/console.h
index bd19434..ea731af 100644
--- a/include/linux/console.h
+++ b/include/linux/console.h
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ extern int console_trylock(void);
extern void console_unlock(void);
extern void console_conditional_schedule(void);
extern void console_unblank(void);
+extern void console_flush_on_panic(void);
extern struct tty_driver *console_device(int *);
extern void console_stop(struct console *);
extern void console_start(struct console *);
diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
index b333380..d96469d 100644
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -180,8 +180,7 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
* panic() is not being callled from OOPS.
*/
debug_locks_off();
- console_trylock();
- console_unlock();
+ console_flush_on_panic();
if (!panic_blink)
panic_blink = no_blink;
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index d0b8697..7ebcfea 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -2386,6 +2386,25 @@ void console_unblank(void)
console_unlock();
}
+/**
+ * console_flush_on_panic - flush console content on panic
+ *
+ * Immediately output all pending messages no matter what.
+ */
+void console_flush_on_panic(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * If someone else is holding the console lock, trylock will fail
+ * and may_schedule may be set. Ignore and proceed to unlock so
+ * that messages are flushed out. As this can be called from any
+ * context and we don't want to get preempted while flushing,
+ * ensure may_schedule is cleared.
+ */
+ console_trylock();
+ console_may_schedule = 0;
+ console_unlock();
+}
+
/*
* Return the console tty driver structure and its associated index
*/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 23:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPSFl-8fi-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1306599 |
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:43:48 -0500 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: > Commit "printk: do cond_resched() between lines while outputting to > consoles" made console flushing perform cond_resched() after each line > if the context allows as determined by whether the console lock was > acquired with console_lock(). The condition is carried in > console_may_schedule. > > During panic, console lock status is ignored and the messages are > forcifully flushed which is implemented by performing > console_trylock(); console_unlock(); sequence ignoring whether trylock > succeeds or fails. This means that the emergency flushing, after > trylock failure, may enter flushing path with console_may_schedule set > from the actual holder. > > As a system may panic from any context, this can lead to > cond_resched() being invoked from a non-sleepable context triggering > an extra warning dump while panicking which is noisy and can be > confusing. Besides, even when panicking from a sleepable context, we > don't want to be yielding during emergency message dumping. > > Currently, the emergency dumping is opencoded in panic(). This patch > replaces the open coded implementation with a new function, > console_flush_on_panic() and makes it explicitly clear > console_may_schedule before starting the emergency flushing. > Got that, thanks. Because the patch has significant information content I'd normally make it a standalone thing, but as it's destined for -stable I think I'll scrunch it into printk-do-cond_resched-between-lines-while-outputting-to-consoles.patch and merge the changelogs. You didn't comment on Sergey's observations (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/2/1192), but I'm believing this is a separate issue and that this patch is still good.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 23:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPSP0-7w-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1306737 |
Hello, On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:59:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Got that, thanks. Because the patch has significant information > content I'd normally make it a standalone thing, but as it's destined > for -stable I think I'll scrunch it into > printk-do-cond_resched-between-lines-while-outputting-to-consoles.patch > and merge the changelogs. Sure thing. > You didn't comment on Sergey's observations > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/2/1192), but I'm believing this is > a separate issue and that this patch is still good. Missed that one somehow. Will respond. Thanks. -- tejun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 23:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPT8m-gV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1306747 |
Hello, again. On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:09:27PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > You didn't comment on Sergey's observations > > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/2/1192), but I'm believing this is > > a separate issue and that this patch is still good. > > Missed that one somehow. Will respond. So, I agree with Jan's response there. My patch wasn't a full solution to the whole problem. It solves a specific case (hang during registration of a slow console device) and is also needed for future improvements but we still need Jan's patchset and more to actually get the problem solved. Thanks. -- tejun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 15:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qQ7En-1Fv-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1306737 |
On (01/11/16 13:59), Andrew Morton wrote: > > Commit "printk: do cond_resched() between lines while outputting to > > consoles" made console flushing perform cond_resched() after each line > > if the context allows as determined by whether the console lock was > > acquired with console_lock(). The condition is carried in > > console_may_schedule. > > > > During panic, console lock status is ignored and the messages are > > forcifully flushed which is implemented by performing > > console_trylock(); console_unlock(); sequence ignoring whether trylock > > succeeds or fails. This means that the emergency flushing, after > > trylock failure, may enter flushing path with console_may_schedule set > > from the actual holder. > > > > As a system may panic from any context, this can lead to > > cond_resched() being invoked from a non-sleepable context triggering > > an extra warning dump while panicking which is noisy and can be > > confusing. Besides, even when panicking from a sleepable context, we > > don't want to be yielding during emergency message dumping. > > > > Currently, the emergency dumping is opencoded in panic(). This patch > > replaces the open coded implementation with a new function, > > console_flush_on_panic() and makes it explicitly clear > > console_may_schedule before starting the emergency flushing. > > > > Got that, thanks. Because the patch has significant information > content I'd normally make it a standalone thing, but as it's destined > for -stable I think I'll scrunch it into > printk-do-cond_resched-between-lines-while-outputting-to-consoles.patch > and merge the changelogs. > > You didn't comment on Sergey's observations > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/2/1192), but I'm believing this is > a separate issue and that this patch is still good. Thanks for Cc-ing. Yes, this problem is different. FWIW, what I ended up implementing in my private builds is a bit different thing -- I added a new console_panic_mode() function which basically calls zap_locks(). The reason I did it this way was that console_unlock() can potentially have other locks in it some day, not just `console_sem'. For example, like in one of Jan's deferred printk implementations. Sort of a defensive move to avoid possible problems. -ss
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web